Jisoo Park

Dr. Jisoo Park

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 November 2020 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EKEunho Ko
Eunho Ko
MGMaxim Y Gorbunov
Maxim Y Gorbunov
JJJinyoung Jung
Jinyoung Jung
HJHyoung Min Joo
Hyoung Min Joo
YLYoungju Lee
Youngju Lee
JPJisoo Park
Jisoo Park
Phytoplankton in the Arctic Ocean are subject to nitrogen limitation in the summer, however, how severely the nitrogen stress affects phytoplankton physiology remains largely unknown. In the summers of 2015–2018, we examined the distribution of phytoplankton photophysiological properties across two contrasting regions of the Arctic Ocean with distinctly different levels of nitrogen availability in the upper water column. We quantified the extent of nitrogen stress using a highly sensitive fluorescence induction and relaxation system to obtain continuous underway measurements and via discrete sample analyses of phytoplankton physiology, as well as nutrient enrichment incubations. The results revealed vast regions in the Chukchi Sea where phytoplankton photosynthesis was severely nitrogen‐stressed. Thereby, the maximum quantum yield of photochemistry in photosystem II showed only a small decrease (12 ± 9%) relative to its nutrient‐replete values, while the maximum photosynthetic electron transport rates under saturating irradiance were impaired to a greater extent (40 ± 17%). This phytoplankton photosynthesis response is indicative of a severe nitrogen limitation, which results in dramatic reduction in growth and net primary production rates. Nutrient enrichment incubations also revealed a marked increase in large‐size phytoplankton growth (>10 μm) after the nitrogen stress was alleviated, suggesting that the larger cells were more susceptible to nitrogen stress. These results are important for understanding how regional nitrogen fluxes control variability in the primary production and phytoplankton community structure and how these processes might change with rapid climate changes in the Arctic Ocean.

12 December 2021 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TKTae-Wan Kim
Tae-Wan Kim
HYHee Won Yang
Hee Won Yang
PDPierre Dutrieux
Pierre Dutrieux
AWAnna K. Wåhlin
Anna K. Wåhlin
AJAdrian Jenkins
Adrian Jenkins
YCYang-Ki Cho
Yang-Ki Cho
Widespread ice shelf thinning has been recorded in the Amundsen Sea in recent decades, driven by basal melting and intrusions of relatively warm Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW) onto the continental shelf. The Dotson Ice Shelf (DIS) is located to the south of the Amundsen Sea polynya, and has a high basal melting rate because modified CDW (mCDW) fills the Dotson‐Getz Trough (DGT) and reaches the base of the ice shelf. Here, hydrographic data in the DGT obtained during seven oceanographic surveys from 2007 to 2018 were used to study the interannual variation in mCDW volume and properties and their causes. Although mCDW volume showed relatively weak interannual variations at the continental shelf break, these variations intensified southward and reached a maximum in front of the DIS. There, the mCDW volume was ∼8,000 km3 in 2007, rapidly decreased to 4,700 km3 in 2014 before rebounding to 7,300 km3 in 2018. We find that such interannual variability is coherent with local Ekman pumping integrated along the DGT modulated by the presence of sea ice, and complementing earlier theories involving shelf break winds only. The interannual variability in strength of the dominant south‐southeast coastal wind modulates the amplitude of Ekman upwelling along the eastern boundary of the Amundsen Sea polynya during the austral summers of the surveyed years, apparently leading to change in the volume of mCDW along the DGT. We note a strong correlation between the wind variability and the longitudinal location of the Amundsen Sea Low.

27 January 2022 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJong-Ku Gal
Jong-Ku Gal
SHSun‐Yong Ha
Sun‐Yong Ha
JPJisoo Park
Jisoo Park
KSKyung-Hoon Shin
Kyung-Hoon Shin
DKDongseon Kim
Dongseon Kim
EYEun Jin Yang
Eun Jin Yang
Satellite observations and modeling data have suggested a significant increase in net primary production in the Arctic Ocean over the last decade due to retreating sea ice and the development of light availability caused by Arctic warming. Subsequently, under‐ice blooms (UIBs) are being recognized as an important phenomenon from the traditional perspective. However, the role of sea‐ice algae in UIBs is still unknown due to the limited availability of continuous observations. We analyzed data on primary producer‐derived lipid biomarkers from sinking particles collected over 1 year using time‐series sediment traps on the East Siberian Sea and Chukchi Sea slopes. Based on the seasonal changes in sympagic organic carbon derived from the data of the ice proxy (IP25) flux and pelagic biomarkers, such as highly branched isoprenoid trienes, epi‐brassicasterol and dinosterol, a UIB was identified in summer 2018 on the East Siberian Sea slope. Compared to the nutrient distribution on the Chukchi Sea slope, the UIB on the East Siberian Sea slope might have been triggered by the nutrient supply. The estimated flux‐weighted mean sympagic organic carbon value measured during the UIB period (May−August) was 1.04 mg m−2 d−1 on the East Siberian Sea slope, approximately five times greater than recorded that on the Chukchi Sea slope (0.23 mg m−2 d−1) during the same period. Our findings suggest that the importance of sea‐ice algae as primary producers has increased as the UIB phenomenon has become more important in the Arctic Ocean and that sea‐ice environments face changes due to Arctic warming.

25 October 2022 in Frontiers in Marine Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EKEunho Ko
Eunho Ko
MGMaxim Y. Gorbunov
Maxim Y. Gorbunov
JJJinyoung Jung
Jinyoung Jung
YLYoungju Lee
Youngju Lee
KCKyoung-Ho Cho
Kyoung-Ho Cho
JPJisoo Park
Jisoo Park
Vertical distributions of phytoplankton in the Arctic Ocean are characterized by a very narrow subsurface chlorophyll maximum (SCM) layer formed every summer after the sea ice retreats. Despite the prevalence of this narrow SCM layer, phytoplankton photosynthetic response to climate change remains to be elucidated. Here, we examined the photophysiological properties of phytoplankton in the SCM layer in the northern Chukchi Sea during the summers of 2015–2018. There was a significant difference in the SCM depth between the northwestern and northeastern Chukchi Sea determined by the distribution of Pacific Summer Water (PSW) around the SCM layer (34 ± 14 m vs. 49 ± 10 m, respectively). The maximum quantum yield of photochemistry in photosystem II (Fv/Fm) in the SCM phytoplankton was high (Fv/Fm ≥ 0.54) and similar in both regions until 2016; however, since then, Fv/Fm in the northeastern Chukchi Sea has decreased by approximately 10%. This decrease was accompanied by a marked decrease in the fraction of microplankton, which are known to be susceptible to nutrient limitation. This result suggests a reduction in nitrogen availability in the SCM layer in the northeastern Chukchi Sea. Meanwhile, the maximum electron transfer rate (ETRmax) did not have a significant relationship with the nitrogen availability and phytoplankton community size structure in the SCM layer; however the improved light conditions (with an approximately two-fold increase in the relative ratio of surface PAR reaching the SCM layer) increased ETRmax by up to 30% in the SCM phytoplankton in the northwestern Chukchi Sea. Therefore, these results provide a better understanding of how changes in nitrogen and light availability could affect phytoplankton photosynthesis and primary production in the Arctic Ocean.

28 October 2022 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YLYoungju Lee
Youngju Lee
JPJisoo Park
Jisoo Park
JJJinyoung Jung
Jinyoung Jung
TKTae-Wan Kim
Tae-Wan Kim
In the Antarctic coast, ice shelves are rapidly thinning and retreating due to global warming. Basal melt water influences marine life, particularly the phytoplankton, which are directly affected by changes in physicochemical environments. However, there is limited in situ data over large areas in the Amundsen Sea, which is currently a hotspot for rapidly thinning ice shelves in West Antarctica. During the austral summer cruise of 2020, phytoplankton species abundance was investigated along the Amundsen Sea coast using an automated continuous observation instrument, the Imaging FlowCytobot. The phytoplankton community was dominated by Phaeocystis antarctica in most coastal waters of the Amundsen Sea, as previously reported; however, unexpected blooms of diatom Dactyliosolen tenuijunctus were observed throughout the Pine Island Bay region at a high dominance rate (∼90%) and abundance (>107 cells l−1). D. tenuijunctus is a weakly silicified diatom and its massive bloom in the water column has been rarely reported from the Antarctic Ocean. The dramatic difference in phytoplankton compositions between these adjacent polynyas probably indicates an unstable response of phytoplankton to ice melting conditions. They could play a different role in the marine food web and carbon flux compared to other diatoms and P. antarctica. Therefore, further research is warranted to predict the biological and biogeochemical impacts of future melting conditions.

26 January 2024 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EKEunho Ko
Eunho Ko
JPJisoo Park
Jisoo Park
KCKyoung-Ho Cho
Kyoung-Ho Cho
JYJaeill Yoo
Jaeill Yoo
JMJong Kuk Moon
Jong Kuk Moon
EYEun Jin Yang
Eun Jin Yang
Rapid Arctic Ocean warming has caused severe sea ice decline, impacting light distribution, phytoplankton blooms, and primary production. We investigated Arctic phytoplankton bloom timing using continuous chlorophyll-a fluorescence data obtained from three Korea Arctic Mooring Systems (KAMSs) deployed north of the East Siberian Sea (KAMS1), north of the Chukchi Sea (KAMS2), and the middle of the Northwind Ridge (KAMS4). Our findings revealed that the bloom initiation times were June 4 (±28 d) in KAMS1, June 24 in KAMS2, and May 21 (±6 d) in KAMS4, when the sea ice concentration (SIC) was >90% and the ice thickness was 1–2 m, indicating that the under-ice phytoplankton blooms (UIBs) developed 1–2 months before the sea ice retreated (mid-July, when SIC was <80%). Peak bloom and termination times were consistently observed in early August and mid-October, respectively. The average phytoplankton bloom lasted for approximately four months, longer than the open water periods at the mooring sites. However, the timing of the phytoplankton blooms from the biogeochemical model-based reconstructions was, on average, 6–10 weeks later than that deduced from the observed data. Furthermore, the maximum chlorophyll-a concentration observed during the bloom peak was approximately ten-times higher than that indicated by the biogeochemical model-based reconstructions (1.81 vs. 0.17 mg −3). The differences in chlorophyll-a concentrations and bloom timings indicate that biogeochemical models remain insufficient for simulating the phytoplankton dynamics of the Arctic Ocean, such as UIBs and the subsurface chlorophyll maximum layer. Based on the continuously observed chlorophyll-a concentrations, we gained a precise understanding of the seasonal cycles of Arctic phytoplankton, including UIBs. These valuable data will contribute to improving the accuracy of biogeochemical models of the Arctic Ocean.