Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) programs have the ability to answer complex queries including medical profession examination questions. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of orthopaedic residents (ortho residents) against Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT)-3.5 and GPT-4 on orthopaedic assessment examinations. A secondary objective was to perform a subgroup analysis comparing the performance of each group on questions that included image interpretation versus text-only questions. Methods: The ResStudy orthopaedic examination question bank was used as the primary source of questions. One hundred eighty questions and answer choices from nine different orthopaedic subspecialties were directly input into ChatGPT-3.5 and then GPT-4. ChatGPT did not have consistently available image interpretation, so no images were directly provided to either AI format. Answers were recorded as correct versus incorrect by the chatbot, and resident performance was recorded based on user data provided by ResStudy. Results: Overall, ChatGPT-3.5, GPT-4, and ortho residents scored 29.4%, 47.2%, and 74.2%, respectively. There was a difference among the three groups in testing success, with ortho residents scoring higher than ChatGPT-3.5 and GPT-4 (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). GPT-4 scored higher than ChatGPT-3.5 (P = 0.002). A subgroup analysis was performed by dividing questions into question stems without images and question stems with images. ChatGPT-3.5 was more correct (37.8% vs. 22.4%, respectively, OR = 2.1, P = 0.033) and ChatGPT-4 was also more correct (61.0% vs. 35.7%, OR = 2.8, P < 0.001), when comparing text-only questions versus questions with images. Residents were 72.6% versus 75.5% correct with text-only questions versus questions with images, with no significant difference (P = 0.302). Conclusion: Orthopaedic residents were able to answer more questions accurately than ChatGPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on orthopaedic assessment examinations. GPT-4 is superior to ChatGPT-3.5 for answering orthopaedic resident assessment examination questions. Both ChatGPT-3.5 and GPT-4 performed better on text-only questions than questions with images. It is unlikely that GPT-4 or ChatGPT-3.5 would pass the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery written examination.

The novel coronavirus pandemic, also known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has placed an immense strain on healthcare systems across the entire world. Consequently, multiple federal and state governments have placed restrictions on hospitals such as limiting “elective surgery” and recommending social or physical distancing. We review the literature on several areas that have been affected including surgical selection, inpatient care, and physician well-being. These areas affecting inpatient paradigms include surgical priority, physical or social distancing, file sharing for online clinical communications, and physician wellness. During this crisis, it is important that orthopaedic departments place an emphasis on personnel safety and slowing the spread of the virus so that the department can still maintain vital functions. Physical distancing and emerging technologies such as inpatient telemedicine and online file sharing applications can enable orthopaedic programs to still function while attempting to protect medical staff and patients from the novel coronavirus spread. This literature review sought to provide evidence-based guidance to orthopaedic departments during an unprecedented time. Orthopaedic surgeons should follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, wear personal protective equipment (PPE) when appropriate, have teams created using physical distancing, understand the department's policy on elective surgery, and engage in routines which enhance physician wellness.

Newer repair techniques of anterior cruciate ligament tears, including augmentation with internal brace, have shown promising clinical results. Few biomechanical studies exist comparing anterior cruciate ligament repair only versus repair with internal brace. The purpose of this study was to compare the load to failure and stiffness of anterior cruciate ligament repair with internal brace augmentation versus repair-only. Proximal femoral avulsion type anterior cruciate ligament injuries were created in 20 cadaver knees. Anterior cruciate ligament repair-only or repair with internal brace was performed using arthroscopic tools. Load to failure and failure modes were collected, with calculations of stiffness and energy to failure performed. The average load to failure for the internal brace group was higher than the repair-only group: 693 N (SD 248) versus 279 N (SD 91), P = .002. The stiffness and energy to failure values were higher for the internal brace group than the repair-only group: 83 N/mm versus 58 N/mm, P = .02 and 16.88 J (SD 12.44) versus 6.91 J (SD 2.49), P = .04, respectively. Failure modes differed between groups (P = .00097) with 80% failure in the repair-only due to suture pull through the anterior cruciate ligament and 90% failure in the internal brace group due to suture button pull through the femur. There was higher load to failure, stiffness, and energy to failure for the internal brace group compared to the repair-only group, and a high positive correlation between bone density and load to failure for the internal brace group. Anterior cruciate ligament repair with internal brace augmentation demonstrates significantly higher load to failure. It may be a useful adjunct to protect the anterior cruciate ligament repair from failure during the early stages of healing.

Background: Radial meniscus tears can cause the meniscus to be completely incompetent. This serious type of meniscus tear can be difficult to repair. Techniques have been developed that juxtapose the meniscus tear edges and are able to withstand high loads. The purpose of this study was to determine the load to failure of a reinforced suture bar repair (Rebar Repair) for radial meniscus tear and compare it to the parallel suture technique and cross‐stitch technique and to compare mode of failure among all three groups. The hypothesis was that the Rebar Repair will have a higher load to failure than both the parallel technique and the cross‐stitch technique and that the Rebar Repair would have a lower rate of suture cutting through the meniscus.Methods: Forty‐eight menisci were tested from 24 human knee specimens, with 16 menisci in each group evenly distributed between medial and lateral menisci. Radial mid body meniscal tears were recreated and repaired with one of three inside‐out techniques: the 2‐parallel suture technique, 2 cross‐stitch sutures, and the Rebar Repair. The specimens were cycled between 5 N to 30 N and axially loaded to failure perpendicularly across the repair site.Results: The average load to failure of the parallel group, cross‐stitch group and Rebar Repair was 85.5 N ± 22.0, 76.2 N ± 28.8 and 124.1 N ± 27.1 respectively. The Rebar Repair had a higher load to failure than the parallel group (p < 0.01) and cross‐stitch group (p < 0.01). There was no difference in the load to failure between the cross‐stitch and parallel group (p = 0.49). The failure mechanism was different when comparing the 3 groups (p < 0.01). The predominant mode of failure for both the parallel and cross‐stitch group was suture cutout through the meniscus (88% and 94% respectively). The Rebar Repair failed due to suture rupture in 50% and suture cutout through the meniscus in 50%.Conclusion: The Rebar Repair for radial meniscus tear has a higher load to failure and a lower rate of suture cutout through the meniscus than the parallel technique and cross‐stitch technique.Clinical relevance: Radial meniscus tears lead to decreased hoop stresses of the meniscus and effectively a non‐functional meniscus. Newer techniques may have a higher load to failure leading to more successful repairs.

Aging causes a reduction in testosterone and estrogen, which is linked to diminished bone mineral density. Hormone replacement therapy and its effect on the outcome of joint arthroplasties is unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) and estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) on the medical and joint outcomes of total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasties (TKA). A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. Patients who received TRT or ERT perioperatively were matched to controls. Rates of 90-day medical complications and 2-year joint complications were queried. Patients who received TRT had an increased risk of revision, periprosthetic joint infection, and pooled joint complications within 2 years following a THA and increased rates of septic and aseptic revisions, and aseptic loosening after TKA compared to the control cohort. Patients receiving ERT had increased rates of aseptic loosening and pooled joint complications within 2 years following THA and increased rates of all-cause revisions and pooled joint complications after TKA. Patients who received TRT demonstrated significantly higher rates of revision rates and PJI. Patients who received perioperative ERT were significantly more likely to have increased risks of revision rates and joint infections.

Background: Patellar tendon ruptures have routinely been repaired with transosseous suture tunnels. The use of knotless suture anchors for repair has been suggested as an alternative. Purpose: To compare the load to failure and gap formation of patellar tendon repair at the inferior pole of the patella with knotless suture anchor tape versus transosseous sutures. A secondary objective was to investigate whether either technique shows an association between bone density and load to failure. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 20 human tibias with attached patellar and quadriceps tendons were sharply incised at the bone-tendon junction at the inferior pole of the patella. A total of 10 tendons were repaired using 2 knotless suture anchors in the inferior pole of the patella and a single suture tape with 2 core sutures. The other 10 tendons were repaired using No. 2 suture passed through 3 transosseous tunnels. A distracting force was then applied through the suture in the quadriceps tendon. Gap distance through load cycling at the repair site and maximum load at repair failure were then measured. Bone density was measured using computed tomography scanning. Results: No difference was found in the mean load to failure of knotless patellar tendon repair versus transosseous suture repair (367.6 ± 112.2 vs 433.9 ± 99 N, respectively; P = .12). After 250 cycles, the mean repair site gap distance was 0.85 ± 0.45 mm for the knotless patellar tendon repair versus 2.94 ± 2.03 mm for the transosseous suture repair ( P = .03). A small correlation, although not statistically significant, was found between bone density and load to failure for the knotless tape repair ( R ² = 0.228; P = .66). No correlation was found between bone density and load to failure for the transosseous repair ( R ² = 0.086; P = .83). Conclusion: Suture tape repair with knotless anchors for repair of patellar tendon rupture has comparable load to failure with less gap formation than transosseous suture repair. There is a small correlation between bone density and failure load for knotless anchor repair, which may benefit from further investigation. Clinical Relevance: Using knotless suture anchors for patellar tendon rupture repair would allow for a smaller incision, less dissection, and likely shorter operating time.