Meng Zhang

Dr. Meng Zhang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 August 2017 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TLTao Liu
Tao Liu
GZGuanghu Zhu
Guanghu Zhu
JHJianfeng He
Jianfeng He
TSTie Song
Tie Song
MZMeng Zhang
Meng Zhang
Wenjun MaWenjun Ma
Wenjun Ma
Dengue fever is a severe public heath challenge in south China. A dengue outbreak was reported in Chaozhou city, China in 2015. Intensified interventions were implemented by the government to control the epidemic. However, it is still unknown the degree to which intensified control measures reduced the size of the epidemics, and when should such measures be initiated to reduce the risk of large dengue outbreaks developing? We selected Xiangqiao district as study setting because the majority of the indigenous cases (90.6%) in Chaozhou city were from this district. The numbers of daily indigenous dengue cases in 2015 were collected through the national infectious diseases and vectors surveillance system, and daily Breteau Index (BI) data were reported by local public health department. We used a compartmental dynamic SEIR (Susceptible, Exposed, Infected and Removed) model to assess the effectiveness of control interventions, and evaluate the control effect of intervention timing on dengue epidemic. A total of 1250 indigenous dengue cases was reported from Xiangqiao district. The results of SEIR modeling using BI as an indicator of actual control interventions showed a total of 1255 dengue cases, which is close to the reported number (n = 1250). The size and duration of the outbreak were highly sensitive to the intensity and timing of interventions. The more rigorous and earlier the control interventions implemented, the more effective it yielded. Even if the interventions were initiated several weeks after the onset of the dengue outbreak, the interventions were shown to greatly impact the prevalence and duration of dengue outbreak. This study suggests that early implementation of rigorous dengue interventions can effectively reduce the epidemic size and shorten the epidemic duration.

1 January 2018 in Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HJHaimei Jia
Haimei Jia
MZMeng Zhang
Meng Zhang
MCMaoyu Chen
Maoyu Chen
ZYZhiwen Yang
Zhiwen Yang
JLJiansen Li
Jiansen Li
TSTie Song
Tie Song

11 January 2024 in Frontiers in Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LZLi Zhang
Li Zhang
FYFen Yang
Fen Yang
ZZZhihua Zhu
Zhihua Zhu
WZWeilin Zeng
Weilin Zeng
ZRZuhua Rong
Zuhua Rong
MZMeng Zhang
Meng Zhang
Background: The non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) against COVID-19 may have affected the transmission of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD). We aimed to assess the impact of the NPIs on HFMD in the high epidemic area of HFMD, Guangdong Province.Methods: The data of HFMD cases, etiological information, and meteorological factors in Guangdong from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021, were collected. Using a Bayesian structural time series (BSTS) model integrated counterfactual framework, we assessed the effect of NPIs on HFMD by different intervention periods, populations (gender, age, occupation), and cities. We further explored the correlation between the reduction of HFMD and socioeconomic factors in 21 cities.Results: A total of 351,217 HFMD cases were reported and 455,327 cases were averted in Guangdong Province during 2020–2021 with a reduction of 84.94% (95%CI: 81.63–87.22%) in 2020 and 29.49% (95%CI: 15.26–39.54%) in 2021. The impact of NPIs on HFMD differed by age and gender. The effects of NPIs were more remarkable for children aged 0–2 years and scattered children. We found that the relative reductions in 21 cities were related to the composition ratio of children and COVID-19 incidence.Conclusion: The reduction of HFMD incidence was significantly associated with COVID-19 NPIs, and school closure was an effective intervention to prevent HFMD outbreaks. Our findings will contribute to the development of HFMD prevention and control measures.

6 November 2020 in Research Square
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
XLXingchun Liu
Xingchun Liu
MZMeng Zhang
Meng Zhang
QCQu Cheng
Qu Cheng
YZYingtao Zhang
Yingtao Zhang
GYGuoqiang Ye
Guoqiang Ye
MKMin Kang
Min Kang
Background: Due to more mosquito habitats and the lack of basic mosquito control facilities, construction sites are more likely to have secondary cases after case importation, which may increase the number of cases in the neighborhood community and the chance of community transmission. This study aims to investigate how to effectively reduce the dengue transmission in construction sites and the neighboring communities.Methods: Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious/Asymptomatic-Recovered (SEIAR) model of human and SEI model of mosquitoes were developed to estimate the transmission of dengue virus between human and mosquitoes within the construction site and within a neighboring community, as well between them. With the calibrated model, we further estimated the effectiveness of different intervention scenarios targeting at reducing the transmissibility at different locations (i.e. construction sites and community) with the total attack rate (TAR) and the duration of the outbreak (DO).Results: A total of 102 construction site-related and 131 community-related cases of dengue were reported in our study area. Without intervention, the cases related to the construction site and the community rose to 156 (TAR: 31.25%) and 10796 (TAR: 21.59%). When cutting off the transmission route from mosquitoes to human in the community, the community cases decreased to a minimum of 33 compared with other simulated scenarios (TAR: 0.068%, DO: 60 days). If the transmission route from infectious mosquitoes in the community, and from the construction site to susceptible people on the site, was cut off at the same time, the cases in the construction site dropped to a minimum of 74 (TAR: 14.88%, DO: 66 days).Conclusions: To control the outbreak effectively for both the construction site and the community, interventions needed to be taken within the community and from the community to the construction site. If interventions were only taken within the construction site, this could not reduce the number of cases on the construction site. If interventions were taken within the construction site or between the construction site and the community, this could not lead to a reduction in the number of cases in the community.