Adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy improves response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We aimed to demonstrate decreased toxicity with metronomic chemotherapy/bevacizumab compared with paclitaxel/bevacizumab. This multicenter, randomized phase III trial compared bevacizumab with either paclitaxel (arm A) or daily oral capecitabine-cyclophosphamide (arm B) as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. The primary endpoint was the incidence of selected grade 3–5 adverse events (AE) including: febrile neutropenia, infection, sensory/motor neuropathy, and mucositis. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate, PFS, overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL), and pharmacoeconomics. The study was registered prospectively with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01131195 on May 25, 2010. Between September 2010 and December 2012, 147 patients were included at 22 centers. The incidence of primary endpoint-defining AEs was similar in arm A (25 % [18/71]; 95 % CI 15–35 %) and arm B (24 % [16/68]; 95 % CI 13–34 %; P = 0.96). Objective response rates were 58 % (42/73; 95 % CI 0.46–0.69) and 50 % (37/74; 95 % CI 0.39–0.61) in arms A and B, respectively (P = 0.45). Median PFS was 10.3 months (95 % CI 8.7–11.3) in arm A and 8.5 months (95 % CI 6.5–11.9) in arm B (P = 0.90). Other secondary efficacy endpoints were not significantly different between study arms. The only statistically significant differences in QoL were less hair loss and less numbness in arm B. Treatment costs between the two arms were equivalent. This trial failed to meet its primary endpoint of a reduced rate of prespecified grade 3–5 AEs with metronomic bevacizumab, cyclophosphamide and capecitabine.

The objectives were to describe patients' experiences of cancer care in Switzerland and explore the variation of these experiences by type of cancer. The Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences (SCAPE) study was a cross‐sectional, multicentre survey conducted in 2018. Adult patients (n = 7145) with breast, prostate, lung, colorectal, skin or haematological cancer from four large hospitals in French‐speaking Switzerland were invited to complete a survey. Logistic regressions were used to assess whether experiences varied according to cancer type, adjusting for confounders. Of the 3121 persons who returned the survey (44% response rate), 2755 reporting an eligible cancer were included in the analyses. Participants' average score for overall care was 8.5 out of a maximum score of 10. Higher rates of positive experiences were found for nurse consultations (94%), diagnostic tests (85%) and inpatient care (82%). Lower positive responses were reported for support for people with cancer (70%), treatment decisions (66%), diagnosis (65%) and home care (55%). We observed non‐systematic differences in experiences of care by cancer type. This large study identified that cancer patient experiences can be improved in relation to communication, information and supportive care aspects. Improvement efforts should target these areas of care to enhance responsiveness of cancer care.

Aflibercept plus FOLFIRI prolongs overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after the failure of oxaliplatin-containing therapy. QoLiTrap prospectively evaluated the quality of life (QoL) and effectiveness of this regimen in daily clinical practice, according to RAS status, sex, and prior targeted therapy, especially epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR-I). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients whose EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS) improved or reduced by <5% from baseline during the first 12 weeks of therapy. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. One thousand two hundred and seventy-seven patients were treated with aflibercept plus FOLFIRI and 872 were evaluable for QoL. GHS improved or decreased by <5% in 40.3% of cases. The ORR was 20.8%, the median PFS was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 7.3–8.3), and the median OS was 14.4 months (95% CI, 13.1–18.1). After prior EGFR-I, the ORR was 23.7%, median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 6.5–12.9), and median OS was 17.4 months (95% CI, 10.5–33.7). The safety profile was consistent with previously reported data. Aflibercept plus FOLFIRI given in daily practice maintained QoL in mCRC patients, was associated with a high objective tumor response, and retained its activity regardless of sex, RAS status, and prior EGFR-I therapy.

Background: Patient experience surveys gather information on various aspects of care via numerous survey items. Identifying the most critical areas of patient experience to prioritize for quality care improvement can be challenging. The objective of this study was to determine which care experience items are the drivers influencing patients' overall rating of cancer care.Methods: Data from 2750 adult patients with cancer from the second wave of the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences study were analyzed. This cross‐sectional survey was conducted in eight Swiss hospitals from September 2021 to February 2022. Stepwise logistic regression examined the relationship between overall care rating and 29 patient experience items covering different patient‐centered care dimensions while adjusting for sociodemographic and health variables.Results: Overall, patients rated their cancer care experience at 8.9 out of 10. Stepwise regression identified seven drivers contributing to overall care rating. The strongest drivers were “professionals worked well together” (odds ratio [OR], 4.81) and “tests were not repeated” (OR, 2.09) from the coordination and integration dimension, “offered support for symptoms during treatment” (OR, 2.11) from the physical comfort dimension, followed by “hospital staff ensured available home support” (OR, 1.99), “offered to see health professional for concerns” (OR, 1.91), “treatment options were explained” (OR, 1.75), and “involved in treatment decisions as desired” (OR, 1.68).Conclusions: This study evaluated the care experiences of patients with cancer with a comprehensive tool that identified seven key factors independently associated with overall care rating. By concentrating on these areas, hospitals can not only improve the patient care experience but also efficiently allocate resources to quality improvement initiatives.

Background/Objectives: Germ cell tumors are the most common neoplasia in males < 50 y. In two case series, thromboembolic events (TEs) were reported in 8% and 13% of patients undergoing chemotherapy, whereas arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs) in other types of cancer treated with cisplatin had a frequency of 2% in a retrospective series and 0.67% in a meta-analysis. Recent data found a frequency of 2.4% for ATE in a large cohort of testicular cancer patients. Risk factors are not clearly identified, and given the severity of these events, further exploration is needed to determine appropriate preventive measures. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 171 patients undergoing chemotherapy for germ cell tumors in two centers in Switzerland and recorded the occurrence of ATE or venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) during chemotherapy or in the 3 months after its completion. Results: of 171 patients, 33.3% underwent adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I disease. Overall, 32 patients had a TE (18.7%, 95% CI 13.3–25.5%), 26 (15.2%, 95% CI 10.3–21.7%) had VTEs, and 11 (6.4%, 95% CI 3.4–11.5%) had ATEs. Five patients had both a VTE and ATE. VTEs were associated with disease stage (II, III, or relapse, with OR 15.6, p = 0.0002), retroperitoneal lymph nodes ≥ 3.5 cm (OR 3.2, p = 0.012), LDH > 500 UI/L (OR 5.3, p = 0.0025), and age > 35 y (OR 3.4, p = 0.005). The Khorana Score (KS) varied between 1 and 2 in 96% of the patients. ATEs were associated with active smoking (OR 6.5 p = 0.010), KS of ≥2 (OR 6.4 p = 0.004), and age > 35 y (OR 6.3, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Our findings show that ATEs are more frequent in our cohort than previous reports. We found a strong association between smoking and ATEs, which should be further assessed. Platinum-induced endothelial damage may be amplified by smoking in young patients in the absence of other risk factors and preventive medication.

Une hémolyse (du mot grec : hémolysis : héma = sang + lysis = libération) est un terme médical qui décrit la destruction des globules rouges par des méc...