Feng Zhou

Dr. Feng Zhou

College of Geodesy and Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 January 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZHZunyao Hou
Zunyao Hou
Feng ZhouFeng Zhou
Feng Zhou
Nowadays, both BDS-3 and Galileo can provide global positioning and navigation services. This contribution carried out a comprehensive analysis and validation of positioning performance in terms of positioning accuracy (RMS) and convergence time, which are derived from BDS-3 and Galileo precise point positioning (PPP) solutions at a global scale. Meanwhile, the comparison with GPS was demonstrated. The performance and geographical distribution of RMS and convergence time for each satellite system were analyzed. GPS outperforms the other two systems on a global scale. Galileo and BDS-3, on the other hand, only perform moderately well in certain latitude zones. The combination of dual systems related to each single system is analyzed. For the dual-system combinations, the combination of systems presents a definite advantage over Galileo and BDS-3, and this advantage is more pronounced for the kinematic PPP. For GPS, the combination with Galileo and BDS-3 has little improvement in positioning performance. For the dual-system combination based on Galileo and BDS-3, the RMS and convergence time can be improved by 50% compared with the single system. The influence of single-system kinematic PPP selection for precise products from different MGEX analysis centers on positioning performance was studied. Among the five precise products, grg products have the best positioning performance for GPS, while cod products have the best positioning performance for Galileo and BDS-3. The difference in RMS and convergence time between 2 cm and 15 min can be caused by different precise product selections.

5 December 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Xiaoxing HeXiaoxing He
Xiaoxing He
JMJean-Philippe Montillet
Jean-Philippe Montillet
ZLZhao Li
Zhao Li
GKGael Kermarrec
Gael Kermarrec
RFRui Fernandes
Rui Fernandes
Feng ZhouFeng Zhou
Feng Zhou
Geodesy is the science of accurately measuring the topography of the earth (geometric shape and size), its orientation in space, and its gravity field. With the advances in our knowledge and technology, this scientific field has extended to the understanding of geodynamical phenomena such as crustal motion, tides, and polar motion. This Special Issue is dedicated to the recent advances in modelling geodetic time series recorded using various instruments. Due to the stochastic noise properties inherent in each of the time series, careful modelling is necessary in order to extract accurate geophysical information with realistic associated uncertainties (statistically sufficient). The analyzed data have been recorded with various space missions or ground-based instruments. It is impossible to be comprehensive in the vast and dynamic field that is Geodesy, particularly so-called “Environmental Geodesy”, which intends to understand the Earth’s geodynamics by monitoring any changes in our environment. This field has gained much attention in the past two decades due to the need by the international community to understand how climate change modifies our environment. Therefore, this Special Issue collects some articles which emphasize the recent development of specific algorithms or methodologies to study particular natural phenomena related to the geodynamics of the earth’s crust and climate change.

31 January 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Feng ZhouFeng Zhou
Feng Zhou
XWXiaoyang Wang
Xiaoyang Wang
Nowadays, BDS-3 and Galileo are still developing and have global service capabilities. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of pseudorange-based/single point positioning (SPP) among GPS, BDS-3, and Galileo on a global scale. First, the positioning accuracy distribution of adding IGSO and GEO to the MEO of BDS-3 is analyzed. The results show that after adding IGSO and GEO, the accuracy of 3D in the Asia-Pacific region is significantly improved. Then, the positioning accuracy of the single-system and single-frequency SPP was validated and compared. The experimental results showed that the median RMS values for the GPS, Galileo, and BDS-3 are 1.10/1.10/1.30 m and 2.57/2.69/2.71 m in the horizontal and vertical components, respectively. For the horizontal component, the GPS and Galileo had better positioning accuracy in the middle- and high-latitude regions, while BDS-3 had better positioning accuracy in the Asia-Pacific region. For the vertical component, poorer positioning accuracy could be seen near the North Pole and the equator for all three systems. Meanwhile, in comparison with the single-system and single-frequency SPP, the contribution of adding pseudorange observations from the other satellite system and frequency band was analyzed fully. Overall, the positioning accuracy can be improved to varying degrees. Due to the observation of noise amplification, the positioning errors derived from dual-frequency SPP were much noisier than those from single-frequency SPP. Moreover, the positioning performance of single-frequency SPP with the ionosphere delay corrected with CODE final (COD), rapid (COR), 1-day predicted (C1P), and 2-day predicted (C2P) global ionospheric map (GIM) products was investigated. The results showed that SPP with COD had the best positioning accuracy, SPP with COR ranked second, while C1P and C2P were comparable and slightly worse than SPP with COR. SPP with GIM products demonstrated a better positioning accuracy than that of the single- and dual-frequency SPP. The stability and variability of the inter-system biases (ISBs) derived from the single-frequency and dual-frequency SPP were compared and analyzed, demonstrating that they were stable in a short time. The differences in ISBs among different receivers with single-frequency SPP are smaller than that of dual-frequency SPP.

7 April 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZeyu Li
Zeyu Li
YLYong Liu
Yong Liu
Feng ZhouFeng Zhou
Feng Zhou
LWLI Xiao Wan
LI Xiao Wan
Achieving efficient and accurate feature tracking on event cameras is a fundamental step for practical high-level applications, such as simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) and structure from motion (SfM) and visual odometry (VO) in GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System)-denied environments. Although many asynchronous tracking methods purely using event flow have been proposed, they suffer from high computation demand and drift problems. In this paper, event information is still processed in the form of synthetic event frames to better adapt to the practical demands. Weighted fusion of multiple hypothesis testing with batch processing (WF-MHT-BP) is proposed based on loose integration of event, intensity, and inertial information. More specifically, with inertial information acting as priors, multiple hypothesis testing with batch processing (MHT-BP) produces coarse feature-tracking solutions on event frames in a batch processing way. With a time-related stochastic model, a weighted fusion mechanism fuses feature-tracking solutions from event and intensity frames compared with other state-of-the-art feature-tracking methods on event cameras. Evaluation on public datasets shows significant improvements on accuracy and efficiency and comparable performances in terms of feature-tracking length.