Stefano Brandani

Prof. Dr. Stefano Brandani

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 August 2021 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AFAmir H. Farmahini
Amir H. Farmahini
SKShreenath Krishnamurthy
Shreenath Krishnamurthy
Daniel FriedrichDaniel Friedrich
Daniel Friedrich
SBStefano Brandani
Stefano Brandani
LSLev Sarkisov
Lev Sarkisov
Computational screening methods have changed the way new materials and processes are discovered and designed. For adsorption-based gas separations and carbon capture, recent efforts have been directed toward the development of multiscale and performance-based screening workflows where we can go from the atomistic structure of an adsorbent to its equilibrium and transport properties at different scales, and eventually to its separation performance at the process level. The objective of this work is to review the current status of this new approach, discuss its potential and impact on the field of materials screening, and highlight the challenges that limit its application. We compile and introduce all the elements required for the development, implementation, and operation of multiscale workflows, hence providing a useful practical guide and a comprehensive source of reference to the scientific communities who work in this area. Our review includes information about available materials databases, state-of-the-art molecular simulation and process modeling tools, and a complete catalogue of data and parameters that are required at each stage of the multiscale screening. We thoroughly discuss the challenges associated with data availability, consistency of the models, and reproducibility of the data and, finally, propose new directions for the future of the field.

26 September 2012 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMagdalena M. Lozinska
Magdalena M. Lozinska
EMEnzo Mangano
Enzo Mangano
JMJohn P. S. Mowat
John P. S. Mowat
ASAshley M. Shepherd
Ashley M. Shepherd
RHRussell F. Howe
Russell F. Howe
PWPaul A. Wright
Paul A. Wright

1 August 2013 in International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HAHyungwoong Ahn
Hyungwoong Ahn
MLMauro Luberti
Mauro Luberti
ZLZhengyi Liu
Zhengyi Liu
SBStefano Brandani
Stefano Brandani

2 August 2019 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VGVeselina M. Georgieva
Veselina M. Georgieva
EBElliott L. Bruce
Elliott L. Bruce
MVMaarten C. Verbraeken
Maarten C. Verbraeken
ASAaron R. Scott
Aaron R. Scott
WCWilliam J. Casteel
William J. Casteel
PWPaul Anthony Wright
Paul Anthony Wright

1 February 2016 in Adsorption
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBStefano Brandani
Stefano Brandani
EMEnzo Mangano
Enzo Mangano
LSLev Sarkisov
Lev Sarkisov
The definitions of absolute, excess and net adsorption in microporous materials are used to identify the correct limits at zero and infinite pressure. Absolute adsorption is shown to be the fundamental thermodynamic property and methods to determine the solid density that includes the micropore volume are discussed. A simple means to define when it is necessary to distinguish between the three definitions at low pressure is presented. To highlight the practical implications of the analysis the case of adsorption of helium is considered in detail and a combination of experiments and molecular simulations is used to clarify how to interpret adsorption measurements for weakly adsorbed components.

20 November 2020 in Adsorption
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJin-Yu Wang
Jin-Yu Wang
EMEnzo Mangano
Enzo Mangano
SBStefano Brandani
Stefano Brandani
DRDouglas M. Ruthven
Douglas M. Ruthven
The availability of commercial gravimetric and volumetric systems for the measurement of adsorption equilibrium has seen also a growth of the use of these instruments to measure adsorption kinetics. A review of publications from the past 20 years has been used to assess common practice in 180 cases. There are worrying trends observed, such as lack of information on the actual conditions used in the experiment and the fact that the analysis of the data is often based on models that do not apply to the experimental systems used. To provide guidance to users of these techniques this contribution is divided into two parts: a discussion of the appropriate models to describe diffusion in porous materials is presented for different gravimetric and volumetric systems, followed by a structured discussion of the main trends in common practice uncovered reviewing a large number of recent publications. We conclude with recommendations for best practice to avoid incorrect interpretation of these experiments.