Wiebe De Vries

Dr. Wiebe De Vries

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2009 in Gait & Posture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WVWiebe De Vries
Wiebe De Vries
HVH.E.J. Veeger
H.E.J. Veeger
CBC.T.M. Baten
C.T.M. Baten
FHF.C.T. van der Helm
F.C.T. van der Helm

15 January 2004 in Ergonomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Marco HoozemansMarco Hoozemans
Marco Hoozemans
PKP. Paul F. M. Kuijer
P. Paul F. M. Kuijer
IKIdsart Kingma
Idsart Kingma
Jaap Van DieenJaap Van Dieen
Jaap Van Dieen
WVWiebe De Vries
Wiebe De Vries
MFMonique Hw Frings-Dresen
Monique Hw Frings-Dresen
The objective of this study was to quantify the mechanical load on the low back and shoulders during pushing and pulling in combination with three task constraints: the use of one or two hands, three cart weights, and two handle heights. The second objective was to explore the relation between the initial and sustained exerted forces and the mechanical load on the low back and shoulders. Detailed biomechanical models of the low back and shoulder joint were used to estimate mechanical loading. Using generalized estimating equations (GEE) the effects were quantified for exerted push/pull forces, net moments at the low back and shoulders, compressive and shear forces at the low back, and compressive forces at the glenohumeral joint. The results of this study appeared to be useful to estimate ergonomics consequences of interventions in the working constraints during pushing and pulling. Cart weight as well as handle height had a considerable effect on the mechanical load and it is recommended to maintain low cart weights and to push or pull at shoulder height. Initial and sustained exerted forces were not highly correlated with the mechanical load at the low back and shoulders within the studied range of the exerted forces.

1 July 2010 in Journal of Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WVWiebe De Vries
Wiebe De Vries
HVH.E.J. Veeger
H.E.J. Veeger
ACA.G. Cutti
A.G. Cutti
CBC. Baten
C. Baten
FHF.C.T. van der Helm
F.C.T. van der Helm

19 June 2008 in Ergonomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Marco HoozemansMarco Hoozemans
Marco Hoozemans
IKIdsart Kingma
Idsart Kingma
WVWiebe De Vries
Wiebe De Vries
Jaap Van DieenJaap Van Dieen
Jaap Van Dieen
The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of lifting height and mass lifted on the peak low back load in terms of net moments, compression forces and anterior–posterior shear forces. Ten participants had to lift a box using four handle heights. Low back loading was quantified using a dynamic 3-D linked segment model and a detailed electromyographic driven model of the trunk musculature. The effects of lifting height and lifting mass were quantified using a regression technique (GEE) for correlated data. Results indicate that an increase in lifting height and a decrease in lifting mass were related to a decrease in low back load. It is argued that trunk flexion is a major contributor to low back load. For ergonomic interventions it can be advised to prioritise optimisation of the vertical location of the load to be lifted rather than decreasing the mass of the load for handle heights between 32 cm and 155 cm, and for load masses between 7.5 and 15 kg. Lifting height and load mass are important determinants of low back load during manual materials handling. This paper provides the quantitative effect of lifting height and mass lifted, the results of which can be used by ergonomists at the workplace to evaluate interventions regarding lifting height and load mass.

14 August 2023 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WVWiebe De Vries
Wiebe De Vries
Rienk van der SlikkeRienk van der Slikke
Rienk van der Slikke
MDMarit Petronella Van Dijk
Marit Petronella Van Dijk
Ursina ArnetUrsina Arnet
Ursina Arnet
Daily wheelchair ambulation is seen as a risk factor for shoulder problems, which are prevalent in manual wheelchair users. To examine the long-term effect of shoulder load from daily wheelchair ambulation on shoulder problems, quantification is required in real-life settings. In this study, we describe and validate a comprehensive and unobtrusive methodology to derive clinically relevant wheelchair mobility metrics (WCMMs) from inertial measurement systems (IMUs) placed on the wheelchair frame and wheel in real-life settings. The set of WCMMs includes distance covered by the wheelchair, linear velocity of the wheelchair, number and duration of pushes, number and magnitude of turns and inclination of the wheelchair when on a slope. Data are collected from ten able-bodied participants, trained in wheelchair-related activities, who followed a 40 min course over the campus. The IMU-derived WCMMs are validated against accepted reference methods such as Smartwheel and video analysis. Intraclass correlation (ICC) is applied to test the reliability of the IMU method. IMU-derived push duration appeared to be less comparable with Smartwheel estimates, as it measures the effect of all energy applied to the wheelchair (including thorax and upper extremity movements), whereas the Smartwheel only measures forces and torques applied by the hand at the rim. All other WCMMs can be reliably estimated from real-life IMU data, with small errors and high ICCs, which opens the way to further examine real-life behavior in wheelchair ambulation with respect to shoulder loading. Moreover, WCMMs can be applied to other applications, including health tracking for individual interest or in therapy settings.

1 January 2016 in Journal of Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WVWiebe De Vries
Wiebe De Vries
HVH.E.J. Veeger
H.E.J. Veeger
CBC.T.M. Baten
C.T.M. Baten
FHF.C.T. van der Helm
F.C.T. van der Helm