Biochar has been used in various applications, e.g., as a soil conditioner and in remediation of contaminated water, wastewater, and gaseous emissions. In the latter application, biochar was shown to be a suitable alternative to activated carbon, providing high treatment efficiency. Since biochar is a by-product of waste pyrolysis, its use allows for compliance with circular economics. Thus, this research aims to obtain a detailed characterization of three carbonaceous materials: an activated carbon (CARBOSORB NC 1240®) and two biochars (RE-CHAR® and AMBIOTON®). In particular, the objective of this work is to compare the properties of three carbonaceous materials to evaluate whether the application of the two biochars is the same as that of activated carbon. The characterization included, among others, particle size distribution, elemental analysis, pH, scanning electron microscope, pore volume, specific surface area, and ionic exchange capacity. The results showed that CARBOSORB NC 1240® presented a higher specific surface (1126.64 m2/g) than AMBIOTON® (256.23 m2/g) and RE-CHAR® (280.25 m2/g). Both biochar and activated carbon belong to the category of mesoporous media, showing a pore size between 2 and 50 nm (20–500 Å). Moreover, the chemical composition analysis shows similar C, H, and N composition in the three carbonaceous materials while a higher O composition in RE-CHAR® (9.9%) than in CARBOSORB NC 1240 ® (2.67%) and AMBIOTON® (1.10%). Differences in physical and chemical properties are determined by the feedstock and pyrolysis or gasification temperature. The results obtained allowed to compare the selected materials among each other and with other carbonaceous adsorbents.
Chemical recycling is considered one of the most sustainable solutions to limit the environmental issues related to plastic waste pollution, whereby plastic is converted into more valuable compounds when mechanical recycling is not feasible. Among the most critical fast-growing components of municipal solid waste, polystyrene represents 1/3 of the filling materials in landfills. In this work, the chemical recycling of polystyrene via two main thermochemical processes is investigated: pyrolysis and hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). The influence of temperature (HTL: 300–360 °C and pyrolysis: 400–600 °C) and reaction time (HTL: 1–4 h; pyrolysis: 30 min) on the products obtained was studied. The obtained liquid and solid products were analyzed by using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), an elemental analysis (EA), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and a thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). During HTL, a temperature of 360 °C and reaction time of 4 h were needed to completely decompose the polystyrene into mainly oil (83%) and water-soluble compounds (10%). The former was mainly composed of aromatics while the water phase was mainly composed of aromatics and oxygenated compounds (benzaldehyde and acetophenone). The pyrolysis led to the formation of 45% gas and 55% oil at 500 °C, and the oil was 40% styrene. Pyrolysis was thus more selective towards the recovery of the styrene monomer while the HTL can be an effective process to produce renewable aromatics.