Maria V. Shatalina

Dr. Maria V. Shatalina

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 February 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMikhail Kulikov
Mikhail Kulikov
MBMikhail Belikovich
Mikhail Belikovich
NSNatalya K. Skalyga
Natalya K. Skalyga
MSMaria V. Shatalina
Maria V. Shatalina
SDSvetlana O. Dementyeva
Svetlana O. Dementyeva
AFAlexander M. Feigin
Alexander M. Feigin
In this work, we compare the values of 15 convective indices obtained from radiosonde and microwave temperature and water vapor profiles simultaneously measured over Nizhny Novgorod (56.2°N, 44°E) during 5 convective seasons of 2014–2018. A good or moderate correlation (with coefficients of ~0.7–0.85) is found for most indices. We assess the thunderstorm prediction skills with a lead time of 12 h for each radiosonde and microwave index. It is revealed that the effectiveness of thunderstorm prediction by microwave indices is much better than by radiosonde ones. Moreover, a good correlation between radiosonde and microwave values of a certain index does not necessarily correspond to similar prediction skills. Eight indices (Showalter Index, Maximum Unstable Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE), Total Totals index, TQ index, Jefferson Index, S index, K index, and Thompson index) are regarded to be the best predictors from both the true skill statistics (TSS) maximum and Heidke skill score (HSS) maximum points of view. In the case of radiosonde data, the best indices are the Jefferson Index, K index, S index, and Thompson index. Only TSS and HSS maxima for these indices are close to the microwave ones, whereas the prediction skills of other radiosonde indices are essentially worse than in the case of microwave data. The analysis suggests that the main possible reason of this discrepancy is an unexpectedly low quality of radiosonde data.

1 August 2019 in Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMaria V. Shatalina
Maria V. Shatalina
EME. A. Mareev
E. A. Mareev
VKV. V. Klimenko
V. V. Klimenko
FKF. A. Kuterin
F. A. Kuterin
KNK. A. Nicoll
K. A. Nicoll

1 April 2014 in Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VKV. V. Klimenko
V. V. Klimenko
EME. A. Mareev
E. A. Mareev
MSMaria V. Shatalina
Maria V. Shatalina
YSYu. V. Shlyugaev
Yu. V. Shlyugaev
VSV. V. Sokolov
V. V. Sokolov
VDV. P. Denisov
V. P. Denisov

2 April 2023 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDSvetlana O. Dementyeva
Svetlana O. Dementyeva
MSMaria V. Shatalina
Maria V. Shatalina
ABAlena Blagina
Alena Blagina
FSFedor Georgyevich Sarafanov
Fedor Georgyevich Sarafanov
MKMikhail Kulikov
Mikhail Kulikov
EMEvgeny Mareev
Evgeny Mareev
An increase in the frequency of atmospheric hazards in a changing climate has attracted interest in the study of regional features of mesoscale convective systems and trends of lightning activity. Severe convective storms are the most destructive weather events causing substantial damage and fatalities. In this paper, we analyze general trends in the lightning activity in the Upper Volga region and identify the particular features of a severe thunderstorm on 13–14 July 2020. The analysis of the annual variability of the lightning activity in the Upper Volga region, carried out according to the World-Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN) data, has shown that the total number of discharges during the convective seasons of 2016–2021 increased. For the convective season of 2020, the daily number of discharges in the neighborhood of Nizhny Novgorod (the center of the region) is calculated according to the WWLLN data and the electric field mill (EFM) measurements. It is revealed that the most powerful (per convective season) thunderstorms have a number of similarities both according to observations and numerical simulation. The thunderstorm on 13–14 July was numerically simulated using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model in combination with calculations of the electric parameters (such as electric potential and intracloud electric field). The simulations were carried out using two parametrizations of microphysical processes to reveal the features associated with allowance for aerosol particles. The data from the meteorological radar and WWLLN were used to validate the radar reflectivity simulation results of the WRF model. Some features of the thunderstorm evolution characteristic for each of the microphysical parametrizations were identified. In general, the non-aerosol parametrization gives a more correct description of the development of severe thunderstorms in the Upper Volga region (with the exception of the final stage of the convective system development). For a convective event to have the required duration (more than 6 h), aerosol particles should be taken into account.

1 December 2015 in Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAlexander Y. Kostinskiy
Alexander Y. Kostinskiy
VSVladimir S. Syssoev
Vladimir S. Syssoev
EMEugene A. Mareev
Eugene A. Mareev
VRVladimir A Rakov
Vladimir A Rakov
MAMikhail G. Andreev
Mikhail G. Andreev
MSMaria V. Shatalina
Maria V. Shatalina

29 October 2013 in Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SAS. V. Anisimov
S. V. Anisimov
EME. A. Mareev
E. A. Mareev
NSN. M. Shikhova
N. M. Shikhova
MSMaria V. Shatalina
Maria V. Shatalina
SGSergey Galichenko
Sergey Galichenko
SZS. S. Zilitinkevich
S. S. Zilitinkevich
Complex electrical measurements with the use of sodar data show that electric field pulsation analysis is useful for electrodynamics/turbulence monitoring under different conditions. In particular, the number of aeroelectric structures (AES) generated per hour is a convenient measure of the turbulence intensity. During convectively unstable periods, as many as 5–10 AES form per hour. Under stable conditions, AES occasionally form as well, indicating the appearance of occasional mixing events reflected in the electric field perturbations. AES magnitudes under stable conditions are relatively small, except in special cases such as high humidity and fog. The analysis of electric field (EF) spectra gives additional useful information on the parameters of the atmospheric boundary layer and its turbulence. A rather sharp change in the spectrum slope takes place in the vicinity of 0.02 Hz under stable conditions. The characteristic slope of the spectrum and its change are reproduced in a simple model of EF formation.