Vitor Paravidino

Dr. Vitor Paravidino

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 August 2022 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VPVitor Paravidino
Vitor Paravidino
TLTatiana Henriques Leite
Tatiana Henriques Leite
MMMauro Felippe Felix Mediano
Mauro Felippe Felix Mediano
RSRosely Sichieri
Rosely Sichieri
GSGulnar Azevedo e Silva
Gulnar Azevedo e Silva
PCPedro Cougo
Pedro Cougo
The present study aimed to evaluate the association between obesity and COVID-19 mortality and length of stay in ICU patients, and how these associations were modified by age groups. We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study with data obtained from a hospital-based registry. The sample consisted of 8183 ICU hospitalized patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Cox proportional models were used to evaluate the association between BMI categories and COVID-19 mortality and generalized linear models for the length of stay in the ICU. After adjusting for confounders, those in the younger group with severe obesity had an increased risk of COVID-19 mortality compared to those with normal/overweight (HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.01–1.61). An increased risk of death was also observed for patients with underweight (HR 3.74; 95% CI 1.39–10.07). For patients aged ≥ 60 year, mild/moderate obesity was associated with reduced mortality risk (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.78–0.97). For the age group < 60 year, the length of stay in ICU for those patients with severe obesity was 35% higher compared to the normal/overweight category (eβ 1.35; 95% CI 1.21–1.51). Conversely, for the survivors in the underweight category, the length of stay in ICU was 51% lower compared to the normal/overweight group (eβ 0.49; 95% CI 0.31–0.78). In the age group ≥ 60 year, mild/moderate obesity was associated with an increased length of stay in the ICU (eβ 1.10; 95% CI 1.01–1.21), adjusting for confounders. These findings could be helpful for health professionals to identify subgroups at higher risk for worse outcomes.

17 August 2016 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMichele Ribeiro Sgambato
Michele Ribeiro Sgambato
DCDiana Barbosa Cunha
Diana Barbosa Cunha
VHViviana T. Henriques
Viviana T. Henriques
CECamilla C. P. Estima
Camilla C. P. Estima
BSBárbara S. N. Souza
Bárbara S. N. Souza
RSRosely Sichieri
Rosely Sichieri
The prevalence of childhood obesity is increasing at a high rate in Brazil, making prevention a health priority. Schools are the central focus of interventions aiming the prevention and treatment of childhood obesity, however, randomized trials and cohort studies have not yet provided clear evidence of strategies to reduce prevalence of obesity. The aim of this study is to present a protocol to evaluate the efficacy of combining school and household level interventions to reduce excessive weight gain among students. The intervention target fifth and sixth graders from 18 public schools (9 interventions and 9 controls) in the municipality of Duque de Caxias, metropolitan area of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. A sample size of 2500 students will be evaluated at school for their weight status and those from the intervention group who are overweight or obese will be followed monthly at home by community health agents. Demographic, socioeconomic, anthropometric, eating behavior and food consumption data will be collected at school using a standardized questionnaire programmed in personal digital assistant. At school, all students from the intervention group will be encouraged to change eating habits and food consumption and to increase physical activity and reducing sedentary behavior. This study will provide evidence whether integration of school with primary health care can prevent excessive weight gain among adolescents. Positive results will inform a sustainable strategy to be disseminated in the health care system in Brazil. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02711488 . Date of registration: March 11, 2016.

15 January 2016 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VPVitor Paravidino
Vitor Paravidino
MMMauro Felippe Felix Mediano
Mauro Felippe Felix Mediano
DHDaniel J. Hoffman
Daniel J. Hoffman
RSRosely Sichieri
Rosely Sichieri
Evaluate the effect of different exercise intensities on spontaneous physical activity energy expenditure in overweight adolescents. A crossover study was developed with a control session, followed by moderate and vigorous exercise sessions, with six days of monitoring each. Twenty-four adolescents, 11–13 years old, male and overweight were selected. Spontaneous physical activity energy expenditure was assessed by accelerometers. Linear mixed effects models were used to evaluate the differences per session across time. Energy expenditure during the 1st hour was different between all three sessions, with averages of 82, 286 and 343 kcal to the control, moderate and vigorous sessions, respectively (p <0.001). The same pattern of difference in energy expenditure between the sessions remained after 24 hours (704 vs 970 vs 1056 kcal, p <0.001). However, energy expenditure during the six days indicates compensation from second to the sixth day, although small differences remained at the end of the 6-day period (5102 vs 5193 vs 5271 kcal, p <0.001). A single aerobic session seems to modify the spontaneous physical activities in overweight adolescents but still keeping the vigorous session with higher total energy expenditure during the follow-up period. Despite the observed compensatory effect, the greater energy expenditure observed in both moderate and vigorous exercise sessions indicates that physical activity should be recommended to promote an increased energy expenditure in adolescents. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 02272088

9 April 2024 in Jornal de Pediatria
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NMNathalia Veiga Moliterno
Nathalia Veiga Moliterno
VPVitor Paravidino
Vitor Paravidino
JRJaqueline Rodrigues Robaina
Jaqueline Rodrigues Robaina
FLFernanda Lima-Setta
Fernanda Lima-Setta
ACAntonio Jose Ledo Alves da Cunha
Antonio Jose Ledo Alves da Cunha
MMMaria Clara de Magalhães-Barbosa
Maria Clara de Magalhães-Barbosa
To evaluate the effect of high-fidelity simulation of pediatric emergencies compared to case-based discussion on the development of self-confidence, theoretical knowledge, clinical reasoning, communication, attitude, and leadership in undergraduate medical students. 33 medical students were allocated to two teaching methods: high-fidelity simulation (HFS, n = 18) or case-based discussion (CBD, n = 15). Self-confidence and knowledge tests were applied before and after the interventions and the effect of HFS on both outcomes was estimated with mixed-effect models. An Objective Structured Clinical Examination activity was conducted after the interventions, while two independent raters used specific simulation checklists to assess clinical reasoning, communication, attitude, and leadership. The effect of HFS on these outcomes was estimated with linear and logistic regressions. The effect size was estimated with the Hedge's g. Both groups had an increase in self-confidence (HFS 59.1 × 93.6, p < 0.001; CDB 50.5 × 88.2, p < 0.001) and knowledge scores over time (HFS 45.1 × 63.2, p = 0.001; CDB 43.5 × 56.7, p-value < 0.01), but no difference was observed between groups (group*time effect in the mixed effect models adjusted for the student ranking) for both tests (p = 0.6565 and p = 0.3331, respectively). The simulation checklist scores of the HFS group were higher than those of the CBD group, with large effect sizes in all domains (Hedges g 1.15 to 2.20). HFS performed better than CBD in developing clinical reasoning, communication, attitude, and leadership in undergraduate medical students in pediatric emergency care, but no significant difference was observed in self-confidence and theoretical knowledge.

1 January 2021 in Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VPVitor Paravidino
Vitor Paravidino
RSRosely Sichieri
Rosely Sichieri
DGDanilo Cosme Klein Gomes
Danilo Cosme Klein Gomes
GSGulnar Azevedo e Silva
Gulnar Azevedo e Silva
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the proportion of deaths among hospitalized cases of COVID-19 in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, stratified by private and public services. Methods: Hospitalization data for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) were obtained using the SIVEP-Gripe Database. All hospitalized adults who were diagnosed as COVID-19 or unspecified SARS, between January and December 2020, were included in the analysis. Logistic regression models were fitted to evaluate the risk of death between Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities. Results: A total of 388,657 hospital registers for Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo (91,532 and 297,125, respectively) were analyzed. Missing data are frequent in the database and it was greater in Rio de Janeiro, at the state and capital levels. Adjusting for confounders, the odds ratio of dying by COVID-19, comparing the state of Rio de Janeiro with São Paulo, was 2.51 in the private hospitals and 2.29 in the public ones. For the capitals, the scenario is worse. The lethality among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is at least twice in Rio de Janeiro than São Paulo, both at the states and capitals. The public or private services showed important differences, with odds ratios of 2.74 and 3.46, respectively. Conclusion: It appears that the worst governance in the health sector in Rio de Janeiro, more than lack of resources, explains the excess mortality of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Rio de Janeiro.

1 December 2022 in Epigenomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GCGeorgia Chalfun
Georgia Chalfun
ABAline de Araújo Brasil
Aline de Araújo Brasil
VPVitor Paravidino
Vitor Paravidino
SLSheila Lima
Sheila Lima
MLMonique de Souza Almeida Lopes
Monique de Souza Almeida Lopes
MMMaria Clara de Magalhães-Barbosa
Maria Clara de Magalhães-Barbosa
Aim: To describe NR3C1 exon-1F methylation and cortisol levels in newborns. Materials & methods: Preterm ≤1500 g and full-term infants were included. Samples were collected at birth and at days 5, ... Plain language summary We investigated the methylation of a gene, NR3C1 exon-1F, and cortisol levels in newborns. DNA methylation is a biochemical process that can modify gene activity. In the case... Tweetable abstract Preterm infants have higher rates of NR3C1 gene methylation and cortisol levels at birth than term infants, but this difference reverses over time in the first 3 months of life. ...