Andre J. van Wijnen

Prof. Andre J. van Wijnen

Department of Biochemistry, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 October 2017 in Stem Cells Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRebekah Margaret Samsonraj
Rebekah Margaret Samsonraj
Michael RaghunathMichael Raghunath
Michael Raghunath
VNVictor Nurcombe
Victor Nurcombe
JHJames H. Hui
James H. Hui
Andre J. van WijnenAndre J. van Wijnen
Andre J. van Wijnen
SCSimon M. Cool
Simon M. Cool
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) hold great potential for regenerative medicine because of their ability for self-renewal and differentiation into tissue-specific cells such as osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. MSCs orchestrate tissue development, maintenance and repair, and are useful for musculoskeletal regenerative therapies to treat age-related orthopedic degenerative diseases and other clinical conditions. Importantly, MSCs produce secretory factors that play critical roles in tissue repair that support both engraftment and trophic functions (autocrine and paracrine). The development of uniform protocols for both preparation and characterization of MSCs, including standardized functional assays for evaluation of their biological potential, are critical factors contributing to their clinical utility. Quality control and release criteria for MSCs should include cell surface markers, differentiation potential, and other essential cell parameters. For example, cell surface marker profiles (surfactome), bone-forming capacities in ectopic and orthotopic models, as well as cell size and granularity, telomere length, senescence status, trophic factor secretion (secretome), and immunomodulation, should be thoroughly assessed to predict MSC utility for regenerative medicine. We propose that these and other functionalities of MSCs should be characterized prior to use in clinical applications as part of comprehensive and uniform guidelines and release criteria for their clinical-grade production to achieve predictably favorable treatment outcomes for stem cell therapy. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2017;6:2173–2185

16 November 2022 in Biosensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GGghazaleh gharib
ghazaleh gharib
İBİsmail Bütün
İsmail Bütün
ZMZülal Muganlı
Zülal Muganlı
GKgül kozalak
gül kozalak
İNİlayda Namlı
İlayda Namlı
Ali KosarAli Kosar
Ali Kosar
Both passive and active microfluidic chips are used in many biomedical and chemical applications to support fluid mixing, particle manipulations, and signal detection. Passive microfluidic devices are geometry-dependent, and their uses are rather limited. Active microfluidic devices include sensors or detectors that transduce chemical, biological, and physical changes into electrical or optical signals. Also, they are transduction devices that detect biological and chemical changes in biomedical applications, and they are highly versatile microfluidic tools for disease diagnosis and organ modeling. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the significant advances that have been made in the development of microfluidics devices. We will discuss the function of microfluidic devices as micromixers or as sorters of cells and substances (e.g., microfiltration, flow or displacement, and trapping). Microfluidic devices are fabricated using a range of techniques, including molding, etching, three-dimensional printing, and nanofabrication. Their broad utility lies in the detection of diagnostic biomarkers and organ-on-chip approaches that permit disease modeling in cancer, as well as uses in neurological, cardiovascular, hepatic, and pulmonary diseases. Biosensor applications allow for point-of-care testing, using assays based on enzymes, nanozymes, antibodies, or nucleic acids (DNA or RNA). An anticipated development in the field includes the optimization of techniques for the fabrication of microfluidic devices using biocompatible materials. These developments will increase biomedical versatility, reduce diagnostic costs, and accelerate diagnosis time of microfluidics technology.

23 April 2013 in Current Osteoporosis Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Andre J. van WijnenAndre J. van Wijnen
Andre J. van Wijnen
JPJeroen van de Peppel
Jeroen van de Peppel
JLJohannes P.T.M. Van Leeuwen
Johannes P.T.M. Van Leeuwen
JLJane B. Lian
Jane B. Lian
GSGary S Stein
Gary S Stein
SKSanjeev Kakar
Sanjeev Kakar

1 January 2004
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJane B Lian
Jane B Lian
AJAmjad Javed
Amjad Javed
SZS Kaleem Zaidi
S Kaleem Zaidi
CLChristopher Lengner
Christopher Lengner
MMMartin Montecino
Martin Montecino
GSGary S Stein
Gary S Stein

16 December 2014 in Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ELEric Alexander Lewallen
Eric Alexander Lewallen
SRScott M. Riester
Scott M. Riester
CBCarolina A. Bonin
Carolina A. Bonin
HKHilal Maradit Kremers
Hilal Maradit Kremers
ADAmel Dudakovic
Amel Dudakovic
Andre J. van WijnenAndre J. van Wijnen
Andre J. van Wijnen
The biological interface between an orthopedic implant and the surrounding host tissue may have a dramatic effect upon clinical outcome. Desired effects include bony ingrowth (osseointegration), stimulation of osteogenesis (osteoinduction), increased vascularization, and improved mechanical stability. Implant loosening, fibrous encapsulation, corrosion, infection, and inflammation, as well as physical mismatch may have deleterious clinical effects. This is particularly true of implants used in the reconstruction of load-bearing synovial joints such as the knee, hip, and the shoulder. The surfaces of orthopedic implants have evolved from solid-smooth to roughened-coarse and most recently, to porous in an effort to create a three-dimensional architecture for bone apposition and osseointegration. Total joint surgeries are increasingly performed in younger individuals with a longer life expectancy, and therefore, the postimplantation lifespan of devices must increase commensurately. This review discusses advancements in biomaterials science and cell-based therapies that may further improve orthopedic success rates. We focus on material and biological properties of orthopedic implants fabricated from porous metal and highlight some relevant developments in stem-cell research. We posit that the ideal primary and revision orthopedic load-bearing metal implants are highly porous and may be chemically modified to induce stem cell growth and osteogenic differentiation, while minimizing inflammation and infection. We conclude that integration of new biological, chemical, and mechanical methods is likely to yield more effective strategies to control and modify the implant–bone interface and thereby improve long-term clinical outcomes.

1 November 2015 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADAmel Dudakovic
Amel Dudakovic
ECEmily T. Camilleri
Emily T. Camilleri
FXFuhua Xu
Fuhua Xu
SRScott M. Riester
Scott M. Riester
MMMeghan McGee-Lawrence
Meghan McGee-Lawrence
Andre J. van WijnenAndre J. van Wijnen
Andre J. van Wijnen
Epigenetic control of gene expression is critical for normal fetal development. However, chromatin-related mechanisms that activate bone-specific programs during osteogenesis have remained underexplored. Therefore, we investigated the expression profiles of a large cohort of epigenetic regulators (>300) during osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal cells derived from the stromal vascular fraction of adipose tissue (AMSCs). Molecular analyses establish that the polycomb group protein EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2) is down-regulated during osteoblastic differentiation of AMSCs. Chemical inhibitor and siRNA knockdown studies show that EZH2, a histone methyltransferase that catalyzes trimethylation of histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3), suppresses osteogenic differentiation. Blocking EZH2 activity promotes osteoblast differentiation and suppresses adipogenic differentiation of AMSCs. High throughput RNA sequence (mRNASeq) analysis reveals that EZH2 inhibition stimulates cell cycle inhibitory proteins and enhances the production of extracellular matrix proteins. Conditional genetic loss of Ezh2 in uncommitted mesenchymal cells (Prrx1-Cre) results in multiple defects in skeletal patterning and bone formation, including shortened forelimbs, craniosynostosis, and clinodactyly. Histological analysis and mRNASeq profiling suggest that these effects are attributable to growth plate abnormalities and premature cranial suture closure because of precocious maturation of osteoblasts. We conclude that the epigenetic activity of EZH2 is required for skeletal patterning and development, but EZH2 expression declines during terminal osteoblast differentiation and matrix production.