Preservation technologies for winemaking have relied mainly on the addition of sulfur dioxide (SO₂), in consequence of the large spectrum of action of this compound, linked to the control of undesirable microorganisms and the prevention of oxidative phenomena. However, its potential negative effects on consumer health have addressed the interest of the international research on alternative treatments to substitute or minimize the SO₂ content in grape must and wine. This review is aimed at analyzing chemical methods, both traditional and innovative, useful for the microbiological stabilization of wine. After a preliminary description of the antimicrobial and technological properties of SO₂, the additive traditionally used during wine production, the effects of the addition (in must and wine) of other compounds officially permitted in winemaking, such as sorbic acid, dimethyl dicarbonate (DMDC), lysozyme and chitosan, are discussed and evaluated. Furthermore, other substances showing antimicrobial properties, for which the use for wine microbiological stabilization is not yet permitted in EU, are investigated. Even if these treatments exhibit a good efficacy, a single compound able to completely replace SO₂ is not currently available, but a combination of different procedures might be useful to reduce the sulfite content in wine. Among the strategies proposed, particular interest is directed towards the use of insect-based chitosan as a reliable alternative to SO₂, mainly due to its low environmental impact. The production of wines containing low sulfite levels by using pro-environmental practices can meet both the consumers’ expectations, who are even more interested in the healthy traits of foods, and wine-producers’ needs, who are interested in the use of sustainable practices to promote the profile of their brand.

Chitosan is used as an antimicrobial agent in different agri-food applications; in winemaking, the use of chitosan from Aspergillus niger is authorized, but other sources of chitin, and consequently of chitosan, are available, such as crustaceans and insects. This work investigates the antimicrobial efficiency of chitosan from crustaceans and insects (Hermetia illucens) against non-Saccharomyces yeasts in wine. For this aim, the first step was to evaluate the effect of crustacean chitosan, tested both alone and in combination with low sulphur dioxide (SO₂) concentrations, on the cell viability of 20 non-Saccharomyces strains in the first step of fermentations inoculated with each strain. Furthermore, the strain resistance to crustacean- and insect-based chitosan was evaluated in agarized media, together with the addition of different antimicrobial concentrations. Finally, the efficiency of different antimicrobial treatments was evaluated during laboratory-scale fermentations inoculated with a selected S. cerevisiae strain. The tested strains exhibited medium/high resistance to the chitosan; in some cases, the behaviour varied in the function of species/strain, and only four strains exhibited different resistance levels, depending on the chitosan source. The addition of chitosan alone during fermentation inoculated with S. cerevisiae showed lower antimicrobial activity than SO₂, but the combined use with SO₂ showed a better effect than chitosan alone. The evaluation of the suitability of chitosan obtained from a sustainable source, such as insects, will allow us to give new information on the future applications of this natural compound for the production of wine with low sulphite content.