Since the launch of CFOSAT on 29 October 2018, more than three years of observational data of ocean wave spectra with a frequency range of 0.02–0.26 Hz and a horizontal resolution of 70–90 km have been obtained. This study compares wave spectra retrieved from 6°, 8°, and 10° incidence angle beams and their combination provided by CFOSAT with corresponding data from 98 buoys from the National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) in order to validate the remote sensing wave spectral accuracy from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2022. The correlation coefficient of frequency spectra (Rs) between CFOSAT and buoys is used to represent the accuracy of the spectral form; the root mean square (RMS) of the significant wave height (SWH) is used to represent the accuracy of the total energy. The results indicate that CFOSAT can retrieve reliable wave frequency spectral forms with a high significant wave height (Rs > 0.8 when SWH > 3 m; RS < 0.4 when SWH < 1 m). The low-frequency noise in the swell part causes the main error, the RMS of the swell height is 0.4 m whereas the RMS of wind wave height is 0.24 m, and the mask filter used for spectral partitioned provided by CFOSAT can eliminate the low-frequency noise and improve the Rs of 10° beam wave spectra from 0.59 to 0.64. For the wind wave spectra, the correct spectra have been achieved and the mask filter cannot improve the accuracy. The wave spectra from the 10° beam without mask filtering provides the best estimation of total energy, the RMS of SWH is 0.23 m, after the mask filtering, the best estimation of spectral form can be achieved, the Rs is 0.64. The novelty of this study is that we found the strong correlation between SWH and Rs, where the scatter of SWH and Rs can be fitted as: Rs = 1 − exp(−0.89·SWH + 0.20); according to this approximate formula, we can estimate the reliability of wave spectra provided by CFOSAT according to the SWH in any region, which is important for wave spectral assimilation in the numerical model. The validation of wave direction indicates that the accuracy of wave spectra in the directional component is poor; further research is needed on the causes of directional errors. Generally, this study is not only an evaluation of the quality of the CFOSAT spectral data, but also an important reference for a series of research requiring the CFOSAT spectral data.
17 August 2021 in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
The China France Oceanography Satellite (CFOSAT) was launched on October 29, 2018, and is equipped with two sensors: a space-borne rotating fan beam scatterometer (CSCAT) and a space-borne surface wave investigation and monitoring (SWIM) radar. The CSCAT is dedicated to monitoring sea surface winds (SSWs), and the SWIM radar is designed to measure surface ocean waves. In this study, CSCAT SSW products during global tropical cyclones (TCs) were validated using wind data from multiple sources, including European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWFs) reanalysis (ERA5), cross-calibrated multi-platform (CCMP), soil moisture active passive (SMAP), WindSat, HY-2B, advanced scatterometer (ASCAT), and buoy wind. Wave parameters (significant wave height (SWH), dominant direction, and wavelength) were validated using wave data from ERA5, Jason3, and the HY-2B altimeter. The results show the following: 1) errors of the CFOSAT wind speed (WS) and SWH increase with the enhancement of TC intensity; 2) the WS accuracy of wind vector cells (WVCs) near the nadir is better than that at the nadir and the edge of the swath; 3) the wind direction (WD) correlation between the CSCAT and ERA5, ASCAT, and WindSat is more obvious at high WSs (>20 m/s) than at lower WSs (< 6 m/s); 4) the accuracy of the SWIM off-nadir SWH product is lower than that of the nadir SWH; and 5) a triple collocation comparison among the CFOSAT SSW, ERA5 SSW, and WindSat SSW indicates that the CFOSAT SSW provides the best performance.
Scatterometers are dedicated to monitoring sea surface wind vectors, but they also provide valuable data for polar applications. As a new type of scatterometer, the rotating fan beam scatterometer delivers a higher diversity of incidence angles and more azimuth sampling. The paper takes the first rotating fan beam scatterometer, the China France Oceanography Satellite scatterometer (CSCAT), as an example to explore the effectiveness of this new type of scatterometer in polar sea ice detection. In this paper, a Bayesian method with consideration of geometric characteristics of CSCAT is developed for sea ice detection. The implementation of this method includes the definition of CSCAT backscatter space, an estimation of the sea ice Physical Model Function (GMF), a calculation of the sea ice backscatter distance to the sea ice GMF, a probability distribution function (PDF) estimation of the square distance to the GMF (sea ice GMF and wind GMF), and a calculation of the sea ice Bayesian posterior probability. This algorithm was used to generate a daily CSCAT polar sea ice mask during the CSCAT mission period (2019–2022) (by setting a 55% threshold on the Bayesian posterior probability). The sea ice masks were validated against passive microwaves by quantitatively comparing the sea ice edges and extents. The validation suggests that the CSCAT sea ice edge and extent show good agreement with the sea ice concentration distribution (i.e., sea ice concentration ≥ 15%) of the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2). The average Euclidean distance of the sea ice edges was basically less than 12.5 km, and the deviation of the sea ice extents was less than 0.3 × 106 km2.
The operational wind processor for the Ku-band scatterometers onboard HY-2 satellite series uses a quality control (QC) scheme based on the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE). Since it is difficult to discriminate rain contamination from “true” high winds, the MLE-based wind QC is set in a conservative way, which rejects up to ~35% of high winds (w ≥ 20 m/s) in HY-2 scatterometers (HSCATs). In this paper, the sensitivity of MLE and its spatially averaged value (i.e., MLEm) to wind quality and rain is reconsidered by analyzing the collocated HSCAT observations and buoy data, as well as rain data from the global precipitation measurement satellite’s microwave imagers. It shows that MLEm is more effective than MLE in terms of flagging rain data. More interestingly, the HSCAT high winds are much less strongly affected by rain, compared to the prior Ku-band pencil-beam scatterometers (e.g., RapidScat). Consequently, a MLEm-based approach is proposed to improve the HSCAT wind QC, particularly for high winds. The new QC method results in ~8% rejections at 20 m/s and above. Compared to the collocated buoy winds, the HSCAT high winds preserved by the new QC (but rejected by the operational QC) are of fairly good quality.
Polar sea ice extent exhibits a highly dynamic nature. This paper investigates the sea ice extent retrieval on a fine (6.25 km) grid based on the 12.5 km sampling data from the China France Ocean Satellite Scatterometer (CSCAT), which is generated by an adapted Bayesian sea ice detection algorithm. The CSCAT 12.5 km sampling data are analyzed, a corresponding sea ice GMF model is established, and the important calculation procedures and parameter settings of the adapted Bayesian algorithm for CSCAT 12.5 km sampling data are elaborated on. The evolution of the sea ice edge and extent based on CSCAT 12.5 km sampling data from 2020 to 2022 is introduced and quantitatively compared with sea ice extent products of Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) and the Advanced Scatterometer onboard MetOp-C (ASCAT-C). The results suggest the sea ice extent of CSCAT 12.5 km sampling data has good consistency with AMSR2 at 15% sea ice concentration. The sea ice edge accuracy between them is about 7 km and 10 km for the Arctic and Antarctic regions, and their sea ice extent difference is 0.25 million km2 in 2020 and 0.5 million km2 in 2021 and 2022. Compared to ASCAT-C 12.5 km sampling data, the sea ice edge Euclidean distance (ED) of CSCAT 12.5 km data is 14 km (2020 and 2021) and 12.5 km (2022) for the Arctic region and 14 km for the Antarctic region. The sea ice extent difference between them is small except for January to May 2020 and 2021 for the Arctic region. There are significant deviations in the sea ice extents of CSCAT 12.5 km and 25 km sampling data, and their sea ice extent difference is 0.3–1.0 million km2.
Scatterometers are highlighted in polar applications, such as sea ice extent retrieval. There are currently three types of spaceborne scatterometer in operation, among which the rotating pencil beam scatterometer and the rotating fan beam scatterometer have similar rotating observation geometry, but different beam sampling. However, it is difficult to objectively evaluate the performance of the two rotating beam scatterometers using the obtained data. This is because there are significant differences in their system parameters, which in turn affects the objectivity of the evaluation. Considering the high flexibility of the rotating fan beam scatterometer, this study proposes a dual-mode sea ice extent retrieval method for the rotating fan beam scatterometer. The dual modes refer to the rotating fan beam mode (or full incidence mode) and the equivalent rotating pencil beam mode (or single incidence mode). The two modes share the same system and spatiotemporal synchronous backscatter measurements provide the possibility of objectively comparing the rotating pencil beam and rotating fan beam scatterometers. The comparison, validation, and evaluation of the dual-mode sea ice extent of China France Oceanography Satellite Scatterometer (CSCAT) were performed. The results indicate that the sea ice extent retrieval of the equivalent rotating pencil beam mode of the rotating fan beam scatterometer is realizable, and compared to the existing rotating pencil beam scatterometers (such as the OceanSat Scatterometer on ScatSat-1, OSCAT, on ScatSat-1, and the Hai Yang 2B Scatterometer, HSCAT-B), the derived sea ice extent is closer to that of Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2). For the two modes of CSCAT, when compared to AMSR2, the sea ice extent of the CSCAT full incidence mode has smaller values of root mean squared error (RMSE), error-of-ice (EI), and ice edge location distance (LD) than those of the CSCAT single incidence mode. These suggest that the rotating fan beam scatterometer shows better observation abilities for sea ice extent than the rotating pencil beam scatterometers.