Objective. Novel therapeutics and supportive care improved outcomes for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients. Major advances over the past five decades include the introduction of combination chemotherapy, small molecules targeting mutant proteins, especially EGFR, and more recently immunotherapy. We aim to document real-world long-term survival over the past five decades. Methods. Survival statistics were extracted from the Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for mNSCLC patients during 19732015. Two- and five-year survival (2yS and 5yS) were analyzed using KaplanMeier and proportional hazard models. Results. The study population consisted of 280,655mNSCLC patients diagnosed during 19732015. Longer survival was seen in younger, female, married, Asian/Pacific Islander race, adenocarcinoma, lower grade, more recent diagnosis, higher income, and chemotherapy-treated patients. 2yS increased during the study period from 2.6 to 12.9, and 5yS increased from 0.7 to 3.2. 2yS of patients <50 years of age rose from 2.1 to 22.8, and their 5yS rose from 0.7 to 6.2. 2yS of adenocarcinoma patients improved from 2.7 to 16.2, and their improved 5yS from 1.1 to 3.9. Conclusions. Between 1973 and 2015, there was a dramatic improvement in long-term survival, with an approximately five-fold increase in both 2yS and 5yS. Nonetheless, absolute numbers of long-term survivors remained low, with less than 4 living 5 years. This provides a baseline to compare long-term outcomes seen in the current generation of clinical trials.

Despite advances in the management of solid tumours, the development of metastases continues to be the most significant problem and cause of death for cancer patients. To define genetic determinants of pulmonary metastases, we have applied oligonucleotide microarrays to established murine models of highly metastatic D122 Lewis lung carcinoma and B16-F10.9 melanoma cell lines. These models are characterised by primary subcutaneous growth in C57BL/6J mice, a period of minimal residual disease and spontaneous pulmonary metastases. Microarray analysis defined seven genes, namely – arginase, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1 alpha), plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 (PAI-2), surfactant protein C (SP-C), uteroglobin (UG) and wnt-1-induced secreted protein-1 (WISP-1), which were consistently elevated in pulmonary metastases compared to the primary tumour of both D122 and B16-F10.9 models. Previous studies demonstrated that two of these seven genes, IL-1 alpha and PAI-2, are involved in the metastatic process. The results obtained by the microarrays were confirmed by real-time quantitative PCR, for three chosen genes – PAI-2, WISP-1 and UG. Our approach aimed to identify genes essential for the metastatic process in general and for pulmonary metastases specifically. Further research should address the precise role of these genes in the metastasising process to the lungs and test if they could be used as targets for future therapies.

HIG2 (hypoxia-inducible gene 2) is a biomarker of hypoxia and elevated in several cancers. Here, we show that HIG2 also upregulated HIF-1α expression under hypoxic conditions and enhanced AP-1 expression under normoxic conditions, which affects colorectal cancer cell survival. Importantly, over-expression of HIG2 promoted tumor growth by suppressing apoptosis in a mouse orthotopic model. These results are likely relevant to human disease since we found that the expression of HIG2 is gradually elevated as tumors progress. Collectively, these findings suggest that HIG2 plays an important role in promoting colorectal cancer growth in hypoxia-dependent and independent manners.

Background: Patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) show marked sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Dual PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade with nivolumab and ipilimumab showed superior progression-free survival (PFS) over chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 monotherapy, but data on treatment-naïve patients is not available yet. Methods: This international multicenter study included patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC receiving either chemotherapy with or without biologics, or anti-PD-1 monotherapy, or dual PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade as a first-line treatment. Data were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to account for baseline imbalances. IPTW-adjusted survival and subgroup analyses were conducted. Results: Among 711 patients, 51.2% received chemotherapy with or without biologics, 37.1% anti-PD-1 monotherapy, and 11.7% dual checkpoint blockade. Anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy significantly improved PFS (HR: 0.14; p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.13; p < 0.001) versus chemotherapy. In first-line IPTW-adjusted analyses (median follow-up: 29.2 months), dual blockade showed superior PFS over PD-1 monotherapy (HR: 0.58, 95%CI 0.35-0.97, p = 0.037), with a favorable OS trend (HR: 0.61, 95%CI 0.33-1.14, p = 0.12), and higher objective response rate (ORR) (71.5% vs 55.5%; OR: 1.15; 95%CI 1.03-1.29; p = 0.016) and disease control rate (DCR) (93.7% vs 75.8%; OR, 1.18; 95%CI 1.08-1.28; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses suggested greater benefit in patients with left-sided and BRAF mutated tumors, while those with right-sided BRAF wild-type status showed no incremental benefit from dual ICI. Toxicity profile was manageable for both ICI regimen, with grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events registered in 11.9% and 15.7% cases in anti-PD-1 monotherapy and anti-CTLA-4 combination groups, respectively. Conclusions: First-line dual PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade demonstrated superior efficacy over anti-PD-1 monotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H mCRC regardless of clinical variables. Compared to previous published data across treatment lines, the prognostic impact of several clinical features does not seem to be retained in patients treated upfront with ICIs combination.