Mohammad Rezasefat

Mr. Mohammad Rezasefat

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2021 in Thin-Walled Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMohammad Rezasefat
Mohammad Rezasefat
AGAlvaro Gonzalez-Jimenez
Alvaro Gonzalez-Jimenez
MGM. Giglio
M. Giglio
Andrea ManesAndrea Manes
Andrea Manes

23 December 2015 in Applied Physics A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Hamed RajabiHamed Rajabi
Hamed Rajabi
MRMohammad Rezasefat
Mohammad Rezasefat
ADA. Darvizeh
A. Darvizeh
JDJ.-H. Dirks
J.-H. Dirks
SESh. Eshghi
Sh. Eshghi
SGS. N. Gorb
S. N. Gorb

2 March 2023 in Composite Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMohammad Rezasefat
Mohammad Rezasefat
DMDayou Ma
Dayou Ma
ASAmanda A.X. da Silva
Amanda A.X. da Silva
Chiara ColomboChiara Colombo
Chiara Colombo
SASandro Campos Amico
Sandro Campos Amico
Andrea ManesAndrea Manes
Andrea Manes

1 December 2023 in Machine Learning: Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMohammad Rezasefat
Mohammad Rezasefat
JHJames D. Hogan
James D. Hogan
This study presents a data-driven finite element-machine learning surrogate model for predicting the end-to-end full-field stress distribution and stress concentration around an arbitrary-shaped inclusion. This is important because the model’s capacity to handle large datasets, consider variations in size and shape, and accurately replicate stress fields makes it a valuable tool for studying how inclusion characteristics affect material performance. An automatized dataset generation method using finite element simulation is proposed, validated, and used for attaining a dataset with one thousand inclusion shapes motivated by experimental observations and their corresponding spatially-varying stress distributions. A U-Net-based convolutional neural network (CNN) is trained using the dataset, and its performance is evaluated through quantitative and qualitative comparisons. The dataset, consisting of these stress data arrays, is directly fed into the CNN model for training and evaluation. This approach bypasses the need for converting the stress data into image format, allowing for a more direct and efficient input representation for the CNN. The model was evaluated through a series of sensitivity analyses, focusing on the impact of dataset size and model resolution on accuracy and performance. The results demonstrated that increasing the dataset size significantly improved the model’s prediction accuracy, as indicated by the correlation values. Additionally, the investigation into the effect of model resolution revealed that higher resolutions led to better stress field predictions and reduced error. Overall, the surrogate model proved effective in accurately predicting the effective stress concentration in inclusions, showcasing its potential in practical applications requiring stress analysis such as structural engineering, material design, failure analysis, and multi-scale modeling.


18 January 2023 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMohammad Rezasefat
Mohammad Rezasefat
ABalessio beligni
alessio beligni
Claudio SbarufattiClaudio Sbarufatti
Claudio Sbarufatti
SASandro Campos Amico
Sandro Campos Amico
Andrea ManesAndrea Manes
Andrea Manes
This paper presents an experimental and numerical investigation on the influence of pre-existing impact damage on the low-velocity impact response of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP). A continuum damage mechanics-based material model was developed by defining a user-defined material model in Abaqus/Explicit. The model employed the action plane strength of Puck for the damage initiation criterion together with a strain-based progressive damage model. Initial finite element simulations at the single-element level demonstrated the validity and capability of the damage model. More complex models were used to simulate tensile specimens, coupon specimens, and skin panels subjected to low-velocity impacts, being validated against experimental data at each stage. The effect of non-central impact location showed higher impact peak forces and bigger damage areas for impacts closer to panel boundaries. The presence of pre-existing damage close to the impact region leading to interfering delamination areas produced severe changes in the mechanical response, lowering the impact resistance on the panel for the second impact, while for non-interfering impacts, the results of the second impact were similar to the impact of a pristine specimen.