Xiao Zhang

Dr. Xiao Zhang

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 March 2024 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TJTao Jin
Tao Jin
XZXiao Zhang
Xiao Zhang
TWTingting Wang
Tingting Wang
JLJichao Liang
Jichao Liang
WMWei Ma
Wei Ma
JXJiancang Xie
Jiancang Xie

30 August 2023 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TJTao Jin
Tao Jin
XZXiao Zhang
Xiao Zhang
JXJiancang Xie
Jiancang Xie
JLJichao Liang
Jichao Liang
TWTingting Wang
Tingting Wang

18 December 2024 in Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WMWei Ma
Wei Ma
XZXiao Zhang
Xiao Zhang
JXJiancang xie
Jiancang xie
GZGanggang Zuo
Ganggang Zuo
FLFeixiong Luo
Feixiong Luo
XYXue Yang
Xue Yang

29 October 2024 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WMWei Ma
Wei Ma
XZXiao Zhang
Xiao Zhang
YSYu Shen
Yu Shen
JXJiancang xie
Jiancang xie
GZGanggang Zuo
Ganggang Zuo
TJTao Jin
Tao Jin
Monthly runoff prediction is crucial for water resource allocation and flood prevention. Many existing methods use identical deep learning networks to understand monthly runoff patterns, neglecting the importance of predictor selection. To enhance predictive accuracy and reliability, this study proposes an RFECV–SSA–LSTM forecasting approach. It iteratively eliminates predictors derived from SSA decomposition and PACF using recursive feature elimination and cross-validation (RFECV) to identify the most relevant subset for predicting the target flow. LSTM modeling is then used to forecast flows 1–7 months into the future. Furthermore, the RFECV–SSA framework complements any machine-learning-based runoff prediction method. To demonstrate the method’s reliability and effectiveness, its outputs are compared across three scenarios: direct LSTM, MIR–LSTM, and RFECV–LSTM, using monthly runoff historical data from Yangxian and Hanzhong hydrological stations in the Hanjiang River Basin, China. The results show that the RFECV–LSTM method is more robust and efficient than the direct LSTM and MIR–LSTM counterparts, with the smallest number of outliers for NSE, NRMSE, and PPTS under all forecasting scenarios. The MIR–LSTM approach exhibits the worst performance, indicating that single-metric-based feature selection may eliminate valuable information. The SSA time–frequency decomposition is superior, with NSE values remaining stably around 0.95 under all scenarios. The NSE value of the RFECV–SSA–LSTM method is greater than 0.95 under almost all forecasting scenarios, outperforming other benchmark models. Therefore, the RFECV–SSA–LSTM method is effective for forecasting highly nonlinear runoff series, exhibiting high accuracy and generalization ability.

15 November 2022 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XYXinyu Yang
Xinyu Yang
XZXiao Zhang
Xiao Zhang
JXJiancang xie
Jiancang xie
XZXu Zhang
Xu Zhang
SLShihui Liu
Shihui Liu
High-precision monthly runoff prediction results are of great significance to regional water resource management. However, with the changes in human activity, climate, and underlying surface conditions, the runoff sequence presents highly nonlinear and random characteristics. In order to improve the accuracy of runoff prediction, this study proposed a runoff prediction model based on fuzzy information granulation (FIG) and back propagation neural network (BPNN) improved with genetic algorithm (FIG-GA-BP). First, FIG was used to process the original runoff data to generate three sequences of minimum, average, and maximum that can reflect the rule of runoff changes. Then, genetic algorithms (GA) were used to obtain the optimal initial weights and thresholds of the BPNN through selection, crossover, and mutation. Finally, BPNN was used to predict the generated three sequences separately to obtain the prediction interval. The proposed model was applied to the monthly runoff interval prediction of Linjiacun and Weijiabu hydrological stations in the main stream of the Wei River and Zhangjiashan hydrological station on Jing River, a tributary of the Wei River. Compared with the interval prediction model FIG-BP, FIG-WNN, and traditional BP model. The results show that the FIG-GA-BP interval prediction model had a good prediction effect, with higher prediction accuracy and a narrower range of prediction intervals. Therefore, this model has superiority and practicability in monthly runoff interval prediction.