Tao Jin

Dr. Tao Jin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 April 2022 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jichao LiangJichao Liang
Jichao Liang
JXJiancang Xie
Jiancang Xie
XWXue Wang
Xue Wang
RWRui Wang
Rui Wang
TJTao Jin
Tao Jin
SWShaojiu Wang
Shaojiu Wang
Water pollution is an important aspect of a national water treatment. Sudden water safety incidents are random and destructive, often bringing about huge losses of life and property. Due to the uncertainty of sudden water pollution, it is difficult to respond in a timely and rapid manner. Emergency personnel must deal with emergencies quickly and effectively to reduce the harm caused by these emergencies. The randomness and uncertainty of sudden water pollution events make emergency work more complicated; it is difficult for current emergency plans to play guiding roles in complex responses. The decision-making and use of traditional water safety procedures largely depend on the experiences of command personnel, as well as on the emergency plan, which often has poor applicability. This can result in ineffective implementation of emergency actions and use of resources stemming from the high subjectivity and low efficiency of emergency plans. In this paper, we summarize previous research on digital planning and platform component technology exploration in order to evaluate the use of sudden water safety emergency procedures. We first analyze the main problems in the construction and use of emergency plans (e.g., the lack of experience and adaptability). Secondly, based on the decision-making support platform, a digital emergency plan database for water pollution emergencies was established by using component technology and knowledge map technology. In doing so, the decision support platform could enable the rapid construction of digital plans that improve application efficiency in an actual response scenario. Finally, through the system example, this system model can be quickly matched from the plan database to the emergency plan that meets the current scenario. It is a recommended model used to provide rapid and effective assistance for emergency management and improve emergency efficiency.

18 December 2024 in Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WMWei Ma
Wei Ma
XZXiao Zhang
Xiao Zhang
JXJiancang xie
Jiancang xie
GZGanggang Zuo
Ganggang Zuo
FLFeixiong Luo
Feixiong Luo
XYXue Yang
Xue Yang

29 October 2024 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WMWei Ma
Wei Ma
XZXiao Zhang
Xiao Zhang
YSYu Shen
Yu Shen
JXJiancang xie
Jiancang xie
GZGanggang Zuo
Ganggang Zuo
TJTao Jin
Tao Jin
Monthly runoff prediction is crucial for water resource allocation and flood prevention. Many existing methods use identical deep learning networks to understand monthly runoff patterns, neglecting the importance of predictor selection. To enhance predictive accuracy and reliability, this study proposes an RFECV–SSA–LSTM forecasting approach. It iteratively eliminates predictors derived from SSA decomposition and PACF using recursive feature elimination and cross-validation (RFECV) to identify the most relevant subset for predicting the target flow. LSTM modeling is then used to forecast flows 1–7 months into the future. Furthermore, the RFECV–SSA framework complements any machine-learning-based runoff prediction method. To demonstrate the method’s reliability and effectiveness, its outputs are compared across three scenarios: direct LSTM, MIR–LSTM, and RFECV–LSTM, using monthly runoff historical data from Yangxian and Hanzhong hydrological stations in the Hanjiang River Basin, China. The results show that the RFECV–LSTM method is more robust and efficient than the direct LSTM and MIR–LSTM counterparts, with the smallest number of outliers for NSE, NRMSE, and PPTS under all forecasting scenarios. The MIR–LSTM approach exhibits the worst performance, indicating that single-metric-based feature selection may eliminate valuable information. The SSA time–frequency decomposition is superior, with NSE values remaining stably around 0.95 under all scenarios. The NSE value of the RFECV–SSA–LSTM method is greater than 0.95 under almost all forecasting scenarios, outperforming other benchmark models. Therefore, the RFECV–SSA–LSTM method is effective for forecasting highly nonlinear runoff series, exhibiting high accuracy and generalization ability.

28 November 2022 in Acta Geophysica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XCXiaowan Chen
Xiaowan Chen
Jichao LiangJichao Liang
Jichao Liang
XHXinxin He
Xinxin He
DLDandan Liu
Dandan Liu
JLJin-bao Liu
Jin-bao Liu
JXJiancang xie
Jiancang xie