In the track quality analysis, numerical values representing the relative condition of track geometry called track quality indices (TQIs) are calculated along a specific track segment. Segments are defined as linear track geometry datasets with the homogeneous characteristics of factors affecting geometry degradation. The 200m-long analytical segment is used most often on inter-city conventional and high-speed rail networks. However, in the case of the small urban rail networks, the homogeneity of track-geometry degradation influential factors is very low. This segment length is usually too long for efficient track maintenance or reconstruction with minimal disruption of the urban traffic. This paper explores the effect of reducing the analytical segment length in the condition assessment of the tram network in the City of Osijek, Croatia. The research had two main objectives: (1) to assess the narrow-gauge tram-track geometry quality through the application of the established synthesized TQIs, and (2) to analyze how a change in the analytical segment length affects this assessment. Two synthesized track quality indices—one based on a weighted value and the other on a standard deviation of measured track geometry parameters—were calculated for the 27.5 km of tracks on consecutive 200-, 100-, 50-, and 25 m long analytical segments. The comparative analysis of the TQIs’ calculation results showed that the reduction in the segment length increased the resolution of the track quality analysis in both cases, while the index based on a weighted value of geometry deviations proved less sensitive to this reduction. These results contribute to further segmentation process establishment and TQIs implementation on tram infrastructure.
Several types of modern roundabouts are alternatives to standard ones. They are either in use or at the development stage today. One such intersection is the two-geometry roundabout. Its circulatory roadway has an elliptical outer edge and a circular inner edge that is defined by a circular central island resulting in variable circulatory roadway width. The investigation presented in this paper aims to determine the influence of this variable width on the design of other geometric elements and its impact on roundabouts’ speed reduction capabilities. There is not enough experimental data collected to make a comparison to other roundabout types, so this investigation is based on computer simulations and speed estimations. The investigation is conducted on 40 four-legged single-lane roundabout schemes. These were designed in the Autodesk AutoCAD 2021 software through computer simulations of vehicle movement and the resulting swept paths of a tractor with a semi-trailer generated by the Autodesk Vehicle Tracking 2020 software. The results show that truck aprons must be included in the design of two-geometry roundabouts with a major axis between 18 and 25 m to achieve appropriate circulatory roadway widths, personal car path deflection, and the resulting relative speed and speed consistency.
The prediction of stop dwell time is a major issue in travel speed modeling, i.e., in the definition of travel time for high-frequency and high-ridership rail public transport. This is due to the numerous influential factors associated with stop dwell time, variable both in space and time, such as passenger flow, vehicle and stop design characteristics, and traffic organization. To investigate the impact of the heterogeneity of tram vehicles on stop dwell time, a survey was conducted regarding the tram network of the City of Zagreb. The dwell time at three consecutive island stops served by three different tram vehicle types was analyzed. The stops are located near the city center, in a separate tram corridor, at the far side of signalized intersections. Dwell time was determined and evaluated through the statistical analysis of observed, measured, and video-recorded data. The results show that at stops with up to 200 passengers per hour, the dwell time is around 15 s. For volumes of 20 passengers or less per tram, the dwell time is mostly affected by the tram door opening mechanism and opening/closing time. As the passenger volumes become higher, the number of doors per vehicle becomes more significant.
This paper aims to contribute to the process of evaluating urban rail infrastructure projects through the presentation of the methodology and the results of a preliminary feasibility study concerning the revitalization, development, and (re)integration of the rail with road, maritime, and air transportation in the Zadar urban area. The analysis included the identification and evaluation of rail infrastructure alignment variants that would ensure the revitalization of the existing railway infrastructure, relocation of freight rail traffic from the narrow and densely developed suburban coastal area, promotion of intermodal passenger and freight transportation, improvement of urban and regional accessibility and connectivity, increase of traffic safety, reduction of travel time and operating costs, and decrease of traffic impacts on the environment. By consulting legal frameworks, spatial planning documentation, and analyzing the socio-economic context and existing transportation infrastructure function, six variants for the (re)development of the rail infrastructure were designed. As their design approached the area’s transportation issues from different angles and could contribute differently to the area’s economic, social, and territorial issues, a multi-criteria analysis supplemented with a partial cost–benefit analysis was conducted to select the most suitable variant. The evaluation was based on seven weighted criteria quantified by the normalization of 32 indicator values, scored from 1 to 5, where a score of 5 was considered the highest. Weighting the scores according to the ratios determined through a consultation process with stakeholders resulted in ranking the best variant with a total score of 3.7 and the worst one with a total score of 2.6. To avoid potential objections that the set of criteria weights used was subjective and the result biased, a sensitivity analysis was carried out by systematically varying the weights among criteria. The results showed that the best-ranked variant was also the least sensitive to applied weight shifts, with a score range of 0.2.