Caitriona Cahir

Dr. Caitriona Cahir

Epidemiology & Modelling Research Group (EMeRGe), Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Mercer Street, Dublin D02 YN77, Ireland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 April 2010 in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCCaitriona Cahir
Caitriona Cahir
TFTom Fahey
Tom Fahey
MTMary Teeling
Mary Teeling
CTConor Teljeur
Conor Teljeur
JFJohn Feely
John Feely
KBKathleen Bennett
Kathleen Bennett
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) refers to medications that should generally be avoided in older populations and doses or frequencies of administrations that should not be exceeded. Studies of PIP have been primarily based on US indicators of appropriateness such as the Beers criteria due to the lack of European specific indicators.• PIP has not been assessed in full national samples.• The total cost of PIP drugs and the cost in relation to overall national pharmaceutical expenditure have not been described. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • One third of the Irish population aged ≥70 years were prescribed at least one potentially inappropriate medication in 2007 based on European criteria.• There was a signficant association between polypharmacy and the risk of PIP. Polypharmacy was evaluated as the number of different repeat drug classes (≥ three prescription claims) per claimant.• The most prevalent PIP drugs were: proton pump inhibitors at maximum therapeutic dosage for >8 weeks (40 mg daily omeprazole, pantoprazole and esomeprazole, 30 mg daily lansoprazole and 20 mg daily rabeprazole); non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatories for >3 months; long‐acting benzodiazepines for >1 month and drug duplication within the same therapeutic class.• The total expenditure on potentially inappropriate drugs was €45 631 319 in 2007 which is 9% of the overall expenditure on pharmaceuticals in those aged ≥70 years in Ireland.AIMS Optimization of drug prescribing in older populations is a priority due to the significant clinical and economic costs of drug‐related illness. This study aimed to: (i) estimate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in a national Irish older population using European specific explicit prescribing criteria; (ii) investigate the association between PIP, number of drug classes, gender and age and; (iii) establish the total cost of PIP.METHODS This was a retrospective national population study (n= 338 801) using the Health Service Executive Primary Care Reimbursement Service (HSE‐PCRS) pharmacy claims database. The HSE‐PCRS uses the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system and details of every drug dispensed and claimants' demographic data are available. Thirty PIP indicators (STOPP) were applied to prescription claims for those ≥70 years in Ireland in 2007. STOPP is a physiological system based screening tool of older persons' potentially inappropriate prescriptions assessing drug–drug and drug–disease interactions, dose and duration.RESULTS In our study population PIP prevalence was 36% (121 454 claimants). The main contributors to this were: 56 560 (17%) prescribed proton pump inhibitors at maximum therapeutic dose for >8 weeks, 29 691 (9%) prescribed non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatories for >3 months, 17 676 (5%) prescribed long‐acting benzodiazepines for >1 month and 16 201 (5%) prescribed duplicate drugs. The main determinant of PIP was polypharmacy. The likelihood of PIP increased with a significant linear and quadratic trend (P < 0.0001) with the number of drug classes.The maximum net ingredient cost of PIP was estimated to be €38 664 640. Total PIP expenditure was estimated to be €45 631 319, 9% of the overall expenditure on pharmaceuticals in those ≥70 years in 2007.CONCLUSIONS The findings identify a high prevalence of PIP in Ireland with significant cost consequences.

4 September 2019 in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CWCaroline A. Walsh
Caroline A. Walsh
CCCaitriona Cahir
Caitriona Cahir
STSarah Tecklenborg
Sarah Tecklenborg
CBCatherine Byrne
Catherine Byrne
MCMichael A. Culbertson
Michael A. Culbertson
KBKathleen Bennett
Kathleen Bennett
Aims: The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to synthesise the evidence relating to medication non‐adherence and its association with health outcomes in people aged ≥50 years.Methods: Seven databases were searched up to February 2019 for observational studies that measured medication (non‐)adherence as a predictor of the following health outcomes in adults aged ≥50 years: healthcare utilisation (hospitalisation, emergency department visits, outpatient visits and general practitioner visits), mortality, adverse clinical events and quality of life. Screening and quality assessment using validated criteria were completed by 2 reviewers independently. Random effects models were used to generate pooled estimates of association using adjusted study results. The full methodological approach was published on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42017077264).Results: Sixty‐six studies were identified for qualitative synthesis, with 11 of these studies eligible for meta‐analyses. A meta‐analysis including 3 studies measuring medication non‐adherence in adults aged ≥55 years showed a significant association with all‐cause hospitalisation (adjusted odds ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12, 1.21). A meta‐analysis including 2 studies showed that medication non‐adherence was not significantly associated with an emergency department visit (adjusted odds ratio 1.05, 95% CI 0.90, 1.22). Good adherence was associated with a 21% reduction in long‐term mortality risk in comparison to medication non‐adherence (adjusted hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.63, 0.98).Conclusion: Medication non‐adherence may be significantly associated with all‐cause hospitalisation and mortality in older people. Medication adherence should be monitored and addressed in this cohort to minimise hospitalisation, improve clinical outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

20 December 2013 in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CCCaitriona Cahir
Caitriona Cahir
KBKathleen Bennett
Kathleen Bennett
CTConor Teljeur
Conor Teljeur
TFTom Fahey
Tom Fahey

25 March 2012 in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMarie C. Bradley
Marie C. Bradley
TFTom Fahey
Tom Fahey
CCCaitriona Cahir
Caitriona Cahir
KBKathleen Bennett
Kathleen Bennett
DODermot O’rEilly
Dermot O’rEilly
CHCarmel M. Hughes
Carmel M. Hughes

3 January 2020 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMEnrica Menditto
Enrica Menditto
VOValentina Orlando
Valentina Orlando
Giuseppe De RosaGiuseppe De Rosa
Giuseppe De Rosa
PMPaola Minghetti
Paola Minghetti
UMUmberto Musazzi
Umberto Musazzi
Isabel AlmeidaIsabel Almeida
Isabel Almeida
Medication adherence is a growing concern for public health and poor adherence to therapy has been associated with poor health outcomes and higher costs for patients. Interventions for improving adherence need to consider the characteristics of the individual therapeutic regimens according to the needs of the patients. In particular, geriatric and paediatric populations as well as dermatological patients have special needs/preferences that should be considered when designing drug products. Patient Centric Drug Product Pharmaceutical Design (PCDPD) offers the opportunity to meet the needs and preferences of patients. Packaging, orodispersible formulations, fixed dose combinations products, multiparticulate formulations, topical formulations and 3D printing are of particular relevance in a PCDPD process. These will be addressed in this review as well as their impact on medication adherence.

12 June 2014 in BMC Geriatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMarie C Bradley
Marie C Bradley
NMNicola Motterlini
Nicola Motterlini
SPShivani Padmanabhan
Shivani Padmanabhan
CCCaitriona Cahir
Caitriona Cahir
TWTim Williams
Tim Williams
CHCarmel M Hughes
Carmel M Hughes
Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in older people is associated with increases in morbidity, hospitalisation and mortality. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of and factors associated with PIP, among those aged ≥70 years, in the United Kingdom, using a comprehensive set of prescribing indicators and comparing these to estimates obtained from a truncated set of the same indicators.