Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) is a new advanced imaging technique that is going to transform the standard clinical use of computed tomography (CT) imaging. Photon-counting detectors resolve the number of photons and the incident X-ray energy spectrum into multiple energy bins. Compared with conventional CT technology, PCCT offers the advantages of improved spatial and contrast resolution, reduction of image noise and artifacts, reduced radiation exposure, and multi-energy/multi-parametric imaging based on the atomic properties of tissues, with the consequent possibility to use different contrast agents and improve quantitative imaging. This narrative review first briefly describes the technical principles and the benefits of photon-counting CT and then provides a synthetic outline of the current literature on its use for vascular imaging.

The photon-counting detector (PCD) is a new computed tomography detector technology (photon-counting computed tomography, PCCT) that provides substantial benefits for cardiac and coronary artery imaging. Compared with conventional CT, PCCT has multi-energy capability, increased spatial resolution and soft tissue contrast with near-null electronic noise, reduced radiation exposure, and optimization of the use of contrast agents. This new technology promises to overcome several limitations of traditional cardiac and coronary CT angiography (CCT/CCTA) including reduction in blooming artifacts in heavy calcified coronary plaques or beam-hardening artifacts in patients with coronary stents, and a more precise assessment of the degree of stenosis and plaque characteristic thanks to its better spatial resolution. Another potential application of PCCT is the use of a double-contrast agent to characterize myocardial tissue. In this current overview of the existing PCCT literature, we describe the strengths, limitations, recent applications, and promising developments of employing PCCT technology in CCT.

Objective—: Circulating levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are predictors of prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed at evaluating the effect of coronary atherosclerosis and myocardial ischemia on cardiac release of hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP in patients with suspected CAD. Approach and Results—: Hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP were measured in 378 patients (60.1±0.5 years, 229 males) with stable angina and unknown CAD enrolled in the Evaluation of Integrated Cardiac Imaging (EVINCI) study. All patients underwent stress imaging to detect myocardial ischemia and coronary computed tomographic angiography to assess the presence and characteristics of CAD. An individual computed tomographic angiography score was calculated combining extent, severity, composition, and location of plaques. In the whole population, the median (25–75 percentiles) value of plasma hs-cTnT was 6.17 (4.2–9.1) ng/L and of NT-proBNP was 61.66 (31.2–132.6) ng/L. In a multivariate model, computed tomographic angiography score was an independent predictor of the plasma hs-cTnT (coefficient 0.06, SE 0.02; P =0.0089), whereas ischemia was a predictor of NT-proBNP (coefficient 0.38, SE 0.12; P =0.0015). Hs-cTnT concentrations were significantly increased in patients with CAD with or without myocardial ischemia ( P <0.005), whereas only patients with CAD and ischemia showed significantly higher levels of NT-proBNP ( P <0.001). Conclusions—: In patients with stable angina, the presence and extent of coronary atherosclerosis is related with circulating levels of hs-cTnT, also in the absence of ischemia, suggesting an ischemia-independent mechanism of hs-cTnT release. Obstructive CAD causing myocardial ischemia is associated with increased levels of NT-proBNP.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) emerged as a valid alternative in patients with a formal contraindication to oral anticoagulant therapy. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE), cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA), intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), and conventional cardiac angiography (CCA) are used to evaluate LAA diameters. The aim of our study was to compare pre- and intraprocedural imaging techniques in determining the correct selection of the device size, with a retrospective evaluation of the results obtained at post-procedural CCTA follow-up. Between September 2009 and July 2013, 66 consecutive patients underwent to LAAO with the ACP at our institution. Preoperative LAA evaluation was realized with TEE, CCTA, ICE, and CCA. Fifty-eight (58) patients underwent to post-procedural CCTA to confirm the LAA complete exclusion, the number and extent of the residual leaks, and the positioning of the device. LAA diameters measured by CCTA correlate with the diameters obtained with CCA and ICE, but they are sized slightly larger than the others. TEE has a lower correlation with every other imaging method and a likely tendency to underestimate. The distribution of the leaks and the positioning of the device in post-procedural CCTA show no substantial differences between the devices used greater or equal to the one selected with CCTA in terms of LAA exclusion. The sizing of the device decided using CCTA in the phase of maximum LAA expansion reduces the risk of high-flow leaks and device malposition due to undersizing.