Objective: COVID-19 can result in a broad spectrum of dysfunctions, some of which may persist for lo...

Zusammenfassung: Hintergrund Das Beschwerdebild der Folgeerscheinungen, die nach einer COVID-19-Erkrankung auch nach Monaten existieren können, wird immer deutlicher: das Post-COVID-Syndrom. Neben verschiedenen Symptomen können auch funktionellen Zusammenhänge bestehen, die die Arbeitsfähigkeit einschränken. Derzeitige Untersuchungen gehen von 10% der Infizierten aus, die dies betrifft. In Deutschland würde dies nach aktuellen Zahlen 380 000 Menschen betreffen. Das Ziel dieser Analyse war es zu zeigen, wie sich die reale und gefühlte Arbeitsfähigkeit bei Patient*innen mit Post-COVID Syndrom darstellt. Methode Der Rehabilitation Needs Questionnaire wird routinemäßig bei Patient*innen mit Post-COVID-Symptomatik bei Vorstellungen in der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover bzw. dem Universitätsklinikum Jena ausgefüllt. Es erfolgte eine deskriptive Analyse der Fragebögen ab April 2021 unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Arbeitsfähigkeit. Ausgeschlossen wurden Patient*innen, die nicht im arbeitsfähigen Alter waren, oder bereits vor der COVID-19-Infektion arbeitsunfähig. Ergebnisse 75 von 81 Fragebögen wurden im entsprechenden Zeitraum von einer Stichprobe im arbeitsfähigen Alter in die Auswertung mit einbezogen (68% von Frauen, 32% von Männern). Das Durchschnittsalter lag bei 42,5 Jahren, die Zeit seit der Infektion im Mittel bei 3 Monaten. 44 der 75 Personen (58,7%) waren zum Zeitpunkt der Befragung arbeitsfähig. Die empfundene Arbeitsfähigkeit wurde im Schnitt mit 5,1 von 10 möglichen Punkten angegeben. Frauen zeigten hier durchschnittlich 6,2 Punkte und Männer 4,7 Punkte. 59,1% (n=26) der Befragten gaben Schwierigkeiten beim Erhalt von notwendigen Therapien an. 31 (41,3%) Personen waren zum Zeitpunkt der Befragung aufgrund der POST-COVID-19-Erkrankung arbeitsunfähig. Das mittlere Alter der Gruppe lag bei 46,6 Jahren. 16 (51,6%) der 31 Proband*innen gaben an ununterbrochen seit der Infektion arbeitsunfähig zu sein. Schwierigkeiten beim Erhalt von notwendigen Therapien hatten in dieser Gruppe 64,5% (n=20). Diskussion Die Rate derer, die nach einer COVID-19-Erkrankung auch nach Monaten noch arbeitsunfähig sind, ist hoch. Notwendige therapeutische Maßnahmen stehen entweder in nicht genügender Anzahl zur Verfügung oder werden trotz entsprechender Indikation nicht ausreichend verordnet. Weitere Untersuchungen sind notwendig, um die Wirksamkeit von Therapien zu belegen und welche Barrieren zur Rückkehr an den Arbeitsplatz bestehen. Die Auswirkungen können bei weiter steigenden Fallzahlen noch über Jahre hinweg Einfluss auf die Wirtschaftskraft des Landes haben.

Physiotherapy is mentioned as an adjunctive treatment to improve the symptoms of cervical dystonia in terms of pain, function and quality of life. However, botulinum neurotoxin injection remains the treatment of choice. This systematic review emphasizes physical therapy and evaluates it by including six studies. The methodology is based on a previous systematic review on this topic to provide better comparability and actuality. For this purpose, two databases were searched using the previously published keywords. This time, only randomised controlled trials were evaluated to increase the power. In conclusion, additional physical therapy and active home exercise programs appear to be useful. Further research should focus on the dose–response principle to emphasize physical therapy treatment modalities.

Objective The aim of the study was the evaluation of the effects of a single manual medicine treatment (SMMT) for infants with postural and motor asymmetries in upper cervical asymmetry disorder respectively kinematic imbalance due to suboccipital strain (KISS). Methods Design: Multicentre double-blind randomised study Subjects/Setting: 202 infants at the age of 14–24 weeks with postural and movement findings were examined in four study centres using the standardized 4-item Symmetry-Score (points: 4=symmetric to 17=asymmetric). The inclusion criterion was a score of at least 10 points. The intervention group (IG) received a SMMT, whereas the control group (CG) did not receive any manual therapy. In addition, the infants of both groups were trained with a home exercise programme by their parents. Statistical Methods The primary target parameter was the result of the Symmetry-Score, measured before the intervention and 4–6 weeks afterwards. Results 171 children were randomised (IG=83/CG=88). All infants enrolled were measured to the second time-point (Intention-to-treat-analysis). The average improvement of IG compared to CG in Symmetry-Score was 2.3 points (p<.001). Following the score definition 80% of IG and 49% of CG fell below the treatment threshold of 10 points. No side effects were observed. Conclusions The SMMT significantly improves postural and motor asymmetries in infants with KISS.

Background: There are different therapeutic approaches to persistent positional preference (kinematic imbalance due to suboccipital strain, KISS) in infants. There are no evidence-based or controlled studies investigating the effect of manual medicine treatment in children aged 3–6 months, particularly in combination with a home exercise programme. The presented monocentric study on one-time manual medicine treatment of infants aged 14–24 exhibiting these symptoms aims to close this gap.Methods: This study comprises a controlled double-blind trial and per-protocol-analysis. Primary outcome was the 4-item symmetry score (4–17 points). The second measurement was performed after 4–6 weeks.Results: A total of 62 infants were treated and evaluated (mean age 17 weeks). The intervention and control groups started with a symmetry score of 12.9 ± 2.1 and 12.5 ± 1.7 points, respectively. In the intervention group the score improved by 4.9 ± 2.4 to 8.0 ± 2.7 points, in the control group it improved by 2.9 ± 2.9 to 9.6 ± 3.0 points. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p = 0.03). Both groups had significantly better values over time (p < 0.001). No adverse events or side effects were observed.Conclusion: Manual medicine treatment of infants with postural and movement asymmetries as well as positional preference in combination with a home exercise programme is superior to a home exercise programme alone. Both treatment concepts achieved significant improvements. However, the manual medicine treatment played an important role in reducing the symmetry score value for the affected children, such they were no longer in need of treatment.

A relevant proportion of patients suffer from long-lasting impairments following an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. The proposed post-COVID syndrome (PCS) score may improve comparison in the course and classification of affected patients. A prospective cohort of 952 patients presenting to the post-COVID outpatient clinic at Jena University Hospital, Germany, was enrolled. Patients received a structured examination. PCS score was calculated per visit. A total of 378 (39.7%) and 129 (13.6%) patients of the entire population visited the outpatient clinic two or three times, respectively (female: 66.4%; age: 49.5 (SD = 13) years). The initial presentation took place, on average, 290 (SD = 138) days after acute infection. The most frequently reported symptoms were fatigue (80.4%) and neurological impairments (76.1%). The mean PCS scores of patients with three visits were 24.6 points (SD = 10.9), 23.0 points (SD = 10.9) and 23.5 points (SD = 11.5) (p = 0.407), indicating moderate PCS. Female sex (p < 0.001), preexisting coagulation disorder (p = 0.021) and coronary artery disease (p = 0.032) were associated with higher PCS scores. PCS is associated with a multitude of long-lasting problems. The PCS score has proven its capability to objectify and quantify PCS symptoms in an outpatient setting. The influence of therapeutic measures on various PCS aspects should be the subject of further analyses.