Response surface methodology (RSM) approach was used for optimization of the process parameters and identifying the optimal conditions for the removal of both trihalomethanes (THMs) and natural organic matter (NOM) in drinking water supplies. Co-precipitation process was employed for the synthesis of magnetic nano-adsorbent (sMNP), and were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM), trans-emission electron microscopy (TEM), BET (Brunauer-Emmett-Teller), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) and zeta potential. Box-Behnken experimental design combined with response surface and optimization was used to predict THM and NOM in drinking water supplies. Variables were concentration of sMNP (0.1 g to 5 g), pH (4–10) and reaction time (5 min to 90 min). Statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out to identify the adequacy of the developed model, and revealed good agreement between the experimental data and proposed model. The experimentally derived RSM model was validated using t-test and a range of statistical parameters. The observed R² value, adj. R², pred. R² and “F-values” indicates that the developed THM and NOM models are significant. Risk analysis study revealed that under the RSM optimized conditions, a marked reduction in the cancer risk of THMs was observed for both the groups studied. Therefore, the study observed that the developed process and models can be efficiently applied for the removal of both THM and NOM from drinking water supplies.

Sukinda is one of the most polluted regions of the globe due to chromium pollution. The study sheds light into the heavy metal pollution around the mining area and its effect on the health of the resident populace. The Cr(VI) was in the range of 0.027–2.48 mg/L in surface water and BDL–1.35 mg/L in the groundwater. Multivariate analysis revealed that mining activity was the main source of TCr, Cr(VI), and Zn in the surface water that warrants attention. Heavy metal evaluation index showed high levels of Fe, Mn, and Cr in groundwater that can pose serious threat to the exposed population. Cancer and non-cancer risk of Cr(VI) was higher than other metals in groundwater. The results revealed that the total cancer risk was 1.21E-03 and 1.05E-03 in adults and children, respectively, which exceeded the USEPA acceptable cancer health risk. High health risk was observed through oral intake of water, while both cancer and non-cancer risks were negligible through dermal contact. This study strongly advocates proper periodic assessment of drinking as well as surface water in the area and regulation to restrict the use of contaminated water for daily use.