Flood hazard assessment is a fundamental step in flood risk mapping. Quantitative assessment requires hydrodynamic modelling of the flooding process in order to calculate the spatial distribution of suitable flood hazard indicators representative of flooding intensity and frequency, hence its potential to result in harm. Flood hazard indicators are usually defined by combining relevant flooding parameters, mainly flood depth and flow velocity, but also flooding arrival time, flooding duration, sediment or contamination load, and so forth. A flood hazard classification is commonly introduced to assign a hazard level to areas potentially subject to flooding. This article presents a systematic review of quantitative methods proposed in the scientific literature or prescribed by government authorities to assess the hazard associated with natural or anthropic flooding. Flood hazard classification methods are listed and compared by specifying their underlying approach (heuristic, conceptual, empirical), the exposed element which they were designed for (people, buildings, vehicles, etc.), and their fields of application (river overflow, dam‐break, levee breach, debris flow). Perspectives and future challenges in quantitative flood hazard analysis are also discussed. This review aims to help modellers and practitioners to select the most suitable flood hazard assessment method for the case study of interest.

Dam break inundation mapping is essential for risk management and mitigation, emergency action planning, and potential consequences assessment. To quantify flood hazard associated with dam failures, flooding variables must be predicted by efficient and robust numerical models capable to effectively cope with the computational difficulties posed by complex flows on real topographies. Validation against real-field data of historical dam-breaks is extremely useful to verify models’ capabilities and accuracy. However, such catastrophic events are rather infrequent, and available data on the breaching mechanism and downstream flooding are usually inaccurate and incomplete. Nevertheless, in some cases, real-field data collected after the event (mainly breach size, maximum water depths and flood wave arrival times at selected locations, water marks, and extent of flooded areas) are adequate to set up valuable and significant test cases, provided that all other data required to perform numerical simulations are available (mainly topographic data of the floodable area and input parameters defining the dam-break scenario). This paper provides a review of the historical dam-break events for which real-field datasets useful for validation purposes can be retrieved in the literature. The resulting real-field test cases are divided into well-documented test cases, for which extensive and complete data are already available, and cases with partial or inaccurate datasets. Type and quality of the available data are specified for each case. Finally, validation data provided by dam-break studies on physical models reproducing real topographies are presented and discussed. This review aims at helping dam-break modelers: (a) to select the most suitable real-field test cases for validating their numerical models, (b) to facilitate data access by indicating relevant bibliographic references, and (c) to identify test cases of potential interest worthy of further research.

Flood modeling by numerical solution of the two-dimensional (2D) shallow-water equations is ordinary practice. HEC-RAS 2D was recently released along with a suite of test cases showing the very good performance of the code in many practical situations. However, validation test cases aimed at demonstrating the capability of the software to deal with dam-break floods on very steep and irregular bathymetries are very limited. This paper tests HEC-RAS 2D against the discharge hydrographs measured in a historical physical model built in Froude similitude to analyze the consequences of the hypothetical collapse of the Cancano I dam (northern Italy) and the propagation of the resulting dam-break wave along the 15-km reach of the downstream alpine valley. The experimental hydrographs and the measured extent of the flooded areas are well reproduced by the numerical simulations. Moreover, the results obtained with HEC-RAS 2D are in very good agreement with those obtained using TELEMAC 2D, which confirms the suitability of the HEC-RAS 2D software for dam-break flood studies in steep alpine valleys. The data of the test case are made available to the scientific community for validation purposes.

This paper presents experimental and two-dimensional (2D) numerical results of four tests concerning rapidly varying flows induced by the sudden removal of a sluice gate. For the acquisition of the experimental data, an imaging technique capable of providing spatially distributed information was adopted: a coloring agent was added to the water, the opalescent bottom of the facility was backlighted, and photographs of the area of interest were taken. The gray tones of the acquired images were converted into water depths by means of transfer functions derived from a static calibration. The potential sources of error of the proposed procedure are discussed. A local comparison with an ultrasonic device showed a 20% maximum deviation in 95% of the observations. The tests were simulated through a 2D MUSCL-Hancock finite volume numerical model, based on the classical shallow water approximations, in which the intercell water depths are estimated according to the surface gradient method. A global analysis of the ...