The rock burst induced by the mutual disturbance of mining and excavation is significantly influenced by high static load stress and external dynamic load disturbance. In this paper, the evolution characteristics and progressive damage mechanism of surrounding rock in the process of mutual disturbance of mining and excavation are systematically studied. The results show that the evolution of surrounding rock stress can be roughly divided into three stages: rapid rise in the early stage, continuous rise and step-like decline in the middle stage, and slow rise in the late stage. In the process of parallel mining, the overlying rock movement above the goaf shows the sequence of horizontal penetration of tiny fissures—fracture intensification transition to stratification—non-coordinated caving of middle–low overlying rock—obvious horizontal cracks in the upper key layer. Only under the quasi-static loading mining action does the upper key layer not reach the breaking condition. The wave side of the heading face which is close to the focal point is affected by the dynamic load disturbance, the acceleration duration is short, and the attenuation is relatively fast, so it is the area prone to the earliest impact failure in the face of mining disturbance. The conclusion is helpful to deepen the understanding of the coal burst mechanism of mutual disturbance of mining and excavation.

The true triaxial test can accurately simulate the dynamic and static load superposition environment of deep mining and then reproduce the spatial and temporal evolution process of coal-rock dynamic disasters. This study used a self-developed true triaxial coal-rock dynamic behavior test system to investigate the dynamic failure characteristics and mechanism of coal bursts under different mining-induced stress disturbances. The results show that the perturbation duration of the coal samples under quasi-static load decreases with the increase of the disturbance rate, and the perturbation stress level increases first and then decreases. The coal samples can accumulate higher strain energy and show progressive and dynamic failure. The perturbation duration and stress peak of the coal sample under the cycle load decreased with the increase of the cycle amplitude and frequency, and the coal sample first spalled off on the free surface. The damage then developed internally until the coal burst. The perturbation duration and stress peak of coal samples decrease with the increase of transient stress and the perturbation stress levels. The dynamic failure process of coal samples is straightforward, and the strength of coal burst is violent and is more difficult to predict. The conclusions obtained help to deepen the understanding of the triggering mechanism of coal bursts.