Low antigen immunogenicity poses a significant challenge in vaccine development, often leading to inadequate immune responses and reduced vaccine efficacy. Therefore, the discovery of potent immune-enhancing adjuvants is crucial. STING (stimulator of interferon genes) agonists are a promising class of adjuvants which have been identified in various immune cells and are activated in response to DNA fragments, triggering a broad range of type-I interferon-dependent immune responses. Integrating STING agonists with vaccine components is an ideal strategy to bolster vaccine-induced immunity to infections and cancer cells. Several STING agonists are currently under investigation in preclinical studies and clinical trials; however, some have shown limited efficacy, while others exhibit off-target effects. To ensure safety, they are typically delivered with carriers that exhibit high biocompatibility and insolubility. In this review, we present the latest research on natural and synthetic STING agonists that have been effectively used in vaccine development, and summarize their application in adjuvant preventive and therapeutic vaccines. Additionally, we discuss the safety of STING agonists as vaccine adjuvants by reviewing potential delivery strategies. Overall, incorporating STING agonists into vaccine formulations represents a significant advancement in vaccine research with the potential to significantly enhance immune responses and improve vaccine efficacy. However, ongoing research is still required to identify the most effective and safe delivery strategies for STING agonists, as well as to evaluate their long-term safety and efficacy in clinical trials.

Since the emergence of COVID-19, extensive research efforts have been undertaken to accelerate the development of multiple types of vaccines to combat the pandemic. These include inactivated, recombinant subunit, viral vector, and nucleic acid vaccines. In the development of these diverse vaccines, appropriate methods to assess vaccine immunogenicity are essential in both preclinical and clinical studies. Among the biomarkers used in vaccine evaluation, the neutralizing antibody level serves as a pivotal indicator for assessing vaccine efficacy. Neutralizing antibody detection methods can mainly be classified into three types: the conventional virus neutralization test, pseudovirus neutralization test, and surrogate virus neutralization test. Importantly, standardization of these assays is critical for their application to yield results that are comparable across different laboratories. The development and use of international or regional standards would facilitate assay standardization and facilitate comparisons of the immune responses induced by different vaccines. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the principles, advantages, limitations, and application of different SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assays in vaccine clinical trials. This will provide guidance for the development and evaluation of COVID-19 vaccines.

From December 2022 to January 2023, SARS-CoV-2 infections caused by BA.5 and BF.7 subvariants of B.1.1.529 (Omicron) spread in China. It is urgently needed to evaluate the protective immune responses in the infected individuals against the current circulating variants to predict the future potential infection waves, such as the BQ.1.1, XBB.1.5, and CH1.1 variants. In this study, we constructed a panel of pseudotyped viruses for SARS-CoV-2 for the past and current circulating variants, including D614G, Delta, BA.1, BA.5, BF.7, BQ.1.1, XBB.1.5 and CH.1.1. We investigated the neutralization sensitivity of these pseudotyped viruses to sera from individuals who had BA.5 or BF.7 breakthrough infections in the infection wave of last December in China. The mean neutralization ID50 against infected variants BA.5 and BF.7 are 533 and 444, respectively. The highest neutralizing antibody level was observed when tested against the D614G strain, with the ID50 of 742, which is about 1.52-folds higher than that against the BA.5/BF.7 variant. The ID50 for BA.1, Delta and BQ.1.1 pseudotyped viruses were about 2-3 folds lower when compared to BA.5/BF.7. The neutralization activities of these serum samples against XBB.1.5 and CH.1.1 decreased 7.39-folds and 15.25-folds when compared to that against BA.5/BF.7. The immune escape capacity of these two variants might predict new infection waves in future when the neutralizing antibody levels decrease furtherly.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), remains widely pandemic around the world. Animal models that are sensitive to the virus are therefore urgently needed to evaluate potential vaccines and antiviral agents; however, SARS-CoV-2 requires biosafety level 3 containment. To overcome this, we developed an animal model using the intranasal administration of SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus. As the pseudovirus contains the firefly luciferase reporter gene, infected tissues and the viral load could be monitored by in vivo bioluminescent imaging. We used the model to evaluate the protective efficacy of monoclonal antibodies and the tissue tropism of different variants. The model may also be a useful tool for the safe and convenient preliminary evaluation of the protective efficacy of vaccine candidates against SARS-CoV-2, as well as the treatment efficacy of anti-viral drugs.

The global outbreak of COVID-19 has caused a severe threat to human health; therefore, simple, high-throughput neutralization assays are desirable for developing vaccines and drugs against COVID-19. In this study, a high-titre SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus was successfully packaged by truncating the C-terminus of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein by 21 amino acids and infecting 293 T cells that had been stably transfected with the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor and furin (named AF cells), to establish a simple, high-throughput, and automated 384-well plate neutralization assay. The method was optimized for cell amount, virus inoculation, incubation time, and detection time. The automated assay showed good sensitivity, accuracy, reproducibility, Z' factor, and a good correlation with the live virus neutralization assay. The high-throughput approach would make it available for the SARS-CoV-2 neutralization test in large-scale clinical trials and seroepidemiological surveys which would aid the accelerated vaccine development and evaluation.