Teng Wang

Prof. Teng Wang

School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 August 2015 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jean-Philippe AvouacJean-Philippe Avouac
Jean-Philippe Avouac
LMLingsen Meng
Lingsen Meng
SWShengji Wei
Shengji Wei
TWTeng Wang
Teng Wang
JAJean-Paul Ampuero
Jean-Paul Ampuero

8 August 2011 in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDaniele Perissin
Daniele Perissin
TWTeng Wang
Teng Wang
By means of the permanent scatterer (PS) technique, repeated spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images with relatively low resolution (about 25 m × 5 m for the European Remote Sensing (ERS) and Envisat satellites) can be used to estimate the displacement (1-mm precision) and 3-D location (1-m precision) of targets that show an unchanged electromagnetic signature. The main drawback of the PS technique is the limited spatial density of targets that behave coherently during the whole observation span (hundreds of PSs per square kilometer in urban site and up to few points in vegetated areas). In this paper, we describe a new approach for multitemporal analysis of SAR images that also allows extracting information from partially coherent targets. The basic idea is to loosen the restrictive conditions imposed by the PS technique. The results obtained in different test sites allowed to increase significantly the spatial coverage of the estimate of height and deformation trend, particularly in extraurban areas.

22 February 2023 in Seismica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSylvain Barbot
Sylvain Barbot
HLHeng Luo
Heng Luo
TWTeng Wang
Teng Wang
HYHamiel Yariv
Hamiel Yariv
OPOksana Piatibratova
Oksana Piatibratova
Gokhan GurbuzGokhan Gurbuz
Gokhan Gurbuz
On February 6, 2023, two large earthquakes occurred near the Turkish town of Kahramanmaraş. The moment magnitude (Mw) 7.8 mainshock ruptured a 310 km-long segment of the left-lateral East Anatolian Fault, propagating through multiple releasing step-overs. The Mw 7.6 aftershock involved nearby left-lateral strike-slip faults of the East Anatolian Fault Zone, causing a 150 km-long rupture. We use remote-sensing observations to constrain the spatial distribution of coseismic slip for these two events and the February 20 Mw 6.4 aftershock near Antakya. Pixel tracking of optical and synthetic aperture radar data of the Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-1 satellites, respectively, provide near-field surface displacements. High-rate Global Navigation Satellite System data constrain each event separately. Coseismic slip extends from the surface to about 15 km depth with a shallow slip deficit. Most aftershocks cluster at major fault bends, surround the regions of high coseismic slip, or extend outward of the ruptured faults. For the mainshock, rupture propagation stopped southward at the diffuse termination of the East Anatolian fault and tapered off northward into the Pütürge segment, some 20 km south of the 2020 Mw 6.8 Elaziğ earthquake, highlighting a potential seismic gap. These events underscore the high seismic potential of immature fault systems.

19 January 2024 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CRChunmei Ren
Chunmei Ren
ZWZexin Wang
Zexin Wang
TTTuncay Taymaz
Tuncay Taymaz
NHNan Hu
Nan Hu
HLHeng Luo
Heng Luo
HDHongyang Ding
Hongyang Ding
On 6 February 2023, two large earthquakes (moment magnitude 7.8 and 7.6) shocked a vast area of southeastern Türkiye and northern Syria, leading to heavy casualties and economic loss. To investigate the rupture process over multiple fault segments, we performed a comprehensive analysis of local seismic and geodetic data and determined supershear ruptures on the initial branch and the Pazarcık and Erkenek segments and subshear ruptures on the Amanos segment of event 1. The bilateral rupture of event 2 also presents distinct sub- and supershear velocities. The dynamic stress of the branch fault rupture triggered the Pazarcık segment initial rupture at a point 9 kilometers west of the junction of these two faults, boosting the supershear rupture of the Pazarcık segment of the main fault. The geometry and prestress level of multiple segments controlled the rupture behaviors and influenced the ground shaking intensity.

1 January 2018 in Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TWTeng Wang
Teng Wang
SWShengji Wei
Shengji Wei
XSXuhua Shi
Xuhua Shi
QQQiang Qiu
Qiang Qiu
LLLinlin Li
Linlin Li
SBSylvain Barbot
Sylvain Barbot

11 April 2024 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QZQi Zhang
Qi Zhang
TWTeng Wang
Teng Wang
This article offers a comprehensive AI-centric review of deep learning in exploring landslides with remote-sensing techniques, breaking new ground beyond traditional methodologies. We categorize deep learning tasks into five key frameworks—classification, detection, segmentation, sequence, and the hybrid framework—and analyze their specific applications in landslide-related tasks. Following the presented frameworks, we review state-or-art studies and provide clear insights into the powerful capability of deep learning models for landslide detection, mapping, susceptibility mapping, and displacement prediction. We then discuss current challenges and future research directions, emphasizing areas like model generalizability and advanced network architectures. Aimed at serving both newcomers and experts on remote sensing and engineering geology, this review highlights the potential of deep learning in advancing landslide risk management and preservation.