The electric wheel loader is a new prototype in powertrains and drivetrains that saves energy consumption and diminishes emissions as earthmoving machinery. Dual-motor drive in the front and rear axles of electric wheel loaders helps the distribution of drive torque. However, challenges arise during shoveling conditions, particularly when one motor generates torque exceeding the ground’s adhesion force, leading to tire slippage. This study thoroughly examines the mechanical structure of the working unit and elucidates the correlation between wheel load and hydraulic pressure in the base chamber of the tilt cylinder. This analysis is accomplished through a combination of theoretical derivations and experimental tests. The experiments involve a 5 ton rated load electric wheel loader tested across five running cases as well as weighing tests on a 15 ton rated load electric wheel loader. Based on the experiment discoveries, a dual-motor drive electric wheel loader is designed with specific transmission ratios for the front and rear drivetrains, and a torque distribution strategy is proposed based on wheel load during shoveling. Running condition tests demonstrate sufficient drive force for the new electric wheel loader, and shoveling tests reveal a significant reduction in tire slippage when employing the proposed torque distribution strategy compared to evenly distributed torque in the front and rear axles. Moreover, the driving force during the shoveling process remains undiminished. This indicates that the newly designed loader, in conjunction with the proposed strategy, exhibits excellent shoveling efficiency.

During the operation of a wheel loader, the external load acting on the bucket undergoes many changes, resulting in significant changes in the load ratio on the front and rear axles. For this reason, controlling a standard wheel loader is not trivial. In addition, in the case of a distributed electric wheel loader (DEWL), the operating control algorithm is often complex and is, therefore, the subject of optimization studies. This study compared the electric power consumption across different vertical loads, speeds, and travel directions for single-front, single-rear, and dual-motor configurations, both during transporting and pre-shoveling operations. The analysis led to the development of control rules based on energy-saving objectives. Under the shoveling condition, it was observed that vertical loads can lead to an insufficient driving force and skidding, necessitating the proposal of a new optimized control scheme. The results revealed that the optimal solution for transporting is the single-motor drive control scheme without a mechanical connection between the front and rear motor. With the single-motor control scheme, comparing the preferred controlled motor with the unselected motor under different loads, the average electrical power savings for forward, backward, and circling were at least 3.51%, 3.12%, and 0.34%, respectively. Under the pre-shoveling condition, the optimal control scheme was identified as the single rear motor control scheme, effectively reducing electrical power consumption. In response to the issues encountered during the shoveling condition, an economical solution involving the modification of the front axle transmission ratio has been proposed, along with an optimized control scheme based on vertical load variations.

The presented research on electric wheel loaders lacks a detailed analysis of drive energy-saving during the shovel preparation phase, which is characterized by a high probability of loader tire skidding. To address this issue, this study examines the energy consumption efficiency of a two-motor distributed drive wheel loader under three drive modes including front motor drive, rear motor drive, and dual-motor drive, taking into account the change in the drive force demand caused by the bucket landing. This study finds that the motor energy conversion efficiency is the greatest in single-motor drive mode when the bucket does not generate positive pressure with the ground. In dual-motor drive mode, the total torque overcome is greater, but the motor energy conversion efficiency is the greatest when the bucket generates the greatest positive pressure with the ground. This study suggests that in future designs of electric loaders, two motors can be used to distribute the drive, but the front and rear motors should be designed to participate in the drive with a certain torque distribution ratio at different speeds and resistance to avoid the phenomenon of the bucket pressing the ground too much.

Research on electric wheel loaders (EWLs) has predominantly focused on battery management, hybrid technologies, and energy recovery. However, the influence of motor types and drivetrains on the drive performance of EWLs has received little attention in previous studies. This case study addresses this gap by examining different EWL configurations and analyzing the drive theory and force requirements by integrating classic vehicle theory with EWL-specific characteristics. The study compares an original EWL, equipped with Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors (PMSMs) on both the front and rear axles with identical transmission ratios of 22.85, to a modified EWL, which features a Switched Reluctance Motor (SRM) on the front axle and a transmission ratio of 44.05. Walking and shoveling tests were conducted to evaluate performance. The walking test results reveal that, at motor speeds of 200 rpm, 400 rpm, and 600 rpm, energy consumption in R-drive mode is 68.56%, 71.88%, and 74.87% of that in F-drive mode when two PMSMs are used. When an SRM is applied with a transmission ratio of 44.05, these values shift to 73.90%, 70.35%, and 67.72%, respectively. This demonstrates that using the rear motor alone for driving under walking conditions can yield greater energy savings. The shoveling test results indicate that distributing torque according to wheel load reduces rear wheel slippage, and the SRM with a transmission ratio of 44.05 delivers sufficient drive force while operating within a high-efficiency speed range for the EWL.