The advancement in water treatment technology has revolutionized the progress of membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology in the modern era. The large space requirement, low efficiency, and high cost of the traditional activated sludge process have given the necessary space for the MBR system to come into action. The conventional activated sludge (CAS) process and tertiary filtration can be replaced by immersed and side-stream MBR. This article outlines the historical advancement of the MBR process in the treatment of industrial and municipal wastewaters. The structural features and design parameters of MBR, e.g., membrane surface properties, permeate flux, retention time, pH, alkalinity, temperature, cleaning frequency, etc., highly influence the efficiency of the MBR process. The submerged MBR can handle lower permeate flux (requires less power), whereas the side-stream MBR can handle higher permeate flux (requires more power). However, MBR has some operational issues with conventional water treatment technologies. The quality of sludge, equipment requirements, and fouling are major drawbacks of the MBR process. This review paper also deals with the approach to address these constraints. However, given the energy limitations, climatic changes, and resource depletion, conventional wastewater treatment systems face significant obstacles. When compared with CAS, MBR has better permeate quality, simpler operational management, and a reduced footprint requirement. Thus, for sustainable water treatment, MBR can be an efficient tool.

Multiple factors influence chemical process design and technology selection, including technical, economic, environmental, and safety considerations. Traditionally, a techno-economic analysis has been used to select a base case design, while safety and environmental impact have been subsequently assessed. This may leave out designs that exhibit better environmental and safety performance than the selected base case at a very early stage of design, where abundant opportunities for incorporating these objectives are present. Furthermore, although safety is an integral part of the overall sustainability of a chemical plant, historically it has been addressed separately from sustainability. Thus, there is a growing awareness for simultaneous consideration of these objectives during the conceptual process design phase of a project in order to select the most sustainable process route. The key to an effective sustainability assessment method for selecting the most sustainable process route involves the parsimonious selection of adequate metrics which define the sustainability profile of the process and an integrated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework. In this context, this work investigates gaps in conceptual process design and existing sustainability assessment methods through a review of existing environmental impact and safety assessment methodologies/tools. A possible workflow that incorporates both safety and environmental impact in a holistic multi-criterion decision-making framework (MCDM) has been proposed to select the most sustainable process route. The use of this framework is illustrated through a simple case study involving assessing solvent alternatives for palm oil recovery to highlight the scope and significance of the proposed framework.