Ethanol (EtOH) alters many cellular processes in yeast. An integrated view of different EtOH-tolerant phenotypes and their long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) is not yet available. Here, large-scale data integration showed the core EtOH-responsive pathways, lncRNAs, and triggers of higher (HT) and lower (LT) EtOH-tolerant phenotypes. LncRNAs act in a strain-specific manner in the EtOH stress response. Network and omics analyses revealed that cells prepare for stress relief by favoring activation of life-essential systems. Therefore, longevity, peroxisomal, energy, lipid, and RNA/protein metabolisms are the core processes that drive EtOH tolerance. By integrating omics, network analysis, and several other experiments, we showed how the HT and LT phenotypes may arise: (1) the divergence occurs after cell signaling reaches the longevity and peroxisomal pathways, with CTA1 and ROS playing key roles; (2) signals reaching essential ribosomal and RNA pathways via SUI2 enhance the divergence; (3) specific lipid metabolism pathways also act on phenotype-specific profiles; (4) HTs take greater advantage of degradation and membraneless structures to cope with EtOH stress; and (5) our EtOH stress-buffering model suggests that diauxic shift drives EtOH buffering through an energy burst, mainly in HTs. Finally, critical genes, pathways, and the first models including lncRNAs to describe nuances of EtOH tolerance are reported here.

Ethanol alters many subsystems of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, including the cell cycle. Two ethanol-responsive lncRNAs in yeast interact with cell cycle proteins, and here, we investigated the role of these RNAs in cell cycle. Our network dynamic modeling showed that higher and lower ethanol-tolerant strains undergo cell cycle arrest in mitosis and G1 phases, respectively, during ethanol stress. The higher population rebound of the lower ethanol-tolerant phenotype after stress relief responds to the late phase arrest. We found that the lncRNA lnc9136 of SEY6210 (a lower ethanol-tolerant strain) induces cells to skip mitosis arrest. Simulating an overexpression of lnc9136 and analyzing CRISPR–Cas9 mutants lacking this lncRNA suggest that lnc9136 induces a regular cell cycle even under ethanol stress, indirectly regulating Swe1p and Clb1/2 by binding to Gin4p and Hsl1p. Notably, lnc10883 of BY4742 (a higher ethanol-tolerant strain) does not prevent G1 arrest in this strain under ethanol stress. However, lnc19883 circumvents DNA and spindle damage checkpoints, maintaining a functional cell cycle by interacting with Mec1p or Bub1p even in the presence of DNA/spindle damage. Overall, we present the first evidence of direct roles for lncRNAs in regulating yeast cell cycle proteins, the dynamics of this system in different ethanol-tolerant phenotypes, and a new yeast cell cycle model.

Background/Objectives: Translation and the formation of membraneless organelles are linked mechanisms to promote cell stress surveillance. LncRNAs responsive to ethanol stress transcr_9136 of the SEY6210 strain and transcr_10027 of the BY4742 strain appear to act on tolerance to ethanol in these strains. Here, we investigate whether the ethanol responsiveness of transcr_9136 and transcr_10027 and their role in ethanol stress are associated with protein biogenesis and membraneless organelle assembly. Methods: SEY6210 transcr_9136∆ and BY4742 transcr_10027∆ and their wild-type counterparts were subjected to their maximum ethanol-tolerant stress. The expression of the transcr_9136, transcr_10027, ILT1, RRP1, 27S, 25S, TIR3, and FAA3 genes was accessed by qPCR. The level of DCP1a, PABP, and eIF4E proteins was evaluated by Western blotting. Bioinformatics analyses allowed us to check whether transcr_9136 may regulate the expression of RRP1 and predict the interaction between transcr_10027 and Tel1p. The cell death rate of SEY6210 strains under control and ethanol stress conditions was assessed by flow cytometry. Finally, we evaluated the total protein yield of all strains analyzed. Results: The results demonstrated that transcr_9136 of SEY6210 seems to control the expression of RRP1 and 27S rRNA and reduce the general translation. Furthermore, transcr_9136 seems to act on cell membrane integrity. Transcr_10027 of BY4742 appears to inhibit processing body formation and induce a general translation level. Conclusions: This is the first report on the effect of lncRNAs on yeast protein synthesis and new mechanisms of stress-responsive lncRNAs in yeast, with potential industrial applications such as ethanol production.

Ethanol (EtOH) is a substantial stressor for Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Data integration from strains with different phenotypes, including EtOH stress-responsive lncRNAs, are still not available. We covered these issues seeking systems modifications that drive the divergences between higher (HT) and lower (LT) EtOH tolerant strains under their highest stress conditions. We showed that these phenotypes are neither related to high viability nor faster population rebound after stress relief. LncRNAs work on many stress-responsive systems in a strain-specific manner promoting the EtOH tolerance. Cells use membraneless RNA/protein storage and degradation systems to endure the stress harming, and lncRNAs jointly promote EtOH tolerance. CTA1 and longevity are primer systems promoting phenotype-specific gene expression. The lower cell viability and growth under stress is a byproduct of sphingolipids and inositol phosphorylceramide dampening, acerbated in HTs by sphinganine, ERG9, and squalene overloads; LTs diminish this harm by accumulating inositol 1-phosphate. The diauxic shift drives an EtOH buffering by promoting an energy burst under stress, mainly in HTs. Analysis of mutants showed genes and lncRNAs in three strains critical for their EtOH tolerance. Finally, longevity, peroxisome, energy and lipid metabolisms, RNA/protein degradation and storage systems are the main pathways driving the EtOH tolerance phenotypes.

The ethanol disturbs the cell cycle, transcription, translation, protein folding, cell wall, membranes, and many Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic processes. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are regulatory molecules binding onto the genome or proteins. The number of lncRNAs described for yeast is still scarce, and little is known concerning their roles in the system. There is a lack of knowledge concerning how lncRNAs are responsive to the ethanol tolerance in yeast and whether they act in this tolerance. Hence, by using RNA-Seq data from S. cerevisiae strains with different ethanol tolerance phenotypes, we found the severe ethanol responsive lncRNAs. We modeled how they participate in the ethanol tolerance by analyzing lncRNA-protein interactions. The results showed that the EtOH tolerance responsive lncRNAs, in both higher tolerant and lower tolerant phenotypes, work on different pathways: cell wall, cell cycle, growth, longevity, cell surveillance, ribosome biogenesis, intracellular transport, trehalose metabolism, transcription, and nutrient shifts. In summary, lncRNAs seems to interconnect essential systems’ modules to overcome the ethanol stress. Finally, here we also found the most extensive catalog of lncRNAs in yeast.

Ethanol impairs many subsystems of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , including the cell cycle. Cyclins and damage checkpoints drive the cell cycle. Two ethanol-responsive lncRNAs in yeast interact with cell cycle proteins, and here we investigated the role of these RNAs on the ethanol-stressed cell cycle. Our network dynamic modeling showed that the higher and lower ethanol tolerant strains undergo a cell cycle arrest during the ethanol stress. However, lower tolerant phenotype arrest in a later phase leading to its faster population rebound after the stress relief. Two lncRNAs can skip the arrests mentioned. The in silico overexpression of lnc9136 of SEY6210 (a lower tolerant strain), and CRISPR-Cas9 partial deletions of this lncRNA, evidenced that the one induces a regular cell cycle even under ethanol stress; this lncRNA binds to Gin4 and Hsl1, driving the Swe1p, Clb1/2, and cell cycle. Moreover, the lnc10883 of BY4742 (a higher tolerant strain) interacts to the Mec1p and represses Bub1p, circumventing the DNA and spindle damage checkpoints keeping a normal cell cycle even under DNA damage. Overall, we present the first evidence of the direct roles of lncRNAs on cell cycle proteins, the dynamics of this system in different ethanol tolerant phenotypes, and a new cell cycle model.