Ethanol (EtOH) alters many cellular processes in yeast. An integrated view of different EtOH-tolerant phenotypes and their long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) is not yet available. Here, large-scale data integration showed the core EtOH-responsive pathways, lncRNAs, and triggers of higher (HT) and lower (LT) EtOH-tolerant phenotypes. LncRNAs act in a strain-specific manner in the EtOH stress response. Network and omics analyses revealed that cells prepare for stress relief by favoring activation of life-essential systems. Therefore, longevity, peroxisomal, energy, lipid, and RNA/protein metabolisms are the core processes that drive EtOH tolerance. By integrating omics, network analysis, and several other experiments, we showed how the HT and LT phenotypes may arise: (1) the divergence occurs after cell signaling reaches the longevity and peroxisomal pathways, with CTA1 and ROS playing key roles; (2) signals reaching essential ribosomal and RNA pathways via SUI2 enhance the divergence; (3) specific lipid metabolism pathways also act on phenotype-specific profiles; (4) HTs take greater advantage of degradation and membraneless structures to cope with EtOH stress; and (5) our EtOH stress-buffering model suggests that diauxic shift drives EtOH buffering through an energy burst, mainly in HTs. Finally, critical genes, pathways, and the first models including lncRNAs to describe nuances of EtOH tolerance are reported here.

Background/Objectives: Translation and the formation of membraneless organelles are linked mechanisms to promote cell stress surveillance. LncRNAs responsive to ethanol stress transcr_9136 of the SEY6210 strain and transcr_10027 of the BY4742 strain appear to act on tolerance to ethanol in these strains. Here, we investigate whether the ethanol responsiveness of transcr_9136 and transcr_10027 and their role in ethanol stress are associated with protein biogenesis and membraneless organelle assembly. Methods: SEY6210 transcr_9136∆ and BY4742 transcr_10027∆ and their wild-type counterparts were subjected to their maximum ethanol-tolerant stress. The expression of the transcr_9136, transcr_10027, ILT1, RRP1, 27S, 25S, TIR3, and FAA3 genes was accessed by qPCR. The level of DCP1a, PABP, and eIF4E proteins was evaluated by Western blotting. Bioinformatics analyses allowed us to check whether transcr_9136 may regulate the expression of RRP1 and predict the interaction between transcr_10027 and Tel1p. The cell death rate of SEY6210 strains under control and ethanol stress conditions was assessed by flow cytometry. Finally, we evaluated the total protein yield of all strains analyzed. Results: The results demonstrated that transcr_9136 of SEY6210 seems to control the expression of RRP1 and 27S rRNA and reduce the general translation. Furthermore, transcr_9136 seems to act on cell membrane integrity. Transcr_10027 of BY4742 appears to inhibit processing body formation and induce a general translation level. Conclusions: This is the first report on the effect of lncRNAs on yeast protein synthesis and new mechanisms of stress-responsive lncRNAs in yeast, with potential industrial applications such as ethanol production.

Ethanol (EtOH) is a substantial stressor for Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Data integration from strains with different phenotypes, including EtOH stress-responsive lncRNAs, are still not available. We covered these issues seeking systems modifications that drive the divergences between higher (HT) and lower (LT) EtOH tolerant strains under their highest stress conditions. We showed that these phenotypes are neither related to high viability nor faster population rebound after stress relief. LncRNAs work on many stress-responsive systems in a strain-specific manner promoting the EtOH tolerance. Cells use membraneless RNA/protein storage and degradation systems to endure the stress harming, and lncRNAs jointly promote EtOH tolerance. CTA1 and longevity are primer systems promoting phenotype-specific gene expression. The lower cell viability and growth under stress is a byproduct of sphingolipids and inositol phosphorylceramide dampening, acerbated in HTs by sphinganine, ERG9, and squalene overloads; LTs diminish this harm by accumulating inositol 1-phosphate. The diauxic shift drives an EtOH buffering by promoting an energy burst under stress, mainly in HTs. Analysis of mutants showed genes and lncRNAs in three strains critical for their EtOH tolerance. Finally, longevity, peroxisome, energy and lipid metabolisms, RNA/protein degradation and storage systems are the main pathways driving the EtOH tolerance phenotypes.