Sung Ui Shin

Dr. Sung Ui Shin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2022 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BKBo Ra Kwon
Bo Ra Kwon
SSSung Ui Shin
Sung Ui Shin
SKSoo-Yeon Kim
Soo-Yeon Kim
YCYunhee Choi
Yunhee Choi
NCNariya Cho
Nariya Cho
WMWoo Kyung Moon
Woo Kyung Moon
Microcalcifications on mammograms obtained before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), peritumoral edema on MRI scans obtained after NAC, and clinical-pathologic variables were associated with survival ... Background Little is known regarding findings at imaging associated with survival in patients with luminal breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Purpose To determine the relati...

1 January 2020 in Korean Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SKSoo-Yeon Kim
Soo-Yeon Kim
NCNariya Cho
Nariya Cho
YCYunhee Choi
Yunhee Choi
SSSung Ui Shin
Sung Ui Shin
EKEun Sil Kim
Eun Sil Kim
WMWoo Kyung Moon
Woo Kyung Moon
Kim SY, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2020 Feb;21:e52. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0567

4 August 2021 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YDYoon Ah Do
Yoon Ah Do
MJMijung Jang
Mijung Jang
BYBo La Yun
Bo La Yun
SSSung Ui Shin
Sung Ui Shin
BKBohyoung Kim
Bohyoung Kim
SKSun Mi Kim
Sun Mi Kim
The present study evaluated the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis (AI-CAD) compared to that of dedicated breast radiologists in characterizing suspicious microcalcification on mammography. We retrospectively analyzed 435 unilateral mammographies from 420 patients (286 benign; 149 malignant) undergoing biopsy for suspicious microcalcification from June 2003 to November 2019. Commercial AI-CAD was applied to the mammography images, and malignancy scores were calculated. Diagnostic performance was compared between radiologists and AI-CAD using the area under the receiving operator characteristics curve (AUC). The AUCs of radiologists and AI-CAD were not significantly different (0.722 vs. 0.745, p = 0.393). The AUCs of the adjusted category were 0.726, 0.744, and 0.756 with cutoffs of 2%, 10%, and 38.03% for AI-CAD, respectively, which were all significantly higher than those for radiologists alone (all p < 0.05). None of the 27 cases downgraded to category 3 with a cutoff of 2% were confirmed as malignant on pathological analysis, suggesting that unnecessary biopsies could be avoided. Our findings suggest that the diagnostic performance of AI-CAD in characterizing suspicious microcalcification on mammography was similar to that of the radiologists, indicating that it may aid in making clinical decisions regarding the treatment of breast microcalcification.

1 January 2021 in Journal of Breast Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJung Min Chang
Jung Min Chang
HSHee Jung Shin
Hee Jung Shin
JCJi Soo Choi
Ji Soo Choi
SSSung Ui Shin
Sung Ui Shin
BCBo Hwa Choi
Bo Hwa Choi
WMWoo Kyung Moon
Woo Kyung Moon
Chang JM, et al. J Breast Cancer. 2021 Dec;24(6):554-560. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2021.24.e47

1 March 2021 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AYAnn Yi
Ann Yi
MJMyoung-Jin Jang
Myoung-Jin Jang
DYDahae Yim
Dahae Yim
BKBo Ra Kwon
Bo Ra Kwon
SSSung Ui Shin
Sung Ui Shin
JCJung Min Chang
Jung Min Chang
The addition of screening breast US to digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis screening in women at average risk led to a higher abnormal interpretation rate for a modest gain in canc... Background Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with or without digital mammography (DM) is the primary method of breast cancer screening. However, the sufficiency of DBT screening for women at avera...

1 January 2023 in Korean Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SHSu Min Ha
Su Min Ha
AYAnn Yi
Ann Yi
DYDahae Yim
Dahae Yim
MJMyoung-Jin Jang
Myoung-Jin Jang
BKBo Ra Kwon
Bo Ra Kwon
JCJung Min Chang
Jung Min Chang
Ha SM, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2023 Apr;24(4):274-283. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2022.0649