Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is age-dependent and has a high prevalence in the general population. Most patients are managed in ambulatory care. This systematic review provides an updated overview of quality and content of international clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and management of non-dialysis CKD relevant to patients in ambulatory care. We identified guidelines published from 2012-to March 2018 in guideline portals, databases and by manual search. Methodological quality was assessed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. Recommendations were extracted and evaluated. Eight hundred fifty-two publications were identified, 9 of which were eligible guidelines. Methodological quality ranged from 34 to 77%, with domains “scope and purpose” and “clarity of presentation” attaining highest and “applicability” lowest scores. Guidelines were similar in recommendations on CKD definition, screening of patients with diabetes and hypertension, blood pressure targets and referral of patients with progressive or stage G4 CKD. Definition of high risk groups and recommended tests in newly diagnosed CKD varied. Guidelines quality ranged from moderate to high. Guidelines generally agreed on management of patients with high risk or advanced CKD, but varied in regarding the range of recommended measurements, the need for referrals to nephrology, monitoring intervals and comprehensiveness. More research is needed on efficient management of patients with low risk of CKD progression to end stage renal disease.

Background: Fatigue, dyspnea, and lack of energy and concentration are commonly interpreted as indicative of symptomatic anemia and may thus play a role in diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Objective: To investigate the association between symptoms commonly attributed to anemia and the actual presence of anemia. Methods: Data from two independent cohorts of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) were analyzed. Interview data, laboratory data, and physical examination were individually linked with claims data from the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. A complete case analysis using logistic regression models was performed to evaluate the association of anemia with symptoms commonly attributed to anemia. The models were adjusted for confounders such as depression, medication, insomnia, and other medical conditions. Results: A total of 5979 participants (53% female, median age 55) were included in the analysis. Of those, 30% reported fatigue, 16% reported lack of energy, 16% reported lack of concentration, and 29% reported dyspnea and/or weakness. Anemia was prevalent in about 6% (379). The symptoms were more prevalent in participants with anemia. However, participants with anemia were older and had a poorer health status. There was no association in multivariate logistic regression models between the symptoms fatigue, lack of concentration, dyspnea, and/or weakness and anemia. Anemia was associated (OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.13–1.86) with lack of energy in the multivariate analysis. Other factors such as depression, insomnia, and medication were more strongly associated with the symptoms. Conclusion: The clinical symptoms commonly attributed to anemia are unspecific and highly prevalent both in non-anemic and anemic persons. Even in the presence of anemia, other diagnoses should be considered as causes such as depression, heart failure, asthma, and COPD, which are more closely associated with the symptoms. Further diagnostic research is warranted to explore the association of symptoms in different subgroups and settings in order to help clinical decision making.

Background: Although chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent in the general population, little research has been conducted on CKD management in ambulatory care. Objective was to assess management and quality of care by evaluating CKD coding in ambulatory care, patient diagnosis awareness, frequency of monitoring and whether appropriate patients are referred to nephrology. Methods: Clinical data from the population-based cohort Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP-START) were matched with claims data of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. Quality of care was evaluated according international and German recommendations. Results: Data from 1778 participants (56% female, mean age 59 years) were analysed. 10% had eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m² (mean age 74 years), 15% had albuminuria. 21% had CKD as defined by KDIGO. 20% of these were coded and 7% self-reported having CKD. Coding increased with GFR stage (G3a 20%, G3b 61%, G4 75%, G5 100%). Serum creatinine and urinary dip stick testing were billed in the majority of all participants regardless of renal function. Testing frequency partially surpassed recommendations. Nephrology consultation was billed in few cases with stage G3b-G4. Conclusion: CKD coding increased with stage and was performed reliably in stages ≥ G4, while CKD awareness was low. Adherence to monitoring and referral criteria varied, depending on the applicability of monitoring criteria. For assessing quality of care, consent on monitoring, patient education, referral criteria and coordination of care needs to be established, accounting for patient related factors, including age and comorbidity. Trial registration: This study was prospectively registered as DRKS00009812 in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS).

Background: Approximately 10% of adults in Germany have chronic kidney disease (CKD). The prevalence of CKD among patients being cared for by general practitioners is approximately 30%, and its prevalence in nursing homes is over 50%. An S3 guideline has been developed for the management of CKD in primary care. Methods: The guideline is based on publications retrieved by a systematic search of the literature for international guidelines published in the period 2013-2017, and additional searches on specific questions. It was created by the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Allgemein-medizin und Familienmedizin, DEGAM) and consented with the German Societies of Nephrology and Internal Medicine (DGfN, DGIM) and patient representation. Results: Upon the initial diagnosis of CKD (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <60 mL/min), the patient's blood pressure and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) should be measured, and the urine should be examined for hematuria. Monitoring intervals are determined on an individual basis depending on the stage of disease and the patient's general state of health and personal preferences. Nephrological consultation should be obtained if the GFR is less than 30 mL/min, if CKD is initially diagnosed (GFR 30-59 mL/min) in the presence of persistent hematuria without any urological explanation or of albinuria in stage A2 or higher, if the patient has refractory hypertension requiring three or more antihypertensive drugs, or if the renal disease is rapidly progressive. The threshold for referring a patient should be kept low for persons under age 50; persons over age 70 should be referred only if warranted in consideration of their comorbidities and individual health goals. Conclusion: The main elements of the treatment of CKD are the treatment of hypertension and diabetes and the modification of lifestyle factors. An innovation from the primary care practioner's perspective is the assessment of albuminuria with the albumin-to-creatinine ratio.

Little is known on the perspectives of nephrologists on managing non‐dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the experiences and perspectives of nephrologists regarding the interface with general practitioners (GP) and GPs’ management of patients with non‐dialysis CKD, so that barriers to cooperation and need for improved management can be identified. Twenty semi‐structured interviews were conducted for this qualitative study. The interviews were audio‐recorded and coded to be analysed. The concept of knowledge systems served as a sensitising concept. Optimising underlying diseases, medication adaptation and patient awareness of CKD were regarded as the most important treatment measures in CKD management. Differing views exist on who should be responsible for lifestyle interventions, patient education and timing of referral. Nephrologists generally preferred the referral of patients with high progression risk and co‐treatment models in which daily care was performed by GP, but some preferred referral of all patients with early CKD and some nephrologists stated that patient care should be in the hands of nephrologists entirely in case of CKD. Doctor–patient communication predominantly remained within the medical‐scientific knowledge system whereas patients’ everyday knowledge systems were rarely considered. While stressing optimisation of laboratory values, diabetes and hypertension, patients’ perspectives and shared decision‐making to identify and prioritise patients’ individual health goals were rarely considered by nephrologists. Instead, most nephrologists regarded educating patients and GPs as an important part of their professional role. Defining the interface between GPs and nephrologists, with specific recommendations on when to refer and which tasks each professional group should perform can lead to standardisation and improved interdisciplinary management of CKD patients. Addressing patients' everyday knowledge systems can be valuable in formulating and prioritising health goals with patients.

Background: Clinical practice guidelines recommend specialist referral according to different criteria. The aim was to assess recommended and observed referral rate and health care expenditure according to recommendations from: • Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO,2012) • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE,2014) • German Society of Nephrology/German Society of Internal Medicine (DGfN/DGIM,2015) • German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians (DEGAM,2019) • Kidney failure risk equation (NICE,2021) Methods: Data of the population-based cohort Study of Health in Pomerania were matched with claims data. Proportion of subjects meeting referral criteria and corresponding health care expenditures were calculated and projected to the population of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Results: Data from 1927 subjects were analysed. Overall proportion of subjects meeting referral criteria ranged from 4.9% (DEGAM) to 8.3% (DGfN/DGIM). The majority of patients eligible for referral were ≥ 60 years. In subjects older than 60 years, differences were even more pronounced, and rates ranged from 9.7% (DEGAM) to 16.5% (DGfN/DGIM). Estimated population level costs varied between €1,432,440 (DEGAM) and €2,386,186 (DGfN/DGIM). From 190 patients with eGFR < 60 ml/min, 15 had a risk of end stage renal disease > 5% within the next 5 years. Conclusions: Applying different referral criteria results in different referral rates and costs. Referral rates exceed actually observed consultation rates. Criteria need to be evaluated in terms of available workforce, resources and regarding over- and underutilization of nephrology services.