Mostafa Kahani

Dr. Mostafa Kahani

Chemical Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Īrānshahr, Sīstān va Balūchestān, Iran
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2009 in International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SNS.H. Noie
S.H. Noie
SHSaeed Zeinali Heris
Saeed Zeinali Heris
Mostafa KahaniMostafa Kahani
Mostafa Kahani
SNS.M. Nowee
S.M. Nowee

1 January 2019 in International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAlireza Baghban
Alireza Baghban
Mostafa KahaniMostafa Kahani
Mostafa Kahani
MNMohammad Alhuyi Nazari
Mohammad Alhuyi Nazari
MAMohammad Hossein Ahmadi
Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi
WYWei-Mon Yan
Wei-Mon Yan

17 June 2019 in Energy Science & Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMilad Sadeghzadeh
Milad Sadeghzadeh
MAMohammad Hossein Ahmadi
Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi
Mostafa KahaniMostafa Kahani
Mostafa Kahani
HSHossein Sakhaeinia
Hossein Sakhaeinia
HCHossein Chaji
Hossein Chaji
Lingen ChenLingen Chen
Lingen Chen
In the current study, Multilayer Perceptron Artificial Neural Network (MLP‐ANN) mode, Radial Basis Function Artificial Neural Network (RBF‐ANN), and Elman Back Propagation Neural Network (Elamn BP‐ANN) are developed to predict the thermal efficiency of a flat‐plate solar collector. TiO2 (20 nm)/water nanofluids are prepared using two‐step method and used in the designed solar system. All experiments are done in Mashhad city, Iran (Longitude/Latitude: 36.2605°N, 59.6168°E), according to EUROPEAN STANDARD EN 12975‐2 as a quasi‐dynamic test (QDT) method, and the solar collector is exposed to the south with the tilt angle of 55°. Three levels of inlet temperature (ambient air temperature, 52 and 74°C), 3 levels of volumetric flow rate (36, 72, and 108 L/(m2.h)), and 4 levels of nanofluid concentrations (0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 wt.%) are considered as the input data, and the thermal efficiency of the solar system is calculated. According to the output results of developed models, the best prediction of thermal performance is obtained by MLP‐ANN model, although other generated models are also able to predict the efficiency of the solar collector with appropriated accuracy.

1 May 2016 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZTZohre Taghizadeh-Tabari
Zohre Taghizadeh-Tabari
SHSaeed Zeinali Heris
Saeed Zeinali Heris
MMMaryam Moradi
Maryam Moradi
Mostafa KahaniMostafa Kahani
Mostafa Kahani

11 September 2013 in Modern Applied Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HCHossein Chaji
Hossein Chaji
YAYahya Ajabshirchi
Yahya Ajabshirchi
EEEsmaeil Esmaeilzadeh
Esmaeil Esmaeilzadeh
SHSaeed Zeinali Heris
Saeed Zeinali Heris
MHMahdi Hedayatizadeh
Mahdi Hedayatizadeh
Mostafa KahaniMostafa Kahani
Mostafa Kahani
In this study, a small flat plate solar collector (FPSC) was fabricated and tested for studying the effects of different nano particle concentrations of in water as base fluid. Three flow rates (i.e. 36, 72 and 108 lit/m 2 .hr) and four particles concentration ratios (i.e. 0, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 % wt) were investigated. Experimental testing method was selected based on EUROPEAN STANDARD EN 12975-2 as a quasi-dynamic test method (QDT). Adding nano particles to water brought about an improvement of initial efficiency of FPSC between 3.5 and 10.5% and the index of collector total efficiency between 2.6 and 7% relative to base fluid. Also the results indicate that the initial efficiency () for 36, 72 and 108 lit/m 2 .hr flow rates of water as base fluid were 0.4712, 0.4998 and 0.5457, respectively which reveals the increase of 6.1 and 15.8% of it in the two latter cases in comparison with the first case, 36 lit/m 2 .hr flow rate. In addition, the index of collector total efficiency of 72 and 108 lit/m 2 .hr mass flow rates has increased by 6.7 and 15.7%, respectively in comparison with 36 lit/ m 2 .hr mass flow rate.