Background: High incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) has been reported in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Among these patients, we aimed to assess the incidence, outcomes and risk factors of VAP recurrences. Methods: We conducted an observational retrospective study in three French intensive care units (ICUs). Patients admitted for a documented COVID-19 from March 2020 to May 2021 and requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) for ≥48 h were included. The study main outcome was the incidence of VAP recurrences. Secondary outcomes were the duration of MV, ICU and hospital length of stay and mortality according to VAP and recurrences. We also assessed the factors associated with VAP recurrences. Results: During the study period, 398 patients met the inclusion criteria. A total of 236 (59%) of them had at least one VAP episode during their ICU stay and 109 (46%) of these patients developed at least one recurrence. The incidence of VAP recurrence considering death and extubation as competing events was 29.6% (IC = [0.250–0.343]). Seventy-eight percent of recurrences were due to the same bacteria (relapses). Patients with a VAP recurrence had a longer duration of MV as compared with one VAP and no VAP patients (41 (25–56) vs. 16 (8–30) and 10 (5–18) days; p < 0.001) and a longer ICU length of stay (46 (29–66) vs. 22 (12–36) and 14 (9–25) days; p < 0.001). The 90-day mortality was higher in the recurrence group as compared with the no VAP group only (31.2 vs. 21.0% (p = 0.021)). In a multivariate analysis including bacterial co-infection at admission, the use of immunosuppressive therapies and the bacteria responsible for the first VAP episode, the duration of MV was the only factor independently associated with VAP recurrence. Conclusion: In COVID-19 associated respiratory failure, recurrences affected 46% of patients with a first episode of VAP. VAP recurrences were mainly relapses and were associated with a prolonged duration of MV and ICU length of stay but not with a higher mortality. MV duration was the only factor associated with recurrences.

Describe the characteristics of ventilation-acquired pneumonia (VAP) and potential risk factors in critically ill SARS-CoV-2 patients admitted in three French public hospitals during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a monocentric retrospective study in seven Marseille intensive care units (ICUs) aiming to describe VAP characteristics and identify their risk factors. VAP patients were compared to a non-VAP control group. From March to November 2020, 161 patients admitted for viral-induced acute respiratory failure (ARF) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) were included. This cohort was categorized in two groups according to the development or not of a VAP during their stay in ICU. 82 patients (51%) developed ventilation-acquired pneumonia. Most of them were men (77%) and 55% had hypertension. In the VAP population, 31 out of 82 patients (38%) had received dexamethasone and 47% were administered antibiotic course prior to ICU admission. An amount of 88% of respiratory infections were late VAPs with a median delay of 10 days from the onset of IMV. Gram negative bacteria were responsible for 62% of VAPs with Pseudomonas spp. being the most documented bacteria. Less than a third of the ICU-acquired infections were due to multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria mainly displaying AmpC cephalosporin hyper production resistance phenotype. Multivariate analysis revealed that early Dexamethasone administration in ICU, male sex, older age and ROX score were risk factors for VAP whereas pre-ICU antimicrobial treatment and higher IGS 2 were protective factors. VAP is a frequent ICU-related complication affecting half of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and requiring IMV. It was responsible for increased morbidity due to a longer ICU and hospital stay. VAP risk factors included demographic factors such as age and sex. Dexamethasone was associated with a threefold greater risk of developing VAP during ICU stay. These results need to be comforted by large multi-centric studies before questioning the only available and effective treatment against SARS-CoV-2 in ICU patients.

Introduction: Lobectomy with lymph node dissection is the gold standard treatment for stage IA–IIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Surgery is responsible for higher early mortality but offers better overall long-term survival. The patient population concerned is often elderly and combines the comorbidities of smoking and age. Several trials have shown good results of stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) in terms of local control and tolerance in elderly subjects. Our objective is to study the survival and regional control of patients over 75 years treated by surgery or SABR for localized NSCLC. Materials and Method: We conducted a single-center retrospective study between January 2012 and December 2022 including elderly patients who received surgery or SABR for NSCLC less than 5 cm in size, N0, M0. A cumulative comorbidity index was calculated for each patient, considering severity and impact of treatment. We performed subgroup analyses using CART method to identify factors impacting survival and early death. Results: After propensity score matching, 127 operated patients were matched to 85 patients treated with SABR. Overall survival at 1 and 5 years for the operated patients was 83.87% and 47.30% compared with 88.8% and 31.5% in the radiotherapy group (p = 0.068). We have identified four factors influencing the incidence of early mortality: gender, World Health Organization Performance status (WHO status), Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV1), and treatment group. Conclusions: Surgery seems to remain the standard of treatment in terms of overall survival and locoregional recurrence, in a context where SABR nevertheless provides excellent local control and tolerance in the short and long term. In order to improve patient selection, we are proposing for the first time a tool to aid therapeutic decision-making.

Background: The management of the aortic root in type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is challenging. Conservative aortic root repair is considered a reasonable option in most cases. This study aimed to analyze medium-term mortality and aortic root reintervention after TAAD. Methods: All patients with TAAD underwent prospective follow-ups between 2017 and 2021. The primary endpoint was the increase in aortic root diameter and the rate of proximal root reintervention. The secondary endpoints were the risk factor and location for root-RAD, and risk factors for severe and moderate AR and mortality during follow-up. Results: A total of 210 patients were included, of which 166 (79.0%) did not have root-RAD and 44 (21.0%) had root-RAD after supracoronary aortic replacement. After a mean follow-up of 41.1 months (0–60), four patients (1.8%) died. No cases of aortic root rupture were reported. Two patients in the root-RAD group underwent aortic root reoperation. The aortic root diameter increased by 0.5 mm/year and 0.09 mm/year in the root-RAD and no-root-RAD groups, respectively (p = 0.18). Root-RAD was a risk factor for severe AR (HR 19.6; 95%CI: 1.6–2.7; p = 0.05) and an independent risk factor for moderate AR (HR 23.0; 95%CI: 2.8–2.9; p = 0.009). Conclusions: Without increasing long-term mortality, root-RAD increases the risks of AR and subsequent aortic root reintervention. Long-term follow-up is essential for monitoring aortic valve function.