John Kirkegaard

Dr. John Kirkegaard


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2007 in The Plant Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BDBruno Dombrecht
Bruno Dombrecht
GXGang Ping Xue
Gang Ping Xue
SSSusan J. Sprague
Susan J. Sprague
JKJohn Kirkegaard
John Kirkegaard
JRJohn J. Ross
John J. Ross
KKKemal Kazan
Kemal Kazan
The Arabidopsis thaliana basic helix-loop-helix Leu zipper transcription factor (TF) MYC2/JIN1 differentially regulates jasmonate (JA)-responsive pathogen defense (e.g., PDF1.2) and wound response (e.g., VSP) genes. In this study, genome-wide transcriptional profiling of wild type and mutant myc2/jin1 plants followed by functional analyses has revealed new roles for MYC2 in the modulation of diverse JA functions. We found that MYC2 negatively regulates Trp and Trp-derived secondary metabolism such as indole glucosinolate biosynthesis during JA signaling. Furthermore, MYC2 positively regulates JA-mediated resistance to insect pests, such as Helicoverpa armigera, and tolerance to oxidative stress, possibly via enhanced ascorbate redox cycling and flavonoid biosynthesis. Analyses of MYC2 cis binding elements and expression of MYC2-regulated genes in T-DNA insertion lines of a subset of MYC2–regulated TFs suggested that MYC2 might modulate JA responses via differential regulation of an intermediate spectrum of TFs with activating or repressing roles in JA signaling. MYC2 also negatively regulates its own expression, and this may be one of the mechanisms used in fine-tuning JA signaling. Overall, these results provide new insights into the function of MYC2 and the transcriptional coordination of the JA signaling pathway.

1 June 2016 in Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSamiran Banerjee
Samiran Banerjee
CKClive A. Kirkby
Clive A. Kirkby
DSDione Schmutter
Dione Schmutter
ABAndrew Bissett
Andrew Bissett
JKJohn Kirkegaard
John Kirkegaard
ARAlan E. Richardson
Alan E. Richardson

1 May 2012 in Journal of Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AWA. P. Wasson
A. P. Wasson
RRR. A. Richards
R. A. Richards
RCR. Chatrath
R. Chatrath
SMS. C. Misra
S. C. Misra
SPS. V. S. Prasad
S. V. S. Prasad
MWMichelle Watt
Michelle Watt
Wheat yields globally will depend increasingly on good management to conserve rainfall and new varieties that use water efficiently for grain production. Here we propose an approach for developing new varieties to make better use of deep stored water. We focus on water-limited wheat production in the summer-dominant rainfall regions of India and Australia, but the approach is generally applicable to other environments and root-based constraints. Use of stored deep water is valuable because it is more predictable than variable in-season rainfall and can be measured prior to sowing. Further, this moisture is converted into grain with twice the efficiently of in-season rainfall since it is taken up later in crop growth during the grain-filling period when the roots reach deeper layers. We propose that wheat varieties with a deeper root system, a redistribution of branch root density from the surface to depth, and with greater radial hydraulic conductivity at depth would have higher yields in rainfed systems where crops rely on deep water for grain fill. Developing selection systems for mature root system traits is challenging as there are limited high-throughput phenotyping methods for roots in the field, and there is a risk that traits selected in the lab on young plants will not translate into mature root system traits in the field. We give an example of a breeding programme that combines laboratory and field phenotyping with proof of concept evaluation of the trait at the beginning of the selection programme. This would greatly enhance confidence in a high-throughput laboratory or field screen, and avoid investment in screens without yield value. This approach requires careful selection of field sites and years that allow expression of deep roots and increased yield. It also requires careful selection and crossing of germplasm to allow comparison of root expression among genotypes that are similar for other traits, especially flowering time and disease and toxicity resistances. Such a programme with field and laboratory evaluation at the outset will speed up delivery of varieties with improved root systems for higher yield.

1 July 2011 in Geoderma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CKC.A. Kirkby
C.A. Kirkby
JKJohn Kirkegaard
John Kirkegaard
ARA.E. Richardson
A.E. Richardson
LWLen J. Wade
Len J. Wade
CBChristopher Blanchard
Christopher Blanchard
GBG. Batten
G. Batten

1 June 2008 in Field Crops Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJohn Kirkegaard
John Kirkegaard
OCOlaf Christen
Olaf Christen
JKJoseph Krupinsky
Joseph Krupinsky
DLDavid Layzell
David Layzell

28 October 2015 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KGKen E Giller
Ken E Giller
JAJens A. Andersson
Jens A. Andersson
MCMarc Corbeels
Marc Corbeels
JKJohn Kirkegaard
John Kirkegaard
DMDavid Mortensen
David Mortensen
BVBernard Vanlauwe
Bernard Vanlauwe
Global support for Conservation Agriculture (CA) as a pathway to Sustainable Intensification is strong. CA revolves around three principles: no-till (or minimal soil disturbance), soil cover, and crop rotation. The benefits arising from the ease of crop management, energy/cost/time savings and soil and water conservation led to widespread adoption of CA, particularly on large farms in the Americas and Australia, where farmers harness the tools of modern science: highly-sophisticated machines, potent agrochemicals and biotechnology. Over the past ten years CA has been promoted among smallholder farmers in the (sub-) tropics, often with disappointing results. Growing evidence challenges the claims that CA increases crop yields and builds-up soil carbon although increased stability of crop yields in dry climates is evident. Our analyses suggest pragmatic adoption on larger mechanized farms, and limited uptake of CA by smallholder farmers in developing countries. We propose a rigorous, context-sensitive approach based on Systems Agronomy to analyze and explore sustainable intensification options, including the potential of CA. There is an urgent need to move beyond dogma and prescriptive approaches to provide soil and crop management options for farmers to enable the Sustainable Intensification of agriculture.