Background Early and accurate diagnosis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and actinic keratoses (AK) is fundamental to reduce their associated morbidity and to select the correct treatment. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) is a new imaging device that can characterize healthy skin and basal cell carcinoma, but no large studies on keratinocyte cell tumours have yet been published. Aim To identify and describe LC-OCT criteria associated with SCC and AK, and to compare LC-OCT findings in these tumours. Methods A retrospective observational multicentre study was conducted. Lesions were imaged with the LC-OCT device before surgery and examined histologically. LC-OCT criteria for AK/SCC were identified and their presence was evaluated in all study lesions. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare AK and SCCs, and to investigate differences between in situ and invasive tumours. Results In total, 158 patients with 50 AK and 108 SCCs (62 in situ and 46 invasive) were included. Cytological and architectural alterations were found in most lesions, and differences were found between AK and SCCs. Although the visualization of the dermoepidermal junction (DEJ) was often hampered by hyperkeratosis and acanthosis, an outlined DEJ without broad strands was observed in almost all AK and almost all in situ SCCs, but in only three invasive SCCs (P < 0.001) when the DEJ was detectable. Conclusion Our results suggest that LC-OCT can help clinicians in the identification of AK and SCC and their differentiation, providing a real-time and noninvasive examination. Further studies are needed to confirm our data.

The growing incidence of skin cancer, with its associated mortality and morbidity, has in recent years led to the developing of new non-invasive technologies, which allow an earlier and more accurate diagnosis. Some of these, such as digital photography, 2D and 3D total-body photography and dermoscopy are now widely used and others, such as reflectance confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography, are limited to a few academic and referral skin cancer centers because of their cost or the long training period required. Health care professionals involved in the treatment of patients with skin cancer need to know the implications and benefits of new non-invasive technologies for dermatological oncology. In this article we review the characteristics and usability of the main diagnostic imaging methods available today.

Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) is a new, noninvasive imaging technique for the diagnosis of skin cancers. A total of 243 benign (54%) and malignant (46%) skin lesions were consecutively enrolled from 27 August 2020, to 6 October 2021 at the Dermatology Department of the University Hospital of Siena, Italy. Dermoscopic- and LC-OCT-based diagnoses were given by an expert dermatologist and compared with the ground truth. Considering all types of malignant skin tumours (79 basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), 22 squamous cell carcinomas, and 10 melanomas), a statistically significant increase (p = 0.013) in specificity was observed from dermoscopy (0.73, CI 0.64–0.81) to LC-OCT (0.87, CI 0.79–0.93) while sensitivity was the same with the two imaging techniques (0.95 CI 0.89–0.98 for dermoscopy and 0.95 CI 0.90–0.99 for LC-OCT). The increase in specificity was mainly driven by the ability of LC-OCT to differentiate BCCs from other diagnoses. In conclusion, our real-life study showed that LC-OCT can play an important role in helping the noninvasive diagnosis of malignant skin neoplasms and especially of BCCs. LC-OCT could be positioned after the dermoscopic examination, to spare useless biopsy of benign lesions without decreasing sensitivity.

Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) can help the clinical diagnosis of skin diseases. The present study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of LC-OCT for the diagnosis of the most frequent non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), i.e., basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Comparing LC-OCT diagnostic performances with those of dermoscopy, histopathological examination was used as a gold standard. For every study endpoint, the diagnostic ability of LC-OCT revealed superiority over the dermoscopic examination. In particular, a significant increase in specificity was observed. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy and LC-OCT for the diagnosis of malignancy were, respectively, 0.97 (CI 0.94–0.99), 0.43 (CI 0.36–0.51), and 0.77 (CI 0.72–0.81) for dermoscopy and 0.99 (CI 0.97–1.00), 0.90 (CI 0.84–0.94), and 0.96 (CI 0.93–0.97) for LC-OCT. The positive predictive value (PPV) resulted in 0.74 (CI 0.69–0.78) for dermoscopy and 0.94 (CI 0.91–0.97) for LC-OCT, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 0.89 (CI 0.81–0.95) for dermoscopy and 0.98 (CI 0.95–1.00) for LC-OCT. Finally, our real-life study showed a potentially important role of LC-OCT in the non-invasive diagnosis of NMSCs, especially BCC. The real-time imaging technique could spare unnecessary biopsies with an increased sensitivity, a much higher specificity, and better accuracy than clinical assessment with dermoscopy alone.