Vehicle dynamics control systems have a fundamental role in smart and autonomous mobility, where one of the most crucial aspects is the vehicle body velocity estimation. In this paper, the problem of a correct evaluation of the vehicle longitudinal velocity for dynamic control applications is approached using a neural networks technique employing a set of measured samples referring to signals usually available on-board, such as longitudinal and lateral acceleration, steering angle, yaw rate and linear wheel speed. Experiments were run on four professional driving circuits with very different characteristics, and the vehicle longitudinal velocity was estimated with different neural network training policies and validated through comparison with the measurements of the one acquired at the vehicle’s center of gravity, provided by an optical Correvit sensor, which serves as the reference (and, therefore, exact) velocity values. The results obtained with the proposed methodology are in good agreement with the reference values in almost all tested conditions, covering both the linear and the nonlinear behavior of the car, proving that artificial neural networks can be efficiently employed onboard, thereby enriching the standard set of control and safety-related electronics.

In the last few decades, the role of vehicle dynamics control systems has become crucial. In this complex scenario, the correct real-time estimation of the vehicle’s sideslip angle is decisive. Indeed, this quantity is deeply linked to several aspects, such as traction and stability optimization, and its correct understanding leads to the possibility of reaching greater road safety, increased efficiency, and a better driving experience for both autonomous and human-controlled vehicles. This paper aims to estimate accurately the sideslip angle of the vehicle using different neural network configurations. Then, the proposed approach involves using two separate neural networks in a dual-network architecture. The first network is dedicated to estimating the longitudinal velocity, while the second network predicts the sideslip angle and takes the longitudinal velocity estimate from the first network as input. This enables the creation of a virtual sensor to replace the real one. To obtain a reliable training dataset, several test sessions were conducted on different tracks with various layouts and characteristics, using the same reference instrumented vehicle. Starting from the acquired channels, such as lateral and longitudinal acceleration, steering angle, yaw rate, and angular wheel speeds, it has been possible to estimate the sideslip angle through different neural network architectures and training strategies. The goodness of the approach was assessed by comparing the estimations with the measurements obtained from an optical sensor able to provide accurate values of the target variable. The obtained results show a robust alignment with the reference values in a great number of tested conditions. This confirms that the adoption of artificial neural networks represents a reliable strategy to develop real-time virtual sensors for onboard solutions, expanding the information available for controls.

This review surveys theoretical frameworks developed to describe rubber contact and friction on rough surfaces, with a particular focus on tire–road interaction. It begins with classical continuum approaches, which provide valuable foundations but show limitations when applied to viscoelastic materials and multiscale roughness. More recent formulations are then examined, including the Klüppel–Heinrich model, which couples fractal surface descriptions with viscoelastic dissipation, and Persson’s theory, which applies a statistical mechanics perspective and later integrates flash temperature effects. Grosch’s pioneering experimental work is also revisited as a key empirical reference linking friction, velocity, and temperature. A comparative discussion highlights the ability of these models to capture scale-dependent contact and energy dissipation while also noting practical challenges such as calibration requirements, parameter sensitivity, and computational costs. Persistent issues include the definition of cutoff criteria for roughness spectra, the treatment of adhesion under realistic operating conditions, and the translation of detailed power spectral density (PSD) data into usable inputs for predictive models. The review emphasizes progress in connecting material rheology, surface characterization, and operating conditions but also underscores the gap between theoretical predictions and real tire–road performance. Bridging this gap will require hybrid approaches that combine physics-based and data-driven methods, supported by advances in surface metrology, in situ friction measurements, and machine learning. Overall, the paper provides a critical synthesis of current models and outlines future directions toward more predictive and application-oriented tire–road friction modeling.

One of the main challenges in maximizing vehicle performance is to predict and optimize tire behavior in different working conditions, such as temperature, friction, and wear. Starting from several approaches to develop tire grip and wear models, based on physical principles, experimental data, or statistical methods available in the literature, this work aims to propose a novel tire wear model that combines physical and statistical analysis on a large number of high-performance vehicle telemetries, tracks, and road data, as well as tires’ viscoelastic properties. Another contribution of this multidisciplinary study is the definition of the functional relationships that govern the tire–road interaction in terms of friction and degradation, conducting a thorough analysis of the car’s telemetry, the track and asphalt features, and the viscoelastic properties of the tires.