Dieter Leichtle

Dr. Dieter Leichtle

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 June 2017 in Nuclear Fusion
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XLX. Litaudon
X. Litaudon
SAS. Abduallev
S. Abduallev
MAM. Abhangi
M. Abhangi
PAP. Abreu
P. Abreu
MAM. Afzal
M. Afzal
JCJet Contributors
Jet Contributors

30 August 2019 in Nuclear Fusion
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EJE. Joffrin
E. Joffrin
SAS. Abduallev
S. Abduallev
MAM. Abhangi
M. Abhangi
PAP. Abreu
P. Abreu
VAV. Afanasev
V. Afanasev
IZI. Zychor
I. Zychor
For the past several years, the JET scientific programme (Pamela et al 2007 Fusion Eng. Des. 82 590) has been engaged in a multi-campaign effort, including experiments in D, H and T, leading up to 2020 and the first experiments with 50%/50% D–T mixtures since 1997 and the first ever D–T plasmas with the ITER mix of plasma-facing component materials. For this purpose, a concerted physics and technology programme was launched with a view to prepare the D–T campaign (DTE2). This paper addresses the key elements developed by the JET programme directly contributing to the D–T preparation. This intense preparation includes the review of the physics basis for the D–T operational scenarios, including the fusion power predictions through first principle and integrated modelling, and the impact of isotopes in the operation and physics of D–T plasmas (thermal and particle transport, high confinement mode (H-mode) access, Be and W erosion, fuel recovery, etc). This effort also requires improving several aspects of plasma operation for DTE2, such as real time control schemes, heat load control, disruption avoidance and a mitigation system (including the installation of a new shattered pellet injector), novel ion cyclotron resonance heating schemes (such as the three-ions scheme), new diagnostics (neutron camera and spectrometer, active Alfvèn eigenmode antennas, neutral gauges, radiation hard imaging systems…) and the calibration of the JET neutron diagnostics at 14 MeV for accurate fusion power measurement. The active preparation of JET for the 2020 D–T campaign provides an incomparable source of information and a basis for the future D–T operation of ITER, and it is also foreseen that a large number of key physics issues will be addressed in support of burning plasmas.

1 November 2018 in Fusion Engineering and Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDieter Leichtle
Dieter Leichtle
BCBethany Colling
Bethany Colling
MFMarco Fabbri
Marco Fabbri
RJRafael Juarez
Rafael Juarez
MLMichael Loughlin
Michael Loughlin
LBLuciano Bertalot
Luciano Bertalot

1 August 2012 in Fusion Engineering and Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMitja Majerle
Mitja Majerle
DLDieter Leichtle
Dieter Leichtle
UFUlrich Fischer
Ulrich Fischer
ARKADY SERIKOVARKADY SERIKOV
ARKADY SERIKOV

19 July 2012 in Nuclear Fusion
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBP. Batistoni
P. Batistoni
Maurizio AngeloneMaurizio Angelone
Maurizio Angelone
UFU. Fischer
U. Fischer
AKA. Klix
A. Klix
IKI. Kodeli
I. Kodeli
RVR. Villari
R. Villari
Two neutronics experiments have been carried out at 14 MeV neutron sources on mock-ups of the helium cooled pebble bed (HCBP) and the helium cooled lithium lead (HCLL) variants of ITER test blanket modules (TBMs). These experiments have provided an experimental validation of the calculations of the tritium production rate (TPR) in the two blanket concepts and an assessment of the uncertainties due to the uncertainties on nuclear data. This paper provides a brief summary of the HCPB experiment and then focuses in particular on the final results of the HCLL experiment. The TPR has been measured in the HCLL mock-up irradiated for long times at the Frascati 14 MeV Neutron Generator (FNG). Redundant and well-assessed experimental techniques have been used to measure the TPR by different teams for inter-comparison. Measurements of the neutron and gamma-ray spectra have also been performed. The analysis of the experiment, carried out by the MCNP code with FENDL-2.1 and JEFF-3.1.1 nuclear data libraries, and also including sensitivity/uncertainty analysis, shows good agreement between measurements and calculations, within the total uncertainty of 5.9% at 1σ level.

1 October 2013 in Fusion Engineering and Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DGD. Große
D. Große
UFU. Fischer
U. Fischer
KKK. Kondo
K. Kondo
DLDieter Leichtle
Dieter Leichtle
PPP. Pereslavtsev
P. Pereslavtsev
ARKADY SERIKOVARKADY SERIKOV
ARKADY SERIKOV