ARKADY SERIKOV

Dr. ARKADY SERIKOV

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 April 2008 in Nuclear Fusion
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHM.A. Henderson
M.A. Henderson
RHR. Heidinger
R. Heidinger
DSD. Strauss
D. Strauss
RBR. Bertizzolo
R. Bertizzolo
ABA. Bruschi
A. Bruschi
CZC. Zucca
C. Zucca
The ITER electron cyclotron (EC) upper port antenna (or launcher) is nearing completion of the detailed design stage and the final build-to-print design stage will soon start. The main objective of this launcher is to drive current locally to stabilize the neoclassical tearing modes (NTMs) (depositing ECCD inside of the island that forms on either the q = 3/2 or 2 rational magnetic flux surfaces) and control the sawtooth instability (deposit ECCD near the q = 1 surface). The launcher should be capable of steering the focused beam deposition location to the resonant flux surface over the range in which the q = 1, 3/2 and 2 surfaces are expected to be found for various plasma equilibria susceptible to the onset of NTMs and sawteeth. The aim of this paper is to provide the design status of the principal components that make up the launcher: port plug, mm-wave system and shield block components. The port plug represents the chamber that provides a rigid support structure that houses the mm-wave and shield blocks. The mm-wave system comprises the components used to guide the RF beams through the port plug structure and refocus the beams far into the plasma. The shield block components are used to attenuate the nuclear radiation from the burning plasma, protecting the fragile in-port components and reducing the neutron streaming through the port assembly. The design of these three subsystems is described; in addition, the relevant thermo-mechanical and electro-magnetic analyses are reviewed for critical design issues.

27 March 2015 in Nuclear Fusion
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FRFrancesco Romanelli
Francesco Romanelli
ARKADY SERIKOVARKADY SERIKOV
ARKADY SERIKOV
Salvatore AlmavivaSalvatore Almaviva
Salvatore Almaviva
Wojciech Marek ZabołotnyWojciech Marek Zabołotny
Wojciech Marek Zabołotny
Since the installation of an ITER-like wall, the JET programme has focused on the consolidation of ITER design choices and the preparation for ITER operation, with a specific emphasis given to the bulk tungsten melt experiment, which has been crucial for the final decision on the material choice for the day-one tungsten divertor in ITER. Integrated scenarios have been progressed with the re-establishment of long-pulse, high-confinement H-modes by optimizing the magnetic configuration and the use of ICRH to avoid tungsten impurity accumulation. Stationary discharges with detached divertor conditions and small edge localized modes have been demonstrated by nitrogen seeding. The differences in confinement and pedestal behaviour before and after the ITER-like wall installation have been better characterized towards the development of high fusion yield scenarios in DT. Post-mortem analyses of the plasma-facing components have confirmed the previously reported low fuel retention obtained by gas balance and shown that the pattern of deposition within the divertor has changed significantly with respect to the JET carbon wall campaigns due to the absence of thermally activated chemical erosion of beryllium in contrast to carbon. Transport to remote areas is almost absent and two orders of magnitude less material is found in the divertor.

1 August 2012 in Fusion Engineering and Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMitja Majerle
Mitja Majerle
DLDieter Leichtle
Dieter Leichtle
UFUlrich Fischer
Ulrich Fischer
ARKADY SERIKOVARKADY SERIKOV
ARKADY SERIKOV

1 October 2014 in Fusion Engineering and Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RVR. Villari
R. Villari
UFU. Fischer
U. Fischer
Fabio MoroFabio Moro
Fabio Moro
PPP. Pereslavtsev
P. Pereslavtsev
LPL. Petrizzi
L. Petrizzi
ARKADY SERIKOVARKADY SERIKOV
ARKADY SERIKOV

1 October 2013 in Fusion Engineering and Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DGD. Große
D. Große
UFU. Fischer
U. Fischer
KKK. Kondo
K. Kondo
DLDieter Leichtle
Dieter Leichtle
PPP. Pereslavtsev
P. Pereslavtsev
ARKADY SERIKOVARKADY SERIKOV
ARKADY SERIKOV

1 October 2007 in Fusion Engineering and Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHM.A. Henderson
M.A. Henderson
SAS. Alberti
S. Alberti
PBP. Benin
P. Benin
TBT. Bonicelli
T. Bonicelli
RCR. Chavan
R. Chavan
HZH. Zohm
H. Zohm