Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed and second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Limitations with existing treatment regimens have demanded the search for better treatment options. Different phytochemicals with promising anti-CRC activities have been reported, with the molecular mechanism of actions still emerging. This review aims to summarize recent progress on the study of natural phenolic compounds in ameliorating CRC using in vivo models. This review followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reporting and Meta-Analysis. Information on the relevant topic was gathered by searching the PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases using keywords, such as “colorectal cancer” AND “phenolic compounds”, “colorectal cancer” AND “polyphenol”, “colorectal cancer” AND “phenolic acids”, “colorectal cancer” AND “flavonoids”, “colorectal cancer” AND “stilbene”, and “colorectal cancer” AND “lignan” from the reputed peer-reviewed journals published over the last 20 years. Publications that incorporated in vivo experimental designs and produced statistically significant results were considered for this review. Many of these polyphenols demonstrate anti-CRC activities by inhibiting key cellular factors. This inhibition has been demonstrated by antiapoptotic effects, antiproliferative effects, or by upregulating factors responsible for cell cycle arrest or cell death in various in vivo CRC models. Numerous studies from independent laboratories have highlighted different plant phenolic compounds for their anti-CRC activities. While promising anti-CRC activity in many of these agents has created interest in this area, in-depth mechanistic and well-designed clinical studies are needed to support the therapeutic use of these compounds for the prevention and treatment of CRC.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in men worldwide. A geographic variation on the burden of the disease suggested that the environment, genetic makeup, lifestyle, and food habits modulate one's susceptibility to the disease. Although it has been generally thought to be an older age disease, and awareness and timely execution of screening programs have managed to contain the disease in the older population over the last decades, the incidence is still increasing in the population younger than 50. Existing treatment is efficient for PCa that is localized and responsive to androgen. However, the androgen resistant and metastatic PCa are challenging to treat. Conventional radiation and chemotherapies are associated with severe side effects in addition to being exorbitantly expensive. Many isolated phytochemicals and extracts of plants used in traditional medicine are known for their safety and diverse healing properties, including many with varying levels of anti-PCa activities. Many of the phytochemicals discussed here, as shown by many laboratories, inhibit tumor cell growth and proliferation by interfering with the components in the pathways responsible for the enhanced proliferation, metabolism, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis in the prostate cells while upregulating the mechanisms of cell death and cell cycle arrest. Notably, many of these agents simultaneously target multiple cellular pathways. We analyzed the available literature and provided an update on this issue in this review article.

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a unique landscape that poses several physical, biochemical, and immune barriers to anti-cancer therapies. The rapidly evolving field of immuno-engineering provides new opportunities to dismantle the tumor immune microenvironment by efficient tumor destruction. Systemic delivery of such treatments can often have limited local effects, leading to unwanted offsite effects such as systemic toxicity and tumor resistance. Interventional radiologists use contemporary image-guided techniques to locally deliver these therapies to modulate the immunosuppressive TME, further accelerating tumor death and invoking a better anti-tumor response. These involve local therapies such as intratumoral drug delivery, nanorobots, nanoparticles, and implantable microdevices. Physical therapies such as photodynamic therapy, electroporation, hyperthermia, hypothermia, ultrasound therapy, histotripsy, and radiotherapy are also available for local tumor destruction. While the interventional radiologist can only locally manipulate the TME, there are systemic offsite recruitments of the immune response. This is known as the abscopal effect, which leads to more significant anti-tumoral downstream effects. Local delivery of modern immunoengineering methods such as locoregional CAR-T therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors efficaciously modulates the immunosuppressive TME. This review highlights the various advances and technologies available now to change the TME and revolutionize oncology from a minimally invasive viewpoint.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical success, effectiveness, and safety of transarterial embolization for acute bleeding management with a shear-thinning conformable embolic. This single-center retrospective study evaluated outcomes following embolization using Obsidio(OCE). Technical success was defined as performing transarterial embolization within the target vessel to complete stasis of antegrade flow. Treatment effectiveness was defined as cessation of bleeding for patients. 11 patients underwent 11 embolization procedures. A total of 16 arteries were embolized. Indications for embolization were spontaneous tumor bleeding (6/11), hematuria (2/11), active duodenal bleeding (1/11), portal hypertensive bleeding (1/11), and rectus sheath hematoma (1/11). Technical success was 100%. The median vessel diameter was 2 mm (range 1-3). There were no adverse events as per SIR adverse event criteria or off-target embolization. OCE demonstrated technical success and treatment effectiveness with a short-term safety profile for transarterial embolization interventions.

Image-guided therapies (IGTs) are commonly used in oncology, but their role in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is not well defined. A retrospective review of patients with ACC treated with IGTs. We assessed response to therapy using RECIST v1.1, time to next line of systemic therapy, disease control rate (DCR), local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS), and complications of IGTs (based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version 5.0). Our cohort included 26 patients (median age 56 years [range 38-76]; n = 18 female) who had 51 IGT sessions to treat 86 lesions. IGTs modalities included cryoablation (n = 49), microwave ablation (n = 21), combined microwave and bland trans-arterial embolization (n = 8), bland trans-arterial embolization alone (n = 3), radio-embolization (n = 3), and radiofrequency ablation (n = 2). DCR was 81.4% (70 out of 86), of which 66.3% of tumors showed complete response, 18.6% showed progressive disease, 8.1% showed partial response, and 7.0% showed stable disease. LTPFS rates were 73% and 63% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Fourteen lesions underwent re-ablation for incomplete response on initial treatment. Sixteen patients (61.5%) received new systemic therapy following IGTs, with a median time to systemic therapy of 12.5 months (95% CI: 8.6 months upper limit not reached). There was 1 reported CTCAE grade 3 adverse event (biloma) following IGT. IGT use in properly selected patients with ACC is safe and associated with prolonged disease control and delay in the need for systemic therapy.