Hyo Soon Lim

Hyo Soon Lim


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Korean Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJin Wang Park
Jin Wang Park
WJWon Gi Jeong
Won Gi Jeong
JLJong Eun Lee
Jong Eun Lee
HLHyo-Jae Lee
Hyo-Jae Lee
SKSo Yeon Ki
So Yeon Ki
YKYun-hyeon Kim
Yun-hyeon Kim
Park JW, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2021 Jan;22(1):139-154. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0897

3 April 2017 in Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HLHyo Soon Lim
Hyo Soon Lim
SKShin Jung Kim
Shin Jung Kim
JBJang Mi Baek
Jang Mi Baek
JKJin Woong Kim
Jin Woong Kim
SSSang Soo Shin
Sang Soo Shin
SHSuk Hee Heo
Suk Hee Heo

1 August 2017 in British Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SOSeung Won Oh
Seung Won Oh
HLHyo Soon Lim
Hyo Soon Lim
SMSung Min Moon
Sung Min Moon
JKJin Woong Kim
Jin Woong Kim
SSSang Soo Shin
Sang Soo Shin
MPMin Ho Park
Min Ho Park
Objectives: To describe the MR imaging characteristics of breast cancer diagnosed during lactation and evaluate the usefulness of MR imaging. Methods: The MR images of nine patients (age range, 29–37 years) with pathologically confirmed breast carcinoma during lactation were evaluated retrospectively. Background parenchymal enhancement of the lactating mammary tissue was determined. The images were reviewed for evaluation of lesion detection, enhancement type (mass/non-mass), shape, margin, contrast enhancement and time–intensity curve pattern in the dynamic study. The breast MR images after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were also reviewed. Results: Although the breasts showed marked (n = 7) or moderate (n = 2) background parenchymal enhancement, MR imaging depicted breast cancer in all patients. All nine tumours were visible as masses. The most common shape and margin of the masses were an irregular mass (n = 5) with an irregular margin (n = 9). Contrast enhancement was heterogeneous or rim enhancement. The predominant kinetic pattern was rapid increase (n = 9) in the initial phase and washout (n = 5) in the delayed phase. Additional sites of cancer other than the index lesion were detected with MR imaging in three patients (33.3%). MR imaging demonstrated partial response in five of six patients who were evaluated for response to chemotherapy. Conclusion: All breast cancers in lactating females in this study were observed on breast MR imaging despite the moderate-to-marked background parenchymal enhancement of lactating mammary tissue. Advances in knowledge: MR imaging can be used in the evaluation of disease extent and assessment of therapeutic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer diagnosed during lactation.

17 September 2024 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HLHyo-Jae Lee
Hyo-Jae Lee
JLJeong Hoon Lee
Jeong Hoon Lee
JLJong Eun Lee
Jong Eun Lee
YNYong Min Na
Yong Min Na
MPMin Ho Park
Min Ho Park
HLHyo Soon Lim
Hyo Soon Lim
This study assessed pretreatment breast MRI coupled with machine learning for predicting early clinical responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), focusing on identifying non-responders. A retrospective analysis of 135 TNBC patients (107 responders, 28 non-responders) treated with NAC from January 2015 to October 2022 was conducted. Non-responders were defined according to RECIST guidelines. Data included clinicopathologic factors and clinical MRI findings, with radiomics features from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, to train a stacking ensemble of 13 machine learning models. For subgroup analysis, propensity score matching was conducted to adjust for clinical disparities in NAC response. The efficacy of the models was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC) before and after matching. The model combining clinicopathologic factors and clinical MRI findings achieved an AUROC of 0.752 (95% CI 0.644–0.860) for predicting non-responders, while radiomics-based models showed 0.749 (95% CI 0.614–0.884). An integrated model of radiomics, clinicopathologic factors, and clinical MRI findings reached an AUROC of 0.802 (95% CI 0.699–0.905). After propensity score matching, the hierarchical order of key radiomics features remained consistent. Our study demonstrated the potential of using machine learning models based on pretreatment MRI to non-invasively predict TNBC non-responders to NAC.

2 December 2021 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HLHyo-Jae Lee
Hyo-Jae Lee
ANAnh-Tien Nguyen
Anh-Tien Nguyen
SKSo Yeon Ki
So Yeon Ki
JLJong Eun Lee
Jong Eun Lee
LDLuu-Ngoc Do
Luu-Ngoc Do
HLHyo Soon Lim
Hyo Soon Lim
Objective: This study was conducted in order to investigate the feasibility of using radiomics analysis (RA) with machine learning algorithms based on breast magnetic resonance (MR) images for discriminating malignant from benign MR-detected additional lesions in patients with primary breast cancer.Materials and Methods: One hundred seventy-four MR-detected additional lesions (benign, n = 86; malignancy, n = 88) from 158 patients with ipsilateral primary breast cancer from a tertiary medical center were included in this retrospective study. The entire data were randomly split to training (80%) and independent test sets (20%). In addition, 25 patients (benign, n = 21; malignancy, n = 15) from another tertiary medical center were included for the external test. Radiomics features that were extracted from three regions-of-interest (ROIs; intratumor, peritumor, combined) using fat-saturated T1-weighted images obtained by subtracting pre- from postcontrast images (SUB) and T2-weighted image (T2) were utilized to train the support vector machine for the binary classification. A decision tree method was utilized to build a classifier model using clinical imaging interpretation (CII) features assessed by radiologists. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to compare the diagnostic performance.Results: The RA models trained using radiomics features from the intratumor-ROI showed comparable performance to the CII model (accuracy, AUROC: 73.3%, 69.6% for the SUB RA model; 70.0%, 75.1% for the T2 RA model; 73.3%, 72.0% for the CII model). The diagnostic performance increased when the radiomics and CII features were combined to build a fusion model. The fusion model that combines the CII features and radiomics features from multiparametric MRI data demonstrated the highest performance with an accuracy of 86.7% and an AUROC of 91.1%. The external test showed a similar pattern where the fusion models demonstrated higher levels of performance compared with the RA- or CII-only models. The accuracy and AUROC of the SUB+T2 RA+CII model in the external test were 80.6% and 91.4%, respectively.Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the feasibility of using RA with machine learning approach based on multiparametric MRI for quantitatively characterizing MR-detected additional lesions. The fusion model demonstrated an improved diagnostic performance over the models trained with either RA or CII alone.

2 November 2022 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HLHyo-Jae Lee
Hyo-Jae Lee
JPJae Hyeok Park
Jae Hyeok Park
ANAnh-Tien Nguyen
Anh-Tien Nguyen
LDLuu-Ngoc Do
Luu-Ngoc Do
MPMin Ho Park
Min Ho Park
HLHyo Soon Lim
Hyo Soon Lim
Objective: To investigate whether support vector machine (SVM) trained with radiomics features based on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could predict the upgrade of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed by core needle biopsy (CNB) after surgical excision.Materials and methods: This retrospective study included a total of 349 lesions from 346 female patients (mean age, 54 years) diagnosed with DCIS by CNB between January 2011 and December 2017. Based on histological confirmation after surgery, the patients were divided into pure (n = 198, 56.7%) and upgraded DCIS (n = 151, 43.3%). The entire dataset was randomly split to training (80%) and test sets (20%). Radiomics features were extracted from the intratumor region-of-interest, which was semi-automatically drawn by two radiologists, based on the first subtraction images from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used for feature selection. A 4-fold cross validation was applied to the training set to determine the combination of features used to train SVM for classification between pure and upgraded DCIS. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the model performance using the hold-out test set.Results: The model trained with 9 features (Energy, Skewness, Surface Area to Volume ratio, Gray Level Non Uniformity, Kurtosis, Dependence Variance, Maximum 2D diameter Column, Sphericity, and Large Area Emphasis) demonstrated the highest 4-fold mean validation accuracy and AUC of 0.724 (95% CI, 0.619–0.829) and 0.742 (0.623–0.860), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC using the test set were 0.733 (0.575–0.892) and 0.7 (0.558–0.842), 0.714 (0.608–0.820) and 0.767 (0.651–0.882), respectively.Conclusion: Our study suggested that the combined radiomics and machine learning approach based on preoperative breast MRI may provide an assisting tool to predict the histologic upgrade of DCIS.