Angiogenesis is a physiological process that consists of the formation of new blood vessels from preexisting ones. Angiogenesis helps in growth, development, and wound healing through the formation of granulation tissue. However, this physiological process has also been linked to tumor growth and metastasis formation. Indeed, angiogenesis has to be considered as a fundamental step to the evolution of benign tumors into malignant neoplasms. The main mediator of angiogenesis is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is overexpressed in certain cancers. Thus, there are anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies, such as bevacizumab, used as anti-cancer therapies. However, bevacizumab has shown adverse events, such as hypertension and proteinuria, which in the most severe cases can lead to cessation of therapy, thus contributing to worsening patients’ prognosis. On the other hand, endostatin is an endogenous protein that strongly inhibits VEGF expression and angiogenesis and shows a better safety profile. Moreover, endostatin has already given promising results on small scale clinical studies. Hence, in this review, we present data supporting the use of endostatin as a replacement for anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies.

Septic shock currently represents one of the main causes of mortality in critical patient units with an increase in its incidence in recent years, and it is also associated with a high burden of morbidity in surviving patients. Within the pathogenesis of sepsis, oxidative stress plays an important role. The excessive formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) leads to mitochondrial damage and vasomotor dysfunction that characterizes those patients who fall into septic shock. Currently, despite numerous studies carried out in patients with septic shock of different causes, effective therapies have not yet been developed to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with this pathology. Despite the contribution of ROS in the pathophysiology of sepsis and septic shock, most studies performed in humans, with antioxidant monotherapies, have not resulted in promising data. Nevertheless, some interventions with compounds such as ascorbate, N-acetylcysteine, and selenium would have a positive effect in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with this pathology. However, more studies are required to demonstrate the efficacy of these therapies. Taking into account the multifactorial features of the pathophysiology of sepsis, we put forward the hypothesis that a supplementation based on the association of more than one antioxidant compound should result in a synergistic or additive effect, thus improving the beneficial effects of each of them alone, potentially serving as a pharmacological adjunct resource to standard therapy to reduce sepsis complications. Therefore, in this review, it is proposed that the use of combined antioxidant therapies could lead to a better clinical outcome of patients with sepsis or septic shock, given the relevance of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of this multi-organ dysfunction.

Ischemia/reperfusion injury is a process associated with cardiologic interventions, such as percutaneous coronary angioplasty after an acute myocardial infarction. Blood flow restoration causes a quick burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which generates multiple organelle damage, leading to the activation of cell death pathways. Therefore, the intervention contributes to a greater necrotic zone, thus increasing the risk of cardiovascular complications. A major cardiovascular ROS source in this setting is the activation of multiple NADPH oxidases, which could result via the occupancy of type 1 angiotensin II receptors (AT1R); hence, the renin angiotensin system (RAS) is associated with the generation of ROS during reperfusion. In addition, ROS can promote the expression of NF-κΒ, a proinflammatory transcription factor. Recent studies have described an intracellular RAS pathway that is associated with increased intramitochondrial ROS through the action of isoform NOX4 of NADPH oxidase, thereby contributing to mitochondrial dysfunction. On the other hand, the angiotensin II/ angiotensin type 2 receptor (Ang II/AT2R) axis exerts its effects by counter-modulating the action of AT1R, by activating endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and stimulating cardioprotective pathways such as akt. The aim of this review is to discuss the possible use of AT1R blockers to hamper both the Ang II/AT1R axis and the associated ROS burst. Moreover; we suggest that AT1R antagonist drugs should act synergistically with other cardioprotective agents, such as ascorbic acid, N-acetylcysteine and deferoxamine, leading to an enhanced reduction in the reperfusion injury. This therapy is currently being tested in our laboratory and has shown promising outcomes in experimental studies.

Breast cancer is the most frequent malignant neoplastic disease in women, with an estimated 2.3 million cases in 2020 worldwide. Its treatment depends on characteristics of the patient and the tumor. In the latter, characteristics include cell type and morphology, anatomical location, and immunophenotype. Concerning this latter aspect, the overexpression of the HER2 receptor, expressed in 15–25% of tumors, is associated with greater aggressiveness and worse prognosis. In recent times some monoclonal antibodies have been developed in order to target HER2 receptor overexpression. Trastuzumab is part of the monoclonal antibodies used as targeted therapy against HER2 receptor, whose major problem is its cardiac safety profile, where it has been associated with cardiotoxicity. The appearance of cardiotoxicity is an indication to stop therapy. Although the pathophysiological mechanism is poorly known, evidence indicates that oxidative stress plays a fundamental role causing DNA damage, increased cytosolic and mitochondrial ROS production, changes in mitochondrial membrane potential, intracellular calcium dysregulation, and the consequent cell death through different pathways. The aim of this review was to explore the use of antioxidants as adjuvant therapy to trastuzumab to prevent its cardiac toxicity, thus leading to ameliorate its safety profile in its administration.

Background/Objectives: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT), involving subcutaneous (SCIT) or sublingual (SLIT) administration of the culprit allergen, is the only treatment capable of modifying the natural course of allergic diseases, and provides lasting benefits in terms of symptom reduction and medication use. AIT for allergic rhinitis is acknowledged as safe and effective in both adults and children; however, no studies have comprehensively evaluated the safety and efficacy of AIT in these populations, integrating results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence (RWE). Methods: We evaluated data in the literature including studies from RCTs and RWE in which the safety and efficacy of AIT in both children and adults have been analyzed. A narrative literature search was conducted in PubMed up to January 2026 using the following keywords for the search string: “allergen immunotherapy,” “AIT,” “safety,” “efficacy,” “clinical outcome,” and “clinical evaluation.” Results: RCTs and meta-analyses showed that both SCIT and SLIT significantly reduced allergic symptoms and medication use and improved quality of life (QoL). Large SLIT tablet trials have confirmed its efficacy in adults and children, whereas RWE supports its effectiveness in broader populations. Safety data indicated that SCIT carries a small but higher risk of systemic reactions than SLIT, which mainly causes mild local effects. Conclusions: AIT was effective and safe for treating allergic rhinitis across RCT and RWE studies. Integrating RWE with RCT findings is essential for guideline development, particularly for capturing long-term outcomes and real-world applications.

The anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination has probably been the most effective tool for preventing the infection and negative outcomes of the COVID-19 disease, and therefore for interrupting the pandemic state. The first licensed SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was BNT162b2, an mRNA vaccine that has been widely used since the earliest stages of the global vaccination campaign. Since the beginning of the vaccination campaign, some cases of suspected allergic reactions to BNT162b2 have been described. Epidemiological data, however, have provided reassuring results of an extremely low prevalence of these hypersensitivity reactions to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. In this article, we describe the results of a survey carried out through the use of a questionnaire, administered to all the health personnel of our university hospital after the first two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine, which investigated the development of adverse reactions after a vaccination. We analyzed the responses of 3112 subjects subjected to the first dose of the vaccine; among these, 1.8% developed symptoms compatible with allergic reactions and 0.9% with clinical manifestations of possible anaphylaxis. Only 10.3% of the subjects who had allergic reactions after the first injection experienced similar reactions after the second dose and none of them experienced anaphylaxis. In conclusion, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is rarely associated with severe allergic reactions and the second dose of vaccine is safe for this group of patients.