David Timothy Axford

Mr. David Timothy Axford


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DADavid Timothy Axford
David Timothy Axford
RPRobert Potra
Robert Potra
RARichard Appleyard
Richard Appleyard
JTJanos Tomka
Janos Tomka
AAAntonio Arenas-Miquelez
Antonio Arenas-Miquelez
SRSumit Raniga
Sumit Raniga
Ex vivo shoulder motion simulators are commonly used to study shoulder biomechanics but are often limited to performing simple planar motions at quasi-static speeds using control architectures that do not allow muscles to be deactivated. The purpose of this study was to develop an open-loop tendon excursion controller with iterative learning and independent muscle control to simulate complex multiplanar motion at functional speeds and allow for muscle deactivation. The simulator performed abduction/adduction, faceted circumduction, and abduction/adduction (subscapularis deactivation) using a cadaveric shoulder with an implanted reverse total shoulder prosthesis. Kinematic tracking accuracy and repeatability were assessed using maximum absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and average standard deviation (ASD). During abduction/adduction and faceted circumduction, the RMSE did not exceed 0.3, 0.7, and 0.8 degrees for elevation, plane of elevation, and axial rotation, respectively. During abduction/adduction, the ASD did not exceed 0.2 degrees. Abduction/adduction (subscapularis deactivation) resulted in a loss of internal rotation, which could not be restored at low elevation angles. This study presents a novel control architecture, which can accurately simulate complex glenohumeral motion. This simulator will be used as a testing platform to examine the effect of shoulder pathology, treatment, and rehabilitation on joint biomechanics during functional shoulder movements.

1 July 2019 in Clinical Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABArmin Badre
Armin Badre
DADavid Timothy Axford
David Timothy Axford
SBSara Banayan
Sara Banayan
JJJames A. Johnson
James A. Johnson
GKGraham J.W. King
Graham J.W. King

17 February 2025 in Journal of Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DADavid Timothy Axford
David Timothy Axford
RPRobert Potra
Robert Potra
RARichard Appleyard
Richard Appleyard
JTJanos Tomka
Janos Tomka
AAAntonio Arenas-Miquelez
Antonio Arenas-Miquelez
LFLouis Ferreira
Louis Ferreira
While several biomechanical investigations have measured acromion and scapular spine strains for various pathological conditions to better understand the risk factors for fracture, no study has measured strains in the native shoulder. The objective of this study was to use an ex-vivo shoulder motion simulator to measure principal strain during continuous, unconstrained, muscle-driven motion of the native shoulder. Eight cadaveric specimens (57 ± 6 years) were used to simulate scapular plane abduction (27.5 to 80° of humerothoracic elevation), forward flexion (27.5 to 72.5° of humerothoracic elevation), external rotation (0 to 40° of external rotation), and circumduction (elliptical path) with glenohumeral rotation speeds of 10°/s. Principal strain was measured throughout motion in four clinically relevant regions of the scapular spine and acromion according to the Levy classification using tri-axial strain gauge rosettes. Increases in humeral elevation during scapular plane abduction and forward flexion were associated with increases in deltoid force and scapula strain. However, above approximately 60° of humerothoracic elevation, strains plateaued while deltoid forces continued to increase indicating that scapula strain patterns are influenced by deltoid force magnitude and direction. Scapula strain was higher during scapular plane abduction than forward flexion in all regions but was only significantly higher in Levy 3B (p = 0.038). The highest strains were observed in Levy regions 2 and 3A (p ≤ 0.01) which correspond to regions with the highest clinically observed fracture rates demonstrating that the shape of the acromion and scapular spine may influence strain distribution irrespective of the joint condition.