The DLR project VicToria brings together disciplinary methods and tools of different fidelity for collaborative multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) of long-range passenger aircraft configurations, necessitating the use of high-performance computing. Three different approaches are being followed to master complex interactions of disciplines and software aspects: an integrated aero-structural wing optimization based on high-fidelity methods, a multi-fidelity gradient-based approach capable of efficiently dealing with many design parameters and many load cases, and a many-discipline highly-parallel approach, which is a novel approach towards computationally demanding and collaboration intensive MDO. The XRF-1, an Airbus provided research aircraft configuration representing a typical long-range wide-body aircraft, is used as a common test case to demonstrate the different MDO strategies. Additional results are presented for the NASA Common Research Model (CRM) to show their flexibility. Parametric disciplinary models are used in terms of overall aircraft design synthesis, loads analysis, flutter, structural analysis and optimization, engine design, and aircraft performance. The different MDO strategies are shown to be effective in dealing with complex, real-world MDO problems in a highly collaborative, cross-institutional design environment, involving many disciplinary groups and experts and a mix of commercial and in-house design and analysis software.

For the evaluation of future aircraft architectures or novel technologies, a well-understood and sound reference to compare to is essential to prove the impact of intended changes. A reference aircraft serves as a basis for calibration of the aircraft and is used as a starting point for subsequent investigations, sensitivity studies or optimizations. The prime need for such a reference arose from the European Clean-Sky-2 project HLFC-Win (Hybrid Laminar Flow Control—Wing), where no industrial reference data for a conventional aircraft were available. The project investigates a HLFC system integrated into the wing aiming to reduce the wing drag and consequently reducing the fuel consumption. Therefore, this paper presents the D300-XRF1 designed by DLR, which is based on the AIRBUS research aircraft XRF1 (eXternal Research Forum). It is intended to be used as a reference aircraft database representing aircraft for medium- and long-range missions. A variable fidelity multidisciplinary design analysis and optimization (MDAO) aircraft design environment is set up to provide a consistent estimate of the geometry, mass breakdown, propulsion system, aerodynamics and aircraft performance. A conceptual aircraft design tool is utilized in the aircraft design environment to initialize the process, and higher-fidelity modules are used to enhance the results. The presented results describe the overall aircraft characteristics of the D300-XRF1 based on 2010 entry into service technology level and is offered to be used as a reference within the aviation research community, hopefully reducing similar design efforts in other research projects.The aircraft operates at a design cruise Mach number of 0.83, has a design range of 5500 NM and transports a payload of 31.5 t (300 PAX at 105 kg/PAX). The D300-XRF1 serves as a consistent reference aircraft database and provides a holistic overview of the aircraft’s performance that has been presented to and approved by AIRBUS. Therefore, this reference aircraft design can be used for future studies and to assess new technologies on a sophisticated level.

The energy efficiency of emerging aircraft designs plays a key role, not only in reducing environmental impact, but also in reducing operating costs in the anticipated rise in fuel prices. The European Clean Sky 2 project HLFC-Win is investigating the feasibility of hybrid laminar flow control (HLFC) technology integrated into the outer wing leading edge for a long-haul aircraft. HLFC technology reduces aerodynamic friction drag by means of suction of the boundary layer through a micro-perforated skin to achieve laminarity and thereby improving aircraft performance. However, integrating such a system is not without its drawbacks, as the integration has an impact on the geometry, mass, aerodynamics and engine offtakes that need to be considered. Therefore, the aim of this current work is to assess the HLFC system based on a fair, objective and transparent comparison between the HLFC aircraft and an aircraft of the same technology level without HLFC. The assessment of the HLFC system is twofold, firstly estimating the mission-based performance at the overall aircraft level and secondly performing a lifecycle simulation with three scenarios to determine realistic fuel and cost savings. The mission-based performance assessment indicates a block fuel reduction of over 3 % for the design mission which averages 1.6 to 2.5 % considering a realistic route scenario and expected degradation. The economic assessment suggests a dependency on the scenario chosen, ranging from a 0.7 % increase in total cost (in an unfavourable scenario) to almost a 1 % reduction in total cost (in a favourable scenario), equivalent to $15 million saved per HLFC aircraft over its lifetime. These results support the commercial viability of HLFC technology, which offers significant aerodynamic and fuel efficiency improvements and operating cost savings to the aviation industry. Importantly, no critical barriers were identified for the integration of HLFC technology, further underscoring its potential to improve aircraft performance.

Improving fuel efficiency is a primary challenge in modern aviation, with aerodynamics serving as a key enabler. Aerodynamic friction drag accounts for more than 50% of total drag, highlighting a significant opportunity for efficiency gains through laminar flow, which reduces skin friction drag. In addition, increasing the wing aspect ratio while maintaining a constant lift coefficient to achieve maximum lift-to-drag ratio can further improve aerodynamic performance. However, evaluating laminar flow in isolation, without considering overall mass, system power requirements, or engine performance, can lead to an incomplete assessment of its true technological potential. In this study, a conceptual design methodology was applied to integrate laminar-flow technologies (natural and hybrid) across the wing, empennage, nacelle, and fuselage of a 2035 long-haul reference aircraft. Results indicate a potential for 16% block fuel reduction at the aircraft level, with wing aspect-ratio tailoring delivering up to 24% fuel savings. These findings will be refined through detailed disciplinary analyses in future work.

The aviation industry is under increasing pressure to enhance sustainability by improving energy efficiency and reducing climate impact. A promising approach is to reduce aerodynamic drag using laminar flow technologies, particularly Natural Laminar Flow (NLF) and Hybrid Laminar Flow Control (HLFC). Previous research has primarily focused on aerodynamic performance, often considering only one technology at a time, using simplified HLFC system design models, and targeting long-range aircraft. This study adopts a more holistic approach by conducting a conceptual design of a short-medium range (SMR) aircraft equipped with both NLF and HLFC. The technologies are applied to the wing and empennage, with detailed HLFC system modelling integrated into the conceptual design process using established methods. A failure analysis is also performed to assess the performance impact of potential malfunctions. Results indicate that combining NLF and HLFC can reduce fuel consumption by 5.9% on the design mission compared to a fully turbulent reference aircraft. Moreover, selectively applying the technologies to specific components enhances fuel savings while reducing system complexity. These findings demonstrate the potential of laminar flow technologies to improve fuel efficiency in SMR aircraft and highlight the importance of integrated aerodynamic and systems-level evaluation.