Wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) are considered to be a point source of microplastic (particles <5 mm) for riverine environments. However, data on microplastic effluent concentrations in WWTPs is collected with a broad range of methods, which impede comparisons across data sets. We provide an estimate of the annual emissions of microplastic particles by WWTPs into the ten major river basins of Germany. We analyze the concentration patterns of microplastics among different stream orders resulting from the spatial organization of WWTPs along the river network. The local in-stream microplastic concentrations are estimated through a network model that accounts for routing of microplastics through the entire fluvial network under the assumption of no losses by sedimentation, entanglement or degradation. Previous studies have observed microplastic concentrations in treated WWTPs effluents ranging several orders of magnitude. In 19 studies reviewed (2016-2020), the concentrations of observed microplastic concentrations (size range between 10 and 5000 μm) in 79 WWTP effluents ranged between 4 ∗ 10⁰ and 4.5 ∗ 10⁵ items/m³ with a median of around 6400 items/m³. The total, median microplastic load emitted by WWTPs in Germany is 7 ∗ 10¹² items/year. The simulated microplastic concentrations, on average, tend to increase with increasing stream order suggesting that the WWTP effluent fraction accumulates with a higher rate than discharge. Simulated WWTP-derived in-stream concentrations are higher than observed concentrations with all sources of microplastic, not only those from WWTPs. Observed microplastic concentrations in rivers as well as the considerably higher simulated, WWTP-derived microplastic concentration, even for low flow conditions, are approximately one order of magnitude below currently known toxic effect levels.

There is increasing awareness that chemical pollution of freshwater systems with complex mixtures of chemicals from domestic sources, agriculture and industry may cause a substantial chemical footprint on water organisms, pushing aquatic ecosystems outside the safe operating space. The present study defines chemical footprints as the risk that chemicals or chemical mixtures will have adverse effects on a specific group of organisms. The aim is to characterise these chemical footprints in European streams based on a unique and uniform screening of more than 600 chemicals in 445 surface water samples, and to derive site- and compound-specific information for management prioritisation purposes. In total, 504 pesticides, biocides, pharmaceuticals and other compounds have been detected, including frequently occurring and site-specific compounds with concentrations up to 74 µg/L. Key finding is that three-quarter of the investigated sites in 22 European river basins exceed established thresholds for chemical footprints in freshwater, leading to expected acute or chronic impacts on aquatic organisms. The largest footprints were recorded on invertebrates, followed by algae and fish. More than 70 chemicals exceed thresholds of chronic impacts on invertebrates. For all organism groups, pesticides and biocides were the main drivers of chemical footprints, while mixture impacts were particularly relevant for invertebrates. No clear significant correlation was found between chemical footprints and the urban discharge fractions, suggesting that effluent-specific quality rather than the total load of treated wastewater in the aquatic environment and the contribution of diffuse sources, e.g. from agriculture, determine chemical footprints.

There is significant debate about why less than half of European rivers and streams are in good ecological status, despite decades of intense regulatory efforts. Of the multiple stressors that are recognized as potential contributors to stream degradation, we focus on discharge from 26,500 European wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). We tested the hypothesis that stream ecological status degradation across Europe is related to the local intensity of wastewater discharge, with an expected stream-order (ω) dependence based on the scaling laws that govern receiving stream networks. We found that ecological status in streams (ω≤3) declined consistently with increasing urban wastewater discharge fraction of stream flow (UDF) across river types and basins. In contrast, ecological status in larger rivers (ω≥4) was not related to UDF. From a continental-scale logistic regression model (accuracy 86%) we identified an ecologically critical threshold UDF = 6.5% ± 0.5. This is exceeded by more than one third of WWTPs in Europe, mostly discharging into smaller streams. Our results suggest that new receiving water-specific strategies for wastewater management are needed to achieve good ecological status in smaller streams.