Yu Jin

Prof. Dr. Yu Jin

Institute for Energy Research, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2021 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Hongliang LuoHongliang Luo
Hongliang Luo
FCFeixiang Chang
Feixiang Chang
Yu JinYu Jin
Yu Jin
YOYoichi Ogata
Yoichi Ogata
YMYukihiko Matsumura
Yukihiko Matsumura
KNKeiya Nishida
Keiya Nishida

1 May 2025 in Physics of Fluids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SXShuohan Xu
Shuohan Xu
GGGenmiao Guo
Genmiao Guo
KYKang Yang
Kang Yang
JYJianping Yuan
Jianping Yuan
WGWei Guan
Wei Guan
Zhi-xia HeZhi-xia He
Zhi-xia He
To assess the prediction accuracy of existing cavitation models for in-nozzle string cavitation, elucidate the accumulation characteristics of the vortex flow field on the bubbles, and explore the influence of non-condensable gas in the string cavitation inception and development, a modified cavitation model has been proposed. This modified model is expected to be more precise in predicting string cavitation. In this paper, numerical simulations are carried out in conjunction with visualization experiments, where discrete-phase particles represent the non-condensable gas. Results indicate that the current Zwart–Gerber–Belamri cavitation model fails to account for the effect of the non-condensable gas factor in the modeling process, leading to inaccurate predictions of string cavitation within the nozzle. To address this issue, modification of the mass source term of the cavitation model is proposed based on the Rayleigh–Plesset equation and the bubble surface pressure equation. The modified model demonstrates better accuracy in predicting string cavitation inside the nozzle. The gas nuclei inside the fuel tend to accumulate around the vortex core, influenced by the internal vortex flow field, which further contributes to the string cavitation inception and development. This study proposed and evaluated a more accurate cavitation model and further improved the cavitation initiation and development mechanism.

1 January 2021 in Fuel
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Hongliang LuoHongliang Luo
Hongliang Luo
Yu JinYu Jin
Yu Jin
KNKeiya Nishida
Keiya Nishida
YOYouichi Ogata
Youichi Ogata
JYJing Yao
Jing Yao
RCRun Chen
Run Chen

12 December 2025 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XLXianyin Leng
Xianyin Leng
LDLijie Ding
Lijie Ding
QWQing Wu
Qing Wu
ZLZhengwei Luo
Zhengwei Luo
XLXinming Li
Xinming Li
QWQian Wang
Qian Wang

4 May 2020 in Energy & Fuels
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Yu JinYu Jin
Yu Jin
PDPengbo Dong
Pengbo Dong
CZChang Zhai
Chang Zhai
KNKeiya Nishida
Keiya Nishida
YOYoichi Ogata
Yoichi Ogata
XLXianyin Leng
Xianyin Leng

14 August 2024 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Chang ZHAIChang ZHAI
Chang ZHAI
KLKuichun Li
Kuichun Li
Pengbo DongPengbo Dong
Pengbo Dong
Yu JinYu Jin
Yu Jin
Hongliang LuoHongliang Luo
Hongliang Luo
YLYang Liu
Yang Liu
This investigation employed the diffused back-illumination (DBI) technique to analyze the spray characteristics of hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) fuel at three injection pressures and compared them with conventional diesel fuel. The results showed that as the injection pressure increased, the peak injection rates of both the HVO and diesel increased. At injection pressures above 120 MPa, the injection rates of both fuels were nearly identical, though differences were observed at lower pressures. Increasing the injection pressure reduced the injection delay. The HVO fuel exhibited a shorter spray tip penetration, lower equivalence ratio, larger spray angle, and spray volume, but its spray angle stability was lower than that of diesel. The ambient gas entrainment rate primarily occurred in two stages, significantly influenced by the spray breakup development stage. For diesel sprays, the injection pressure mainly affected the equivalence ratio near the nozzle with minimal downstream impact. Dent’s model provided better predictions of the penetration distance for diesel, while Hiroyasu’s model was more accurate in predicting the penetration distance of the HVO at 120 MPa and 180 MPa. Inagaki’s model performed better in predicting the spray angle for diesel, whereas Hiroyasu’s model was more accurate for the HVO spray angle predictions. Through this research, a better understanding of the spray characteristics of green fuels will be achieved, providing a reference for the design and optimization of new generation engines.