Savvas Nesseris

Dr. Savvas Nesseris

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 April 2025 in Astronomy & Astrophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECEuclid Collaboration
Euclid Collaboration
YMY. Mellier
Y. Mellier
AFAbdurro’u F
Abdurro’u F
JBJ. A. Acevedo Barroso
J. A. Acevedo Barroso
AAA. Achúcarro
A. Achúcarro
LLLler Ller
Ller Ller
The current standard model of cosmology successfully describes a variety of measurements, but the nature of its main ingredients, dark matter and dark energy, remains unknown. Euclid is a medium-class mission in the Cosmic Vision 2015–2025 programme of the European Space Agency (ESA) that will provide high-resolution optical imaging, as well as near-infrared imaging and spectroscopy, over about 14 000 deg2 of extragalactic sky. In addition to accurate weak lensing and clustering measurements that probe structure formation over half of the age of the Universe, its primary probes for cosmology, these exquisite data will enable a wide range of science. This paper provides a high-level overview of the mission, summarising the survey characteristics, the various data-processing steps, and data products. We also highlight the main science objectives and expected performance.

28 July 2023 in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RAR. Abbott
R. Abbott
HAH. Abe
H. Abe
FAF. Acernese
F. Acernese
KAKendall Ackley
Kendall Ackley
SAS. Adhicary
S. Adhicary
JZJ. Zweizig
J. Zweizig
The global network of gravitational-wave observatories now includes five detectors, namely LIGO Hanford, LIGO Livingston, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO 600. These detectors collected data during their third observing run, O3, composed of three phases: O3a starting in 2019 April and lasting six months, O3b starting in 2019 November and lasting five months, and O3GK starting in 2020 April and lasting two weeks. In this paper we describe these data and various other science products that can be freely accessed through the Gravitational Wave Open Science Center at https://gwosc.org. The main data set, consisting of the gravitational-wave strain time series that contains the astrophysical signals, is released together with supporting data useful for their analysis and documentation, tutorials, as well as analysis software packages.

31 July 2017 in Physical Review D
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SNSavvas Nesseris
Savvas Nesseris
GPGeorge Pantazis
George Pantazis
Evangelos Achilleas ParaskevasEvangelos Achilleas Paraskevas
Evangelos Achilleas Paraskevas
We construct an updated and extended compilation of growth-rate data based on recent redshift-space distortion measurements. The data set consists of 34 data points and includes corrections for model dependence. In order to minimize overlap and maximize the independence of the data points, we also construct a subsample of this compilation (a “gold” growth data set) which consists of 18 data points. We test the consistency of this data set with the best-fit Planck15/ΛCDM parameters in the context of General Relativity using the evolution equation for the growth factor δ(a) with a wCDM background. We find tension at the ∼3σ level between the best-fit parameters w (the dark energy equation of state), Ω0m (the matter density parameter), and σ8 (the matter power spectrum normalization on scales 8h−1  Mpc) and the corresponding Planck15/ΛCDM parameters (w=−1, Ω0m=0.315, and σ8=0.831). We show that the tension disappears if we allow for evolution of the effective Newton constant, parametrized as Geff(a)/GN=1+ga(1−a)n−ga(1−a)2n with n≥2 where ga and n are parameters of the model, a is the scale factor, and z=1/a−1 is the redshift. This parametrization satisfies three important criteria: a) positive energy of the graviton (Geff>0), b) consistency with big bang nucleosynthesis constraints (Geff(a≪1)/GN=1), and c) consistency with Solar System tests (Geff(a=1)/GN=1 and Geff′(a=1)/GN=0). We show that the best-fit form of Geff(z) obtained from the growth data corresponds to weakening gravity at recent redshifts (decreasing function of z), and we demonstrate that this behavior is not consistent with any scalar-tensor Lagrangian with a real scalar field. Finally, we use MGCAMB to find the best-fit Geff(z) obtained from the Planck cosmic microwave background power spectrum on large angular scales and show that it is a mildly increasing function of z, in 3σ tension with the corresponding decreasing best-fit Geff(z) obtained from the growth data.

1 January 2007 in Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SNSavvas Nesseris
Savvas Nesseris
Evangelos Achilleas ParaskevasEvangelos Achilleas Paraskevas
Evangelos Achilleas Paraskevas

22 December 2005 in Physical Review D
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SNSavvas Nesseris
Savvas Nesseris
Evangelos Achilleas ParaskevasEvangelos Achilleas Paraskevas
Evangelos Achilleas Paraskevas
We have performed a comparative analysis of three recent and reliable SnIa datasets available in the literature: the Full Gold (FG) dataset (157 data points 0<z<1.75), a Truncated Gold (TG) dataset (140 data points 0<z<1) and the most recent Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS) dataset (115 data points 0<z<1). We have analyzed and compared the likelihood of cosmological constant and dynamical dark energy parametrizations allowing for crossing of the phantom divide line (PDL). We find that, even though the constraints obtained using the three datasets are consistent with each other at the 95% confidence level, the latest (SNLS) dataset shows distinct trends which are not shared by the Gold datasets. We find that the best fit dynamical w(z) obtained from the SNLS dataset does not cross the PDL w=−1 and remains above and close to the w=−1 line for the whole redshift range 0<z<1 showing no evidence for phantom behavior. The Λ+Cold   Dark   Matter (LCDM) parameter values (w0=−1, w1=0) almost coincide with the best fit parameters of the dynamical w(z) parametrizations. In contrast, the best fit dynamical w(z) obtained from the Gold datasets (FG and TG) clearly crosses the PDL and departs significantly from the PDL w=−1 line while the LCDM parameter values are about 2σ away from the best fit w(z). In addition, the (Ω0m,ΩΛ) parameters in a LCDM parametrization without a flat prior, fit by the SNLS dataset, favor the minimal flat LCDM concordance model. The corresponding fit with the Gold datasets mildly favors a closed universe and the flat LCDM parameter values are 1σ–2σ away from the best fit (Ω0m,ΩΛ).

25 November 2013 in Physical Review D
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SNSavvas Nesseris
Savvas Nesseris
SBS. Basilakos
S. Basilakos
Emmanuel N. SaridakisEmmanuel N. Saridakis
Emmanuel N. Saridakis
Evangelos Achilleas ParaskevasEvangelos Achilleas Paraskevas
Evangelos Achilleas Paraskevas
We investigate the cosmological predictions of several $f(T)$ models, with up to two parameters, at both the background and the perturbation levels. Using current cosmological observations (geometric supernovae type Ia, cosmic microwave background and baryonic acoustic oscillation and dynamical growth data) we impose constraints on the distortion parameter, which quantifies the deviation of these models from the concordance $$\Lambda${}$ cosmology at the background level. In addition we constrain the growth index $$\gamma${}$ predicted in the context of these models using the latest perturbation growth data in the context of three parametrizations for $$\gamma${}$. The evolution of the best fit effective Newton constant, which incorporates the $f(T)$-gravity effects, is also obtained along with the corresponding $1$\sigma${}$ error regions. We show that all the viable parameter sectors of the $f(T)$ gravity models considered practically reduce these models to $$\Lambda${}\mathrm{CDM}$. Thus, the degrees of freedom that open up to $$\Lambda${}\mathrm{CDM}$ in the context of $f(T)$ gravity models are not utilized by the cosmological data leading to an overall disfavor of these models.