Yanchun Liu

Prof. Yanchun Liu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 August 2019 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJian Song
Jian Song
SWShiqiang Wan
Shiqiang Wan
SPShilong Piao
Shilong Piao
AKAlan K. Knapp
Alan K. Knapp
ACAimée T. Classen
Aimée T. Classen
MZMengmei Zheng
Mengmei Zheng
Direct quantification of terrestrial biosphere responses to global change is crucial for projections of future climate change in Earth system models. Here, we synthesized ecosystem carbon-cycling data from 1,119 experiments performed over the past four decades concerning changes in temperature, precipitation, CO2 and nitrogen across major terrestrial vegetation types of the world. Most experiments manipulated single rather than multiple global change drivers in temperate ecosystems of the USA, Europe and China. The magnitudes of warming and elevated CO2 treatments were consistent with the ranges of future projections, whereas those of precipitation changes and nitrogen inputs often exceeded the projected ranges. Increases in global change drivers consistently accelerated, but decreased precipitation slowed down carbon-cycle processes. Nonlinear (including synergistic and antagonistic) effects among global change drivers were rare. Belowground carbon allocation responded negatively to increased precipitation and nitrogen addition and positively to decreased precipitation and elevated CO2. The sensitivities of carbon variables to multiple global change drivers depended on the background climate and ecosystem condition, suggesting that Earth system models should be evaluated using site-specific conditions for best uses of this large dataset. Together, this synthesis underscores an urgent need to explore the interactions among multiple global change drivers in underrepresented regions such as semi-arid ecosystems, forests in the tropics and subtropics, and Arctic tundra when forecasting future terrestrial carbon-climate feedback.

20 February 2019 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RMRenhui Miao
Renhui Miao
MJMa Jun
Ma Jun
YLYinzhan Liu
Yinzhan Liu
YLYanchun Liu
Yanchun Liu
ZYZhongling Yang
Zhongling Yang
MGMeixia Guo
Meixia Guo
Global changes and human disturbances can strongly affect the quantity of aboveground litter entering soils, which could result in substantial cascading effects on soil biogeochemical processes in forests. Despite extensive reports, it is unclear how the variations in litter depth affect soil carbon and nitrogen cycling. The responses of soil carbon and nitrogen to the variability of litter inputs were examined in a coniferous–broadleaf mixed forest of Central China. The litter input manipulation included five treatments: no litter input, natural litter, double litter, triple litter, and quadruple litter. Multifold litter additions decreased soil temperature but did not affect soil moisture after 2.5 years. Reductions in soil pH under litter additions were larger than increases under no litter input. Litter quantity did not affect soil total organic carbon, whereas litter addition stimulated soil dissolved organic carbon more strongly than no litter input suppressed it. The triggering priming effect of litter manipulation on soil respiration requires a substantial litter quantity, and the impacts of a slight litter change on soil respiration are negligible. Litter quantity did not impact soil total nitrogen, and only strong litter fluctuations changed the content of soil available nitrogen (nitrate nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen). Litter addition enhanced soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen more strongly than no litter input. Our results imply that the impacts of multifold litter inputs on soil carbon and nitrogen are different with a single litter treatment. These findings suggest that variability in aboveground litter inputs resulting from environmental change and human disturbances have great potential to change soil carbon and nitrogen in forest ecosystems. The variability of aboveground litter inputs needs to be taken into account to predict the responses of terrestrial soil carbon and nitrogen cycling to environmental changes and forest management.

1 October 2016 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYanchun Liu
Yanchun Liu
SLShirong Liu
Shirong Liu
SWShiqiang Wan
Shiqiang Wan
JWJingxin Wang
Jingxin Wang
JLJunwei Luan
Junwei Luan
HWHui Wang
Hui Wang

1 July 2013 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YZYuandong Zhang
Yuandong Zhang
FGFengxue Gu
Fengxue Gu
SLShirong Liu
Shirong Liu
YLYanchun Liu
Yanchun Liu
CLChao Li
Chao Li

20 December 2013 in Ecological Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYanchun Liu
Yanchun Liu
Shirong LiuShirong Liu
Shirong Liu
JWJingxin Wang
Jingxin Wang
XZXueling Zhu
Xueling Zhu
YZYuandong Zhang
Yuandong Zhang
XLXiaojing Liu
Xiaojing Liu
The forest canopy cover can directly and indirectly affect soil conditions and hence soil carbon emission through soil respiration. Little is known, however, on the effects of canopy cover on soil respiration under the canopy of different tree species and soil water conditions. We have examined the variation in soil respiration at different soil water conditions (dry 20 %, v/v) under different tree canopy covers in comparison with the canopy interspace in a temperate coniferous ( Pinus armandii Franch) and broadleaved ( Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata ) mixed forest in central China. The results show that soil respiration measured under tree canopy cover varied with canopy size and soil water content. Soil respiration under small‐sized canopies of P. armandii (PS) was higher than that under large‐sized (PL) canopies, but the difference was only significant under the dry soil condition. However, soil respiration under large‐sized canopies of Q. aliena (QL) was significantly greater than that under small‐sized (QS) canopies under both dry and wet soil conditions. The difference in soil respiration between differently sized canopies of Q. aliena (33.5–35.8 %) was significantly greater than that between differently sized canopies of P. armandii (2.4–8.1 %). Differences in soil respiration between inter‐plant gaps and under QS canopies in both the dry and wet soil conditions were significant. Significant increases in soil respiration (9.7–32.2 %) during the transition from dry to wet conditions were found regardless of canopy size, but the increase of soil respiration was significantly lower under P. armandii canopies (9.7–17.7 %) than under Q. aliena canopies (25.9–31.5 %). Our findings that the canopy cover of different tree species influences soil respiration under different soil moisture conditions could provide useful information for parameterizing and/or calibrating carbon flux models, especially for spatially explicit carbon models.

1 January 2017 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYanchun Liu
Yanchun Liu
Shirong LiuShirong Liu
Shirong Liu
SWShiqiang Wan
Shiqiang Wan
JWJingxin Wang
Jingxin Wang
HWHui Wang
Hui Wang
KLKuan Liu
Kuan Liu