Background and Aim: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a major determinant of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Altered microRNA levels lead to serious chronic diseases, such as diabetes. We aimed to measure the expression levels of two microRNAs, microRNA126 and 192 in DN and investigate their connection with albuminuria levels. Methods: This study included 229 subjects (134 DN patients and 95 controls). Serum lipid profiles, glucose levels, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and renal functions were assayed. The microRNA126 and microRNA192 expression levels were determined by real-time PCR. Results: Patients with DN had higher weights, BMI values, glucose levels (p<0.001), HbA1c levels (p<0.001), urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) values (p<0.001), urea levels (P=0.002), and creatinine levels (P=0.004) and lower expression levels of both microRNA192 (p<0.001) and microRNA126 (p<0.001) than controls. MicroRNA126 expression was positively correlated with age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and microRNA192 expression but negatively correlated with blood sugar, HbA1c, urea, creatinine and ACR. MicroRNA192 had higher sensitivity (91%), specificity (94%), and area under the curve (AUC) (0.967) values than microRNA126 (sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 68%; AUC, 0.897) and thus can precisely diagnose DN. Conclusion: Both MicroRNA126 and microRNA192 expression were obviously associated with DN and might determine the progression of the disease owing to prominent relation with macroalbuminuria.
1 August 2022 in The Application of Clinical Genetics
Background: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic roles of AFAP1-AS1 and ASB16-AS1 in colorectal cancer and highlight their roles in predicting colorectal cancer patients’ prognosis. Methods: In this case–control study, 146 participants were involved. Group I included 47 patients with CRC. Group II composed of 49 patients with benign lesions in the colon, and Group III included 50 apparently normal subjects of coincided age and gender as controls. All participants were subjected to clinical and endoscopic evaluations, CA19-9, CEA, and quantification of relative expression of lncRNAs ASB16-AS1 and AFAP1-AS1. Results: CRC patients had significantly elevated expression levels of both lncRNAs in tissue and plasma samples versus benign and control groups (p < 0.001). Despite the higher sensitivity of tissue samples results, the relative expression of both lncRNAs in plasma samples was very encouraging in the discrimination between patients with CRC versus control and benign groups. Furthermore, both lncRNAs could discriminate patients with early-stage CRC (stage I&II) from being colonic lesion and control groups with better sensitivity and specificity presented by ASB16-AS1 in tissue and plasma than results detailed by AFAP1-AS1. High expression levels of ASB16-AS1 in tissue and plasma and tissue lncRNA AFAP1-AS1 are significantly correlated with decreased overall survival (p < 0.001) and reduced progression-free (p < 0.001) compared to low expression in CRC patients. Conclusion: We propose the utilization of lncRNA ASB16-AS1 and lncRNA AFAP1-AS1 as biomarkers in diagnosis and prognosis estimation for CRC patients. Moreover, their value in early CRC patients may affect the assortment of target therapy and treatment protocols.
1 December 2020 in The Application of Clinical Genetics
Background and Aim: Genetic factors are vital participants in the development and progression of myocardial infarction (MI). Adiponectin has been assumed to have a protective role in MI and adiponectin receptors variants could be a determinant for atherosclerosis. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of ADIPOQ (rs2241766) and ADIPOR2 (rs10773989) polymorphisms and their association with mRNA levels and circulatory adiponectin levels in patients with MI. Subjects and Methods: A total of 220 participants were classified into two groups: group 1 included 120 patients with MI, and group 2 involved 100 healthy participants as controls. Genotyping of ADIPOQ (rs2241766) and ADIPOR2 (rs10773989) polymorphisms were analyzed using an allele discrimination assay with real-time PCR and their relative expression or mRNA levels were determined by real-time PCR. Serum adiponectin level was determined using an ELISA technique. Results: The ADIPOQ rs2241766 GG genotype and G allele and the CC genotype and C allele of ADIPOR2 rs10773989 were significantly prevalent in patients with MI and associated with increased risk of MI. We detected a marked reduction in serum adiponectin, ADIPOQ and ADIPOR2 mRNA levels in patients than control. The GG genotype of ADIPOQ rs2241766 and the CC genotype of ADIPOR2 rs10773989 had the lowest levels of their mRNA and adiponectin level in both patients and controls. Conclusion: Adiponectin gene and receptor variants are potentially related to MI risk; furthermore, their expressions were markedly depressed in MI which suggests their use as potential biomarkers for MI.