Sandra Saschenbrecker

Dr. Sandra Saschenbrecker

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2011 in Journal of Neuroimmunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KWKlaus-Peter Wandinger
Klaus-Peter Wandinger
SSSandra Saschenbrecker
Sandra Saschenbrecker
WSWinfried Stoecker
Winfried Stoecker
JDJosep Dalmau
Josep Dalmau

1 June 2007 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSandra Saschenbrecker
Sandra Saschenbrecker
ABAndreas Bracher
Andreas Bracher
KRKarnam Vasudeva Rao
Karnam Vasudeva Rao
BRBharathi Vasudeva Rao
Bharathi Vasudeva Rao
FHF. Ulrich Hartl
F. Ulrich Hartl
MHManajit Hayer-Hartl
Manajit Hayer-Hartl
After folding, many proteins must assemble into oligomeric complexes to become biologically active. Here we describe the role of RbcX as an assembly chaperone of ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), the enzyme responsible for the fixation of atmospheric carbon dioxide. In cyanobacteria and plants, Rubisco is an approximately 520 kDa complex composed of eight large subunits (RbcL) and eight small subunits (RbcS). We found that cyanobacterial RbcX functions downstream of chaperonin-mediated RbcL folding in promoting the formation of RbcL(8) core complexes. Structural analysis revealed that the 15 kDa RbcX forms a homodimer with two cooperating RbcL-binding regions. A central cleft specifically binds the exposed C-terminal peptide of RbcL subunits, enabling a peripheral surface of RbcX to mediate RbcL(8) assembly. Due to the dynamic nature of these interactions, RbcX is readily displaced from RbcL(8) complexes by RbcS, producing the active enzyme. The strategies employed by RbcX in achieving substrate specificity and efficient product release may be generally relevant in assisted assembly reactions.

12 April 2010 in Experimental Dermatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ESEnno Schmidt
Enno Schmidt
CDCornelia Dähnrich
Cornelia Dähnrich
ARAnke Rosemann
Anke Rosemann
CPChristian Probst
Christian Probst
LKLars Komorowski
Lars Komorowski
DZDetlef Zillikens
Detlef Zillikens

1 June 2005 in Phytochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
UEUta Effmert
Uta Effmert
SSSandra Saschenbrecker
Sandra Saschenbrecker
JRJeannine Ross
Jeannine Ross
FNFlorence Negre
Florence Negre
CFChris M. Fraser
Chris M. Fraser
BPBirgit Piechulla
Birgit Piechulla

20 August 2021 in Journal of Medical Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RDRamona Dolscheid‐Pommerich
Ramona Dolscheid‐Pommerich
EBEva Bartok
Eva Bartok
MRMarcel Renn
Marcel Renn
BKBeate Mareike Kümmerer
Beate Mareike Kümmerer
BSBianca Schulte
Bianca Schulte
GHGunther Hartmann
Gunther Hartmann
In the current COVID‐19 pandemic, a better understanding of the relationship between merely binding and functionally neutralizing antibodies is necessary to characterize protective antiviral immunity following infection or vaccination. This study analyzes the level of correlation between the novel quantitative EUROIMMUN Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 QuantiVac ELISA (IgG) and a microneutralization assay. A panel of 123 plasma samples from a COVID‐19 outbreak study population, preselected by semiquantitative anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG testing, was used to assess the relationship between the novel quantitative ELISA (IgG) and a microneutralization assay. Binding IgG targeting the S1 antigen was detected in 106 (86.2%) samples using the QuantiVac ELISA, while 89 (72.4%) samples showed neutralizing antibody activity. Spearman's correlation analysis demonstrated a strong positive relationship between anti‐S1 IgG levels and neutralizing antibody titers (rs = 0.819, p < 0.0001). High and low anti‐S1 IgG levels were associated with a positive predictive value of 72.0% for high‐titer neutralizing antibodies and a negative predictive value of 90.8% for low‐titer neutralizing antibodies, respectively. These results substantiate the implementation of the QuantiVac ELISA to assess protective immunity following infection or vaccination.

20 August 2019 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSandra Saschenbrecker
Sandra Saschenbrecker
IKIngolf Karl
Ingolf Karl
LKLars Komorowski
Lars Komorowski
CPChristian Probst
Christian Probst
CDCornelia Dähnrich
Cornelia Dähnrich
WSWolfgang Schlumberger
Wolfgang Schlumberger
Autoimmune bullous dermatoses encompass a variety of organ-specific autoimmune diseases that manifest with cutaneous and/or mucosal blisters and erosions. They are characterized by autoantibodies targeting structural proteins of the skin, which are responsible for the intercellular contact between epidermal keratinocytes and for adhesion of the basal keratinocytes to the dermis. The autoantibodies disrupt the adhesive functions, leading to splitting and blister formation. In pemphigus diseases, blisters form intraepidermally, whereas in all other disease types they occur subepidermally. Early identification of autoimmune bullous dermatoses is crucial for both treatment and prognosis, particularly as regards tumor-associated disease entities. The diagnosis is based on clinical symptoms, histopathology, direct immunofluorescence to detect antibody/complement deposits, and the determination of circulating autoantibodies. The identification of various target antigens has paved the way for the recent development of numerous specific autoantibody tests. In particular, optimized designer antigens and multiplex test formats for indirect immunofluorescence and ELISA have enhanced and refined the laboratory analysis, enabling highly efficient serodiagnosis and follow-up. This review elaborates on the current standards in the serological diagnostics for autoimmune bullous dermatoses.